Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-29 Thread Christopher Evans 
.net is a suite of coding  publishing tools.  maybe should throw together a .org 
suite of freeware coding tools?  


10/29/02 2:54:02 AM, Sean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Good Morning  Valdis
I have been cogitating on this for a little while. (Especially as I didn't want to 
sound thick when replying)

Why would MS (or anyone for that matter) want multiple pointer records when one 
will suffice. My thoughts revolved around clustered servers, .net  etc In short 
the Microsoft-verse.

RE: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-29 Thread Franck Martin 
And there is the mondo(?) project at ximian.com. Having .net running on
linux all in opensource.

Cheers.

 -Original Message-
 From: Lloyd Wood [mailto:l.wood;EIM.SURREY.AC.UK]
 Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 9:29 
 To: Christopher Evans
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
 
 
 On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Christopher Evans wrote:
 
  .net is a suite of coding  publishing tools.  maybe should throw
  together a .org suite of freeware coding tools?
 
 what, like www.gnu.org? www.fsf.org?
 
 where have you been?
 
 L.
 
 http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

2002-10-22 Thread Chris Evans 
access-list 100 deny ip 207.46.230.218 0.0.0.0 12.246.56.92 0.0.0.0 gt 1
access-list 100 permit ip any any

oh well.  :)

10/21/02 9:37:42 AM, Haren Visavadia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

If Microsoft can not produce secure products, what chance is there of
them producing a secure protocol?

IETF is more experienced than Microsoft at producing protocols.