Re: virtual Tape consumption statistics - DFRMM

2022-07-29 Thread Brian Westerman
Your tape management system (CA-1, RMM etc.) can tell you what it thinks is the 
size, and your Virtual tape appliance has the data on how much it compressed it 
(if at all) after it got hold of the data.  Also, if you data is sent to a 
storage point, i.e. like storing on a NetApp appliance instead of internally to 
the virtual tape appliance, then it could have yet a different number depending 
on it's compression and deduplication settings. 

So, I guess the answer is that you have the data available at multiple points, 
and they are all correct for that particular spot.  

CA1 could think it wrote 5GB to the tape, but the virtual tape appliance might 
have compressed it down to 2gb (IDRC and it's own internal compression) and the 
Network appliance could have manged to make it 1.5GB (or 3GB if it was poorly 
set up).  They would all be "right". 

Brian

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


virtual Tape consumption statistics - DFRMM

2022-07-29 Thread Jake Anderson
Hello,

Is there a sample JCL to list the top consumers of Virtual tape allocation
or any smf record which can tell about the virtual tapes highest
consumption based on the Jobs.

Jake

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN