Time for a sign-up campaign [Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary]
I hereby extend the rights in my contributions that I have personally granted in the past to the IETF and to the IETF Trust to include the additional rights required by RFC5378. Obviously by doing so, I cannot extend the rights granted by my various employers. I'm going to print the updated license from http://trustee.ietf.org/authorlic.html and sign it and send it in. (My name is there because I signed the older version.) I'm disappointed at how few people have signed up. Even people who've been active in this debate haven't signed up to the old version. We should surely all be signing up to the new version, if we've ever made any kind of contribution in the past. We should all be pressing our employers to sign up. The problem that Sam raised will become a minor concern if the vast majority of us sign up. Brian Carpenter ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Time for a sign-up campaign [Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary]
At 8:56 AM +1300 12/13/08, Brian E Carpenter wrote: I'm disappointed at how few people have signed up. +1. The Trust even had cookies in the room when I signed my old form. New form is on the way to them. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Re: Time for a sign-up campaign [Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary]
I'm disappointed at how few people have signed up. Even people who've been active in this debate haven't signed up to the old version. I signed the old form (on paper) and handed it in a while back but do not see my name on the list -- did a bit get dropped somewhere? Scott ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf