Last Call: draft-ietf-rmt-pi-alc-revised (Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) Protocol Instantiation) to Proposed Standard

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Reliable Multicast Transport WG 
(rmt) to consider the following document:

- 'Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) Protocol Instantiation '
   draft-ietf-rmt-pi-alc-revised-08.txt as a Proposed Standard

This document has a normative reference to RFC 3738: Wave and 
Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building Block an Experimental RFC. 
Please consider the appropriateness of this downward reference. 
See RFC 3967 for additional information about this. 

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-22. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmt-pi-alc-revised-08.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=13396rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Document Action: 'Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport Networks' to Informational RFC

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport Networks '
   draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04.txt as an Informational RFC


This document is the product of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Ralph Droms and Jari Arkko.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04.txt

Technical Summary

  A requirement has been identified by the operator community for the
  transparent carriage of the MPLS(-TP) network of one party over the
  MPLS(-TP) network of another party.  This document describes a
  method of satisfying this need using the existing PWE3 Ethernet
  pseudowire standard RFC4448.

Working Group Summary

  The draft originated as a response to the work that was then going
  on in the ITU to apply MPLS to transport networks. It reflected a
  desire to illustrate how IETF defined pseudowires could be applied
  to the problem of packet transport. Since that time, the development
  of MPLS-TP has proceeded in the IETF in close cooperation with the
  ITU-T. This draft addresses a sub-set of the MPLS-TP requirements
  using a limited set of existing MPLS and Pseudowire functionality,
  as defined in the IETF, but is not intended as a comprehensive
  standard for MPLS-TP per-se. The draft was widely reviewed by
  participants in the IETF MPLS-TP effort, as well as the MPLS and
  PWE3 WGs.

Document Quality

  There are no concerns about protocol quality. There are understood
  to be implementations of this protocol.

Personnel

   Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Who is the 
   Responsible Area Director?  If the document requires IANA
   experts(s), insert 'The IANA Expert(s) for the registries
   in this document are TO BE ADDED BY THE AD.'

RFC Editor Note

Please make the following two changes to
draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04.txt before publication.
===
Abstract

OLD
  A requirement has been identified by the operator community for the
  transparent carriage of the MPLS(-TP) network of one party over the
  MPLS(-TP) network of another party.  This document describes a method
  of satisfying this need using the existing PWE3 Ethernet pseudowire
  standard RFC4448.
NEW
  Ethernet pseudowires are widely deployed to support packet transport
  of Ethernet services. These services in-turn provide transport
  for a variety of client networks e.g. IP and MPLS. This document uses
  procedures defined in the existing IETF specifications of Ethernet
  pseudowires carried over MPLS networks.

  Many of the requirements for the services provided by the mechanisms
  explained in this document, are also recognized by the MPLS transport
  profile (MPLS-TP) design effort formed jointly by the IETF and ITU-T.
  The solution described here does not address all of the MPLS-TP
  requirements, but it provides a viable form of packet transport
  service using tools that are already available.

  This document also serves as an indication that existing MPLS
  techniques form an appropriate basis for the design of a fully-
  featured packet transport solution addressing all of the requirements
  of MPLS-TP.
===

Section 1

OLD
  The operator community has identified the need for the transparent
  carriage of the MPLS(-TP) network of one party over the MPLS(-TP)
  network of another party [I-D.ietf-mpls-tp-requirements].  This
  document describes one mechanism to satisfy this requirement using
  existing IETF standards such as PWE3 Ethernet pseudowire standard
  [RFC4448] .  The mechanism described here fulfills the MPLS-TP
  requirements for transparent carriage (MPLS-TP requirements 30  31)
  of the Ethernet data plane.

  The key purpose of this document is to demonstrate that there is an
  existing IETF mechanism with known implementations that satisfies the
  requirements posed by the operator community.  It is recognised that
  it is possible to design a more efficient method of satisfying the
  requirements, and the IETF anticipates that improved solutions will
  be proposed in the future.
NEW
  Ethernet pseudowires are widely deployed to support packet transport
  of Ethernet services. These services in-turn provide transport
  for a variety of client networks e.g. IP and MPLS. This document uses
  procedures defined in the existing IETF specifications of Ethernet
  pseudowires carried over MPLS networks.

  Many of the requirements for the services provided by the mechanisms
  explained in this document, are also recognized by the MPLS transport
  profile (MPLS-TP) design effort formed jointly by the IETF and ITU-T
  [I-D.ietf-mpls-tp-requirements]. For example, the ability to operate
  solely with netowrk management control, the ability to use
  Operations, Adminstration and Maintenance (OAM) that does not rely on
  IP forwarding, and the ability to provide light-weight proactive
  connection verification (CV) functionality.

  The 

Last Call: draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana (Updated IANA Considerations for Diameter Command Code Allocations) to Proposed Standard

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Diameter Maintenance and 
Extensions WG (dime) to consider the following document:

- 'Updated IANA Considerations for Diameter Command Code Allocations '
   draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01.txt as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-22. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=18633rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256 (Use of SHA-2 algorithms with RSA in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC) to Proposed Standard

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the DNS Extensions WG (dnsext) to 
consider the following document:

- 'Use of SHA-2 algorithms with RSA in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records 
   for DNSSEC '
   draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-14.txt as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-22. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-rsasha256-14.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=14237rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6 (Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Mobility for IP: Performance, 
Signaling and Handoff Optimization WG (mipshop) to consider the following 
document:

- 'Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 '
   draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-09.txt as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-22. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-09.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=17914rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


Last Call: draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-reqts (Requirements for Federated File Systems) to Informational RFC

2009-09-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Network File System Version 4 WG 
(nfsv4) to consider the following document:

- 'Requirements for Federated File Systems '
   draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-reqts-03.txt as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-22. Exceptionally, 
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please 
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-reqts-03.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_iddTag=17723rfc_flag=0

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce