Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

[Fritz F. Saad]

Tood,



Agreed, we should work to fix that.



Fritz.



- Original Message - 
From: todd glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)


The IETF has an obligation to WIPO and to the DMCA and well - so far its
failed those pretty well I think.

Todd Glassey

- Original Message - 
From: Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)



 This is what I meant when I said that the charter is unclear
 and it must explicitly state that NEA is not meant as a
 protection mechanism of any sort for the network.
 
 
  I don't believe the Charter needs to delve into this at all.  If some
people
  see it as part of their protection mechanisms, so be it.
 
  Darryl (Dassa) Lynch

 The IETF has an obligation to truth in advertising so IMHO we should not
 claim protection that doesn't exist, even implicitly.

 Brian

 ___
 Ietf mailing list
 Ietf@ietf.org
 https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

IPv6 Dynamic discovery of home agents

[Fritz F. Saad]

Greetings,

Just wondering if you have pointers to RFCs (or RFC drafts) regarding the
following items:

1- Dynamic discovery of home agents
2- Query home agent for registered nodes with specific home agents

Any pointers, RFCs, ideas are appreciated.

All the best,
Fritz.

Re: spam

[Fritz F. Saad]

I can only echo Bill's comment on that regards, and I don't find that too
extreme.

Cheers,
Fritz.
- Original Message - 
From: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:18 AM
Subject: spam


 Personally I think the best idea I've seen yet is the idea of a prefix,
such
 as ADV in the subject line. The real problem I agree is with sorting
through
 unsolicited mail for what you really want. It maybe possible to put
 something like ADV in a protocol header. Or maybe that is too extreme.

 Bill

Home agent discovery

[Fritz F. Saad]

Greetings,



  I'm looking for ways to manage (via SNMP if possible) home agents. My goal
is to be able to :  -1- Dynamically discover home agents -2- Query the home
agent for registered nodes with specific home agents.  Any pointers, RFCs,
ideas are appreciated.



All the best,
Fritz.