RFC 7349 on LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication

2014-08-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 7349

Title:  LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication 
Author: L. Zheng, M. Chen, M. Bhatia
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date:   August 2014
Mailbox:vero.zh...@huawei.com, 
mach.c...@huawei.com, 
ma...@ionosnetworks.com
Pages:  14
Characters: 32447
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-10.txt

URL:https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7349.txt

This document introduces a new optional Cryptographic Authentication
TLV that LDP can use to secure its Hello messages.  It secures the
Hello messages against spoofing attacks and some well-known attacks
against the IP header.  This document describes a mechanism to secure
the LDP Hello messages using Hashed Message Authentication Code
(HMAC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Secure Hash Standard family of algorithms.

This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group 
of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC




Protocol Action: 'LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-10.txt)

2014-06-23 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication'
  (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-10.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group.

The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Alia Atlas.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth/




Technical Summary

   This document introduces a new optional Cryptographic Authentication
   TLV that LDP can use to secure its Hello messages.  It secures the
   Hello messages against spoofing attacks and some well known attacks
   against the IP header.  This document describes a mechanism to secure
   the LDP Hello messages using National Institute of Standards and
   Technology (NIST) Secure Hash Standard family of algorithms.

Working Group Summary

   Taking a mostly security document through a working group like MPLS
   is a bit tricky. Most of the participants do not have there focus on 
   security issues. While a large majority agree that the security work has 
   a huge value, it is often not highest on the priority list for the average
   MPLS participant.

   Securing routing protocols, like LDP, started with a analysis done by
   the KARP working group. KARP pointed to the UDP based Hello 
   messages as a potential risk.
   
   The current draft has been developed by the MPLS working group and
   reviewed by KARP during WGLC. The comments from people active in 
   KARP have been very valuable.

Document Quality

   Currently we do not know of existing implementations of this draft,

   The SecDir review from Yaron Sheffer took a while to resolve, but has
   improved the document.

Personnel

Adrian Farrel is the Responsible AD
Loa Andersson is the Document Shepherd.



Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-05.txt (LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication) to Proposed Standard

2014-05-07 Thread The IESG

The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'LDP Hello Cryptographic Authentication'
  draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth-05.txt as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-05-21. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

   This document introduces a new optional Cryptographic Authentication
   TLV that LDP can use to secure its Hello messages.  It secures the
   Hello messages against spoofing attacks and some well known attacks
   against the IP header.  This document describes a mechanism to secure
   the LDP Hello messages using National Institute of Standards and
   Technology (NIST) Secure Hash Standard family of algorithms.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.



Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???

2013-01-07 Thread Dale R. Worley
 I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing
 protocol for wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which
 standard does LEACH , its family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.

A Google search suggests that LEACH has not been standardized.  LEACH
appears to have been invented by academics; several papers have been
published about it.

In regard to layer 3, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model

Dale


Re: Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???

2013-01-05 Thread Abdussalam Baryun
Hi Mahmoud,

The LEACH is not a protocol worked on so far in IETF, not sure if it
standard yet elsewhere!

AB
-

Hello everybody,

I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing
protocol for wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which
standard does LEACH , its family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.

Thank you


Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???

2013-01-03 Thread Mahmoud Emam


Hello everybody,


I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing protocol for 
wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which standard does LEACH , its 
family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.
 
Thank you

Hello ::Please I need to know LEACH protocol standard???

2013-01-03 Thread Mahmoud Emam


Hello everybody,


I am a researcher of Master's degree , working on LEACH routing protocol for 
wireless sensor networks and i need to know for which standard does LEACH , its 
family ,or even Layer 3 belong to.
 
Thank you

RFC 6395 on An Interface Identifier (ID) Hello Option for PIM

2011-10-10 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 6395

Title:  An Interface Identifier (ID) Hello 
Option for PIM 
Author: S. Gulrajani, S. Venaas
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date:   October 2011
Mailbox:same...@cisco.com, 
s...@cisco.com
Pages:  6
Characters: 11469
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6395.txt

This document defines a new PIM Hello option to advertise an
Interface Identifier that can be used by PIM protocols to uniquely
identify an interface of a neighboring router.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]

This document is a product of the Protocol Independent Multicast Working Group 
of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt)

2011-08-29 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM'
  (draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt) as a Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Protocol Independent Multicast
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid/




Technical Summary

   This document defines a new PIM Hello option to advertise an
   interface identifier that can be used by PIM protocols to uniquely
   identify an interface of a neighboring router.

Working Group Summary

   There is consensus within the PIM WG to publish the document. The
   participation has been with individuals from a variety of vendors and
   providers. The authors made minor changes based upon feedback during the
   wglc.

Document Quality

   There exists at least one implementation of this protocol for which IANA
   early allocation was performed.

Personnel

   Mike McBride is the Document Shepherd
   Adrian Farrel is the Responsible Area Director

RFC Editor Note

Section1 New final paragraph
NEW
   All multi-byte integers in this specification are transmitted in 
   network byte order (i.e. most-significant byte first).
END


Section 2
OLD
   The Interface Identifier option is used to identify which interface
   of a neighboring router a PIM Hello [RFC4601] is sent on.  This
   allows PIM protocols to refer to, or identify, a particular interface
   on a neighboring router.
NEW
   The Interface Identifier option is used to identify through which
   interface of a neighboring router a PIM Hello [RFC4601] was sent.  
   This allows PIM protocols to refer to, or identify, a particular
   interface on a neighboring router.
END


Section 2.1
OLD
   The 32 bit Local Interface Identifier is selected such that it is
   unique among the router's PIM enabled interfaces.  That is, there
   MUST NOT be two PIM interfaces with the same Local Interface
   Identifier.  While an interface is up, the Identifier MUST always be
   the same once it has been allocated.  If an interface goes down and
   comes up, the router SHOULD use the same Identifier.  Many systems
   make use of an ifIndex [RFC1213], which can be used as a Local
   Interface Identifier.

   The Local Interface Identifier MUST be non-zero.  The reason for
   this, is that some protocols may want to only optionally refer to an
   Interface using the Interface Identifier Hello option, and use the
   value of 0 to show that it is not referred to.  Note that the value
   of 0 is not a valid ifIndex as defined in [RFC1213].
NEW
   The 32 bit Local Interface Identifier is selected such that it is
   unique among the router's PIM enabled interfaces.  That is, there
   MUST NOT be two PIM interfaces with the same Local Interface
   Identifier. While an interface is up, the Identifier MUST always be
   the same once it has been allocated.  If an interface goes down and
   comes up, the router SHOULD use the same Identifier.  If a node goes
   down and comes up again. the Identifier for each interface MAY
   change.  Many systems make use of an ifIndex [RFC2863] as a Local
   Interface Identifier.

   The Local Interface Identifier MUST be non-zero.  The reason for
   this, is that some protocols may have messages that optionally
   reference an Interface Identifier, and they may use the value of 0
   to show that no Interface Identifier is being referenced. Note that
   the value of 0 is not a valid ifIndex as defined in [RFC2863].
END

Section 2.2
OLD
   The 32 bit Router Identifier may be used to uniquely identify the
   router.  It may be selected to be unique within some administrative
   domain, or possibly globally unique.  The requirements for the scope
   in which it needs to be unique depend on the protocol that utilizes
   this.  A router implementation MAY choose an IPv4 unicast address
   assigned to the router as the Router Identifier, but MUST allow the
   identifier to be configured manually.  Protocols such as BGP
   [RFC4271] and OSPFv2 [RFC2328] are other protocols making use of 32
   bit identifiers for routers.  One may use the same identifier to
   construct the Interface Identifier option, provided it meets the
   stability and uniqueness requirements of protocols making use of this
   option.
NEW
   The 32 bit Router Identifier may be used to uniquely identify the
   router. The requirements for the scope in which the Router Identifier
   needs to be unique depend on the protocols that utilize it. It may 
   need to be unique within some administrative domain, or it may 
   possibly be globally unique. 

   A router implementation selects a Router Identifier according to a
   configured policy that defines the uniqueness scope. Thus, an 
   implementation MAY be configured to choose an IPv4 unicast address
   assigned to the router as the Router Identifier, but the 
   implementation MUST allow the identifier

Last Call: draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt (An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM) to Proposed Standard

2011-07-23 Thread The IESG

The IESG has received a request from the Protocol Independent Multicast
WG (pim) to consider the following document:
- 'An Interface ID Hello Option for PIM'
  draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid-01.txt as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-08-12. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

   This document defines a new PIM Hello option to advertise an
   interface identifier that can be used by PIM protocols to uniquely
   identify an interface of a neighboring router.


The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-hello-intid/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Re: Hello IETF!

2007-09-26 Thread Marc Manthey

On Sep 23, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Felipe Rodrigues wrote:
Yes marc! It's my site. It's a little freeze for the time, but I'll  
post something soon. I'm from Brazil, so the articles are writen in  
Brazilian Portuguese and english.


ola felipe,

I was really concerned about privacy in chats through the internet,  
so I create this program. It works with a client and a server using  
TCP/IP and criptography.


your concerns about privacy and data retention are understandable  ,  
things are going worse and worse everywhere in the world  since the
 patriot act  had changed . We are having some capaigns here in  
germany aswell because our Interior Minister ( Schäuble)  want to  
turn our country with online visitation into a supervisory state ,  
thats why we foundet the pirate party 2006 here in germany.http:// 
int.piratenpartei.de/List_of_Pirateparties


At this moment I'm working in a chat system with AES (Rjindael)  
cryptography, when I have a Beta version of it I post here and in  
the site.


this is might be interesting for you http://www.cspace.in/

Well... More about me... I use Java,Delphi, C++, sql, php and html.  
I love ajax. I'm single (there are girls in IETF? :D ). I love CSI  
(crime scene investigation xD ), lost, simpsons.I DO NOT like to  
play football (yeah, most brazilians do, me not xD) but I love  
basketball.


I had a small musicstudio for ten years  till 2001 and now i am  
looking for new challenges and trying to get some people together for  
my project . I am interested in streaming , multimedia and  
multiconferencing i am on macintosh since 1994 , its one of the best  
system i believe.


all the best and good luck for the future.

greetings from germany :-)

sincerly

marc


If you have msn, add me felipevr36[at]hotmail[dot]com


see you!


One must act on what has not yet happened.
--Lao Tzu
web: http://www.let.de
.local http://stattfernsehen.com



___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Hello IETF!

2007-09-15 Thread bidu.pub
HI!

 

I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.

 

Today I've joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be useful to this 
community.   
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Re: Hello IETF!

2007-09-15 Thread Joe Baptista

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


HI!

I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.

Today I’ve joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be useful to 
this community.



tell us more.

and welcome

regards
joe baptista

--
Joe Baptistawww.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium

The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive,
Representative  Accountable to the Internet community @large.

 Office: +1 (202) 517-1593
Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

begin:vcard
fn:Joe Baptista
n:Baptista;Joe
org:PublicRoot Consortium
adr:;;963 Ford Street;Peterborough;Ontario;K9J 5V5 ;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:PublicRoot Representative
tel;fax:+1 (509) 479-0084 
tel;cell:+1 (416) 912-6551
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.publicroot.org
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Re: Hello IETF!

2007-09-15 Thread Marc Manthey



HI!

I'm 81duz1d0, programmer.

Today I’ve joined to IETF Mail List, I hope that my texts be  
useful to this community.


welcome 81duz1d0

your site ?

http://progzzz.blogspot.com/

greetings from germany

marc
--
there's no place like 127.0.0.1
until we found ::1 -- which is even bigger

web: http://www.let.de


___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Re: about RSVP : Admin hello disable.

2007-07-31 Thread Adrian Farrel

Hi,

This is a question you might want to take to the CCAMP and MPLS mailing 
lists. You might also ask the authors of the original I-D.


The draft you reference expired almost three years ago. I have seen no 
mention of this behavior in any subsequent I-D or RFC.


Cheers,
Adrian
- Original Message - 
From: shivakumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 3:13 AM
Subject: about RSVP : Admin hello disable.



Whener RSVP hello session is removed , is it necessary to Add Admin object
(class 196, Ctype 1)  to Hello message?

I have came across a draft  draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-hello-gr-admin-00 , 
which

mentions about adding such object ,but the draft is obsolete now.









;)..The philosophy of one century is the common sense of the next.











___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


about RSVP : Admin hello disable.

2007-07-30 Thread shivakumar
Whener RSVP hello session is removed , is it necessary to Add Admin object
(class 196, Ctype 1)  to Hello message?

I have came across a draft  draft-ali-ccamp-rsvp-hello-gr-admin-00 , which
mentions about adding such object ,but the draft is obsolete now.

 

 

 

 

;)..The philosophy of one century is the common sense of the next.

 

___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


RFC 4558 on Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement

2006-06-15 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 4558

Title:  Node-ID Based Resource Reservation Protocol 
(RSVP) Hello: A Clarification Statement 
Author: Z. Ali, R. Rahman,
D. Prairie, D. Papadimitriou
Status: Standards Track
Date:   June 2006
Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pages:  7
Characters: 14185
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4558.txt

Use of Node-ID based Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Hello
messages is implied in a number of cases, e.g., when data and control
planes are separated, when TE links are unnumbered.  Furthermore, when
link level failure detection is performed by some means other than
exchanging RSVP Hello messages, use of a Node-ID based Hello session is
optimal for detecting signaling adjacency failure for Resource
reSerVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE).  Nonetheless, this
implied behavior is unclear, and this document formalizes use of
the Node-ID based RSVP Hello session in some scenarios.  The procedure
described in this document applies to both Multi-Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) capable nodes.  [STANDARDS 
TRACK]

This document is a product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane
Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and 
suggestions for improvements.Please refer to the current edition of the 
Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization 
state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is 
unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body 

help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: getting rfcs

help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.

Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.


Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...



___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Protocol Action: 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement' to Proposed Standard

2006-03-07 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement '
   draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt as a Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane 
Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Alex Zinin and Bill Fenner.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt

Technical Summary
 
   Use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello messages is implied in a number of
   cases, e.g., when data and control plan are separated, when TE links
   are unnumbered. Furthermore, when link level failure detection is
   performed by some means other than exchanging RSVP Hello messages,
   use of Node-ID based Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling
   adjacency failure for Resource reSerVation Protocol-Traffic
   Engineering (RSVP-TE). Nonetheless, this implied behavior is unclear
   and this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session
   as a best current practice (BCP) in some scenarios. The procedure
   described in this document applies to both Multi-Protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) capable nodes.

 
Working Group Summary
 
 The WG had consensus on progressing this document.
 
Protocol Quality
 
 The document has been reviewed for the IESG by Alex Zinin.

Note to RFC Editor
 
 Abstract
Delete as a best current practice (BCP) as follows...
OLD
   Use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello messages is implied in a number of
   cases, e.g., when data and control plan are separated, when TE links
   are unnumbered. Furthermore, when link level failure detection is
   performed by some means other than exchanging RSVP Hello messages,
   use of Node-ID based Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling
   adjacency failure for Resource reSerVation Protocol-Traffic
   Engineering (RSVP-TE). Nonetheless, this implied behavior is unclear
   and this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session
   as a best current practice (BCP) in some scenarios. The procedure
   described in this document applies to both Multi-Protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) capable nodes.
NEW
   Use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello messages is implied in a number of
   cases, e.g., when data and control plan are separated, when TE links
   are unnumbered. Furthermore, when link level failure detection is
   performed by some means other than exchanging RSVP Hello messages,
   use of Node-ID based Hello session is optimal for detecting signaling
   adjacency failure for Resource reSerVation Protocol-Traffic
   Engineering (RSVP-TE). Nonetheless, this implied behavior is unclear
   and this document formalizes use of Node-ID based RSVP Hello session
   in some scenarios. The procedure described in this document applies to
   both Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS
   (GMPLS) capable nodes.


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement' to BCP

2005-10-27 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Common Control and Measurement Plane 
WG to consider the following document:

- 'Node ID based RSVP Hello: A Clarification Statement '
   draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt as a BCP

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-11-25.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-node-id-based-hello-02.txt


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


hello

2004-04-06 Thread shahram_davari
information about you
[Filename: creditcard.pif, Content-Type: application/octet-stream]
The attachment file in the message has been removed by eManager.


Hello

2004-03-25 Thread jaltman
--  Virus Warning Message (on ietf-mx)

Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file document.txt 
  .exe (in application.zip)
The uncleanable file is deleted.

-
I hope the patch works.


--  Virus Warning Message (on ietf-mx)

application.zip is removed from here because it contains a virus.

-

Re: Hello

2004-03-18 Thread ramku . sankar








hello

2004-02-22 Thread jnc
stuff about you?
[Filename: ranking.exe, Content-Type: application/octet-stream]
The attachment file in the message has been removed by eManager.


Hello,ietf,japanese girl VS playboy

2003-03-31 Thread internet-drafts
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=d_first[1].htm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: Z400S931Z3t
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Hello!who have the Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based on Intruder codes?

2001-11-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]



hello!
I need  codes about "Formal Authentication Model of Security Protocol Based 
on Intruder " 
who know or have them?some matrials also is important for me!
I am so nervous to programme these,wish to modify some codes to finish my 
tasks,
Thank you a lot!
 please contract with me!
 
yours Dav,Bob


Re: hello see this (DRP)

2001-10-04 Thread Randy Bush

 This is appalling. How can this be STOPPED?

un sub scribe




FW: FW: hello see this (DRP)

2001-10-04 Thread Willis, Scott L


Just an FYI...I thought you might like to know



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Willis, Scott L
Subject: Re: FW: hello see this (DRP)


This is a Nigerian letter.  This is a scam which has been going on for
years.
The matter is being investigated by the U. S. Secret Service.

Willis, Scott L wrote:

 Hello,

 This may not be anything, but is sure sounds like it could use a good
 once-over from A federal law enforcement agency.  It arrived in my e-mail
as
 a massed mailed e-note to the IETF (Internet Engineers Task Force). If you
 think is worth looking into, The original e-mail may be traceable through
 www.IETF.org  Sorry If I have wasted anyone's time, but I tend to be more
 AWARE of things these days as I'm sure all Americans are.

 Have a nice day  :)

 Scott Lee Willis

 Systems Engineer contracted to: Qwest 4650 Lakehurst CT Dublin,OH 43017
 3rd floor 3N263 phone 614.215.4007  fax 614.336.5677
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: mekudi jasper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:47 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: hello see this (DRP)

 DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES
 PLOT 225 KOFO ABAYOMI STREET VICTORIA ISLAND,LAGOS, NIGERIA.
 DIRECT FAX: 234 1 7590904. TEL; 234 -1- 7591519


  October 3, 2001

 ATTENTION : THE PRESIDENT/C.E.O

 RE: URGENT  CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL

 Dear Sir,

 I am DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP) Member Contract Award Committee of the above
 Department

 Terms of Reference

 My term of reference involves the award of contracts to multinational
 companies.

 My office is saddled with the responsibility of contract award, screening,
 categorization and prioritization of projects embarked upon by Department
of

 Petroleum Resources (DPR) as well as feasibility studies for selected
 projects
 and supervising the project consultants involved. A breakdown of the
fiscal
 expenditure by this office as at the end of last fiscal quarter of 2000
 indicates that DPR paid out a whooping sum of US$736M(Seven Hundred And
 Thirty
 Six Million, United States Dollars) to successful contract beneficiaries.
 The
 DPR is now compiling beneficiaries to be paid for the fourth Quarter of
 2001.

 The crux of this letter is that the finance/contract department of the DPR
 deliberately over -invoiced the contract value of the various contracts
 awarded.
 In the course of disbursements, this department has been able to
accumulate
 the
 sum of US$38.2M(Thirty-eight Million, two hundred Thousand U.S Dollars) as
 the
 over-invoiced sum. This money is currently in a suspense account of the
DPR
 account with the Debt Reconciliation Committee (DRC). We now seek to
process
 the
 transfer of this fund officially as contract payment to you as a foreign
 contractor, who will be fronting for us as the beneficiary of the fund. In
 this
 way we can facilitate these funds into your nominated account for possible
 investment abroad. We are not allowed as a matter of government policy to
 operate any foreign account to transfer this fund into.

 However, for your involvement in assisting us with this transfer into your
 nominated account we have evolved a sharing formula as follows:
 (1) 20% for you as the foreign partner
 (2) 75% for I and my colleagues
 (3) 5% will be set aside to defray all incidental expenses both
Locally
 and
 Internationally during the course of this transaction.

 We shall be relying on your advice as regard investment of our share in
any
 business in your country. Be informed that this business is genuine and
100%

 safe considering the high-power government officials involved. Send your
 private
 fax/telephone numbers. Upon your response we shall provide you with
further
 information on the procedures. Feel free to send response by Fax:
 234-1-7590904 /
  TEL: 234-1-7591519 expecting your response urgently. All enquiries should
 be
 directed to the undersigned by FAX ,E-MAIL OR PHONE.
 Looking forward to a good business relationship with you.

 Sincerely,
 DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP)







 Oh, by the way, make the best Search Engine on the Internet, your
startpage.
 Click on this link: http://www.searchalot.com/homepage.htm




hello see this (DRP)

2001-10-03 Thread mekudi jasper


DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES 
PLOT 225 KOFO ABAYOMI STREET VICTORIA ISLAND,LAGOS, NIGERIA.
DIRECT FAX: 234 1 7590904. TEL; 234 –1- 7591519

 October 3, 2001

ATTENTION : THE PRESIDENT/C.E.O

RE: URGENT  CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL

Dear Sir,
 
I am DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP) Member Contract Award Committee of the above 
Department

Terms of Reference

My term of reference involves the award of contracts to multinational companies.


My office is saddled with the responsibility of contract award, screening, 
categorization and prioritization of projects embarked upon by Department of 
Petroleum Resources (DPR) as well as feasibility studies for selected projects 
and supervising the project consultants involved. A breakdown of the fiscal 
expenditure by this office as at the end of last fiscal quarter of 2000 
indicates that DPR paid out a whooping sum of US$736M(Seven Hundred And Thirty 
Six Million, United States Dollars) to successful contract beneficiaries. The 
DPR is now compiling beneficiaries to be paid for the fourth Quarter of 2001.

The crux of this letter is that the finance/contract department of the DPR 
deliberately over –invoiced the contract value of the various contracts awarded. 
In the course of disbursements, this department has been able to accumulate the 
sum of US$38.2M(Thirty-eight Million, two hundred Thousand U.S Dollars) as the 
over-invoiced sum. This money is currently in a suspense account of the DPR 
account with the Debt Reconciliation Committee (DRC). We now seek to process the 
transfer of this fund officially as contract payment to you as a foreign 
contractor, who will be fronting for us as the beneficiary of the fund. In this 
way we can facilitate these funds into your nominated account for possible 
investment abroad. We are not allowed as a matter of government policy to 
operate any foreign account to transfer this fund into.

However, for your involvement in assisting us with this transfer into your 
nominated account we have evolved a sharing formula as follows:
(1) 20% for you as the foreign partner
(2) 75% for I and my colleagues
(3) 5% will be set aside to defray all incidental expenses both Locally and 
Internationally during the course of this transaction.

We shall be relying on your advice as regard investment of our share in any 
business in your country. Be informed that this business is genuine and 100% 
safe considering the high-power government officials involved. Send your private 
fax/telephone numbers. Upon your response we shall provide you with further 
information on the procedures. Feel free to send response by Fax: 234-1-7590904 /
 TEL: 234-1-7591519 expecting your response urgently. All enquiries should be 
directed to the undersigned by FAX ,E-MAIL OR PHONE.
Looking forward to a good business relationship with you.

Sincerely,
DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP)








 

 
 
 


Oh, by the way, make the best Search Engine on the Internet, your startpage. Click on 
this link: http://www.searchalot.com/homepage.htm




Re: hello see this (DRP)

2001-10-03 Thread c . c . ololo

All,

This is appalling. How can this be STOPPED??? Any ideas please. In my view, I think 
the IETF board should take it to the appropriate
authorities since the source of the message can be traced.

Cel

mekudi jasper wrote:

 DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES
 PLOT 225 KOFO ABAYOMI STREET VICTORIA ISLAND,LAGOS, NIGERIA.
 DIRECT FAX: 234 1 7590904. TEL; 234 –1- 7591519

  October 3, 2001

 ATTENTION : THE PRESIDENT/C.E.O

 RE: URGENT  CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL

 Dear Sir,

 I am DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP) Member Contract Award Committee of the above
 Department

 Terms of Reference

 My term of reference involves the award of contracts to multinational companies.

 My office is saddled with the responsibility of contract award, screening,
 categorization and prioritization of projects embarked upon by Department of
 Petroleum Resources (DPR) as well as feasibility studies for selected projects
 and supervising the project consultants involved. A breakdown of the fiscal
 expenditure by this office as at the end of last fiscal quarter of 2000
 indicates that DPR paid out a whooping sum of US$736M(Seven Hundred And Thirty
 Six Million, United States Dollars) to successful contract beneficiaries. The
 DPR is now compiling beneficiaries to be paid for the fourth Quarter of 2001.

 The crux of this letter is that the finance/contract department of the DPR
 deliberately over –invoiced the contract value of the various contracts awarded.
 In the course of disbursements, this department has been able to accumulate the
 sum of US$38.2M(Thirty-eight Million, two hundred Thousand U.S Dollars) as the
 over-invoiced sum. This money is currently in a suspense account of the DPR
 account with the Debt Reconciliation Committee (DRC). We now seek to process the
 transfer of this fund officially as contract payment to you as a foreign
 contractor, who will be fronting for us as the beneficiary of the fund. In this
 way we can facilitate these funds into your nominated account for possible
 investment abroad. We are not allowed as a matter of government policy to
 operate any foreign account to transfer this fund into.

 However, for your involvement in assisting us with this transfer into your
 nominated account we have evolved a sharing formula as follows:
 (1) 20% for you as the foreign partner
 (2) 75% for I and my colleagues
 (3) 5% will be set aside to defray all incidental expenses both Locally and
 Internationally during the course of this transaction.

 We shall be relying on your advice as regard investment of our share in any
 business in your country. Be informed that this business is genuine and 100%
 safe considering the high-power government officials involved. Send your private
 fax/telephone numbers. Upon your response we shall provide you with further
 information on the procedures. Feel free to send response by Fax: 234-1-7590904 /
  TEL: 234-1-7591519 expecting your response urgently. All enquiries should be
 directed to the undersigned by FAX ,E-MAIL OR PHONE.
 Looking forward to a good business relationship with you.

 Sincerely,
 DR. Mekudi Waziri (JP)







 Oh, by the way, make the best Search Engine on the Internet, your startpage. Click 
on this link: http://www.searchalot.com/homepage.htm




RE: hello.

2001-03-22 Thread Arief Hamdani Gunawan

What can we do for you?

-
Arief Hamdani Gunawan
RisTI - PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia

-Original Message-
From:  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hello.


help

_
.Web180/
link: http://cn.tf?263b




hello.

2001-03-19 Thread ÂÞ³É

help

_
ÍøÉ϶©»¨È«¹úËÍ   http://shopping.263.net/category12.htm
ÊýÂë²úÆ·£¬ÜöÝÍÕ¹Âô   http://shopping.263.net/category21.htm




Hello

2000-04-23 Thread Ozair

Hello everyone,

My name is Mohammad Ozair Rasheed. I joined this list a few days back in
hope of understanding various protocol issues present in this forum. Here is
a brief look at me.

I am from Pakistan and work for a software house at the city of Lahore
(www.cres-tech.com) as the Senior Systems Analyst. Currently I am working as
the Project Coordinator for implementing the Database and Data Warehouse
Portion of the National Data Warehouse Project. I am also a volunteer member
for PMI and am working in a team for developing the Project Management
Principles for PMI.

Well, that is a brief information about me. It would be very helpful if any
one of you could provide me with background information about this list and
the topics that have been under discussion. I would very much like to add
value to the discussions.

Regards,
M. Ozair Rasheed
Pakistan.