Impending publication: draft-iab-dns-choices-05

2008-02-29 Thread Olaf Kolkman


The IAB is ready to ask the RFC-Editor to publish

 Design Choices When Expanding DNS
   draft-iab-dns-choices-05


as an Informational RFC.  This document provides a number of
considerations to assist application and protocol designers in
choosing a mechanism to store and retrieve data in the DNS. It treats,
among other things the pros and cons of using TXT records, and of
adding prefixes or suffixes to owner names. It argues that adding an
new Resource Record is the best solution to add new data to the DNS
and that the use of TXT Resource Records is the worst.

The IAB solicits comments by February 23, 2008. Please send
comments to the IAB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The document can be found at

   
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-dns-choices-03.txt


 From the Abstract:

   This note discusses how to extend the DNS with new data for a new
   application.  DNS extension discussions too often focus on reuse of
   the TXT Resource Record Type.  This document lists different
   mechanisms to extend the DNS, and concludes that the use of a new DNS
   Resource Record Type is the best solution.




Olaf Kolkman,
  For the IAB.
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy (Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key (EMSK)) to Proposed Standard

2008-02-29 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Handover Keying WG (hokey) to 
consider the following document:

- 'Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master
   Session Key (EMSK) '
   draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists by 2008-03-21. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hokey-emsk-hierarchy-04.txt



IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=15627rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


RFC 5098 on Signaling MIB for PacketCable and IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs)

2008-02-29 Thread rfc-editor

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 5098

Title:  Signaling MIB for PacketCable and 
IPCablecom Multimedia Terminal Adapters (MTAs) 
Author: G. Beacham, S. Kumar,
S. Channabasappa
Status: Standards Track
Date:   February 2008
Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pages:  79
Characters: 159415
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-signaling-15.txt

URL:http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5098.txt

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it defines a basic set of managed objects for Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)-based management of PacketCable-
and IPCablecom-compliant Multimedia Terminal Adapter devices.  
[STANDARDS TRACK]

This document is a product of the IP over Cable Data Network Working Group of 
the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body 

help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: getting rfcs

help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.

Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...


___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce