Re: Legality of IETF meetings in PRC. Was: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF

2009-10-07 Thread Henk Uijterwaal


(Personal opinion)


On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Margaret Wasserman wrote:


While I do think that the IAOC should be aware of the potential legal 
implications of where we hold our meetings, I wonder if we are 
treating China unfairly in this discussion...


I agree.  So-far, we have always assumed that discussions on crypto
as well as writing, testing and using code during the meeting were
legal in the country.  And if they weren't, we'd assume that the
local policy would not notice.  China is not different in this respect.



Perhaps this is something that we could expect our host to help us 
determine?


The IAOC is in contact with the host about all the issues raised on
the list (and then some more).

Henk

--
--
Henk Uijterwaal   Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre  http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
P.O.Box 10096  Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam  1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The NetherlandsThe NetherlandsMobile: +31.6.55861746
--

Belgium: an unsolvable problem, discussed in endless meetings, with no
 hope for a solution, where everybody still lives happily.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts (Requirements forsupporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN) toInformational RFC

2009-10-07 Thread julien.meuric
Hi all.

Just a few minor comments:
- The I-D refers to the EXP field several times (pages 11, 13, 15,
17...) whereas it is now named Traffic Class, as per RFC 5462.
- Section 5.8 tackles PCE, thus putting some requirements on the PCE WG:
do we expect that they are endorsed tacitly? In this specific case, it
is only specified as SHOULD, so impact is limited, but what is the
status of this kind of draft defining requirements over multiple WGs? In
case it be superset by draft-ietf-pce-vpn-req, a reference would be
welcome.

Thanks,

Julien


-Original Message-
From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG

The IESG has received a request from the Layer 3 Virtual Private
Networks 
WG (l3vpn) to consider the following document:

- 'Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS

   IP-VPN '
   draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-04.txt as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-10-20. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-0
4.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=
17192rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
ietf-annou...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-preauth-ps (Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Early Authentication Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

2009-10-07 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Handover Keying WG (hokey) to 
consider the following document:

- 'Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Early Authentication Problem 
   Statement '
   draft-ietf-hokey-preauth-ps-09.txt as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-10-21. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hokey-preauth-ps-09.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=16428rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


BEHAVE interim teleconference call

2009-10-07 Thread IESG Secretary
As announced at the Stockholm IETF's BEHAVE meeting, BEHAVE will be using
WebEx and PSTN conferencing for the following interim meeting
to discuss 6/4 translation and advance those documents:

Wednesday, October 21, 7am-9am Pacific Time

Per http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates.html#76, the cut-off
for revised I-Ds is October 26.

Agendas WebEx URL and PSTN dial-in information will be published
on BEHAVE's wiki at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/behave/trac/wiki
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


76th IETF - DRAFT Agenda

2009-10-07 Thread IETF Secretariat
76th IETF Meeting
Hiroshima, Japan
November 8-13, 2009
Host: WIDE

Only 31 days until the Hiroshima IETF! 

The DRAFT Agenda is now available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/76/agenda.html
A more final agenda will be available Friday, 16 October.
The IETF agenda is subject to change, up to and during the meeting.

Early Bird registration and payment cut-off is Friday, 30 October at
17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC/GMT).
Online registration for the IETF meeting is at: 
http://www.ietf.org/meetings/76/
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5522 on Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use in Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks

2009-10-07 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5522

Title:  Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements 
for Operational Use in Aeronautics and 
Space Exploration Mobile Networks 
Author: W. Eddy, W. Ivancic,
T. Davis
Status: Informational
Date:   October 2009
Mailbox:we...@grc.nasa.gov, 
william.d.ivan...@grc.nasa.gov, 
terry.l.da...@boeing.com
Pages:  31
Characters: 79570
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-mext-aero-reqs-04.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5522.txt

This document describes the requirements and desired properties of
Network Mobility (NEMO) Route Optimization techniques for use in
global-networked communications systems for aeronautics and space
exploration.

Substantial input to these requirements was given by aeronautical
communications experts outside the IETF, including members of the
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other
aeronautical communications standards bodies.  This memo provides 
information for the Internet community.

This document is a product of the Mobility EXTensions for IPv6 Working Group of 
the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce