I concur with Dave's comment and support publication of the draft. Dave
On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:06 PM, "David Allan I" <david.i.al...@ericsson.com> wrote: > I think it is unfortunate that we are in a situation where such a document > has utility. But ultimately it does. > > Therefore I support the publication of draft-sprecher... > > D > > > >> MPLS Working Group, >> >> Please be aware of the IETF last call as shown below. The document was >> presented for publication as an individual RFC with IETF consensus and >> AD sponsorship. >> >> This draft is clearly close and relevant to the work you do, but after >> discussing with the chairs I came to the conclusion that it does not >> comment on the technical or process decisions of the MPLS working >> groups, and it does not attempt to make any technical evaluations or >> definitions within the scope of the MPLS working group. It is more of >> a philosophical analysis of the way the IETF approaches the "two >> solutions" problem with special reference to MPLS-TP OAM. >> >> Thus, I am accepting the document as AD Sponsored rather than running >> it through the MPLS working group. My reasoning is that the working >> group has got plenty to do working on technical issues without being >> diverted into wider IETF philosophy. >> >> As an AD Sponsored I-D it is subject to a four week IETF last call. >> That is plenty of opportunity for everyone to comment and express >> their views. Please send your comments to the IETF mailing list as >> described below, or (in exceptional circumstances) direct to the IESG. >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > m...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
