[indiana-discuss] BE not activate during update from svn_99 to latest (hopefully 08.11 RC1)

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Having problems getting an x4500 updated from snv_99 to the latest.  (I 
would like to upgrade to the 2008.11 Release Candidates, if at all 
possible).

Here's what I'm running now:
SunOS sutl500p 5.11 snv_99 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris

Here's what I'm doing to upgrade.  ANy ideas on why this is breaking are 
greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Tom

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg refresh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No updates available for this image.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No updates available for this image.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pkg install SUNWipkg-gui
No updates available for this image.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd /tmp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# ls
ogl_select284
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# pkg image-update
DOWNLOADPKGS   FILES XFER (MB)
Completed625/625 20563/20563 455.20/455.20

PHASEACTIONS
Removal Phase  9721/9721
Install Phase18601/18601
Update Phase 16416/16416
PHASE  ITEMS
Reading Existing Index   9/9
Indexing Packages625/625
pkg: unable to activate opensolaris-3

---
NOTE: Please review release notes posted at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/
---
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Re: [indiana-discuss] BE not activate during update from svn_99 to latest (hopefully 08.11 RC1)

2008-11-19 Thread Ethan Quach


Tom Georgoulias wrote:
 Having problems getting an x4500 updated from snv_99 to the latest.  (I 
 would like to upgrade to the 2008.11 Release Candidates, if at all 
 possible).
 
 Here's what I'm running now:
 SunOS sutl500p 5.11 snv_99 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
 
 Here's what I'm doing to upgrade.  ANy ideas on why this is breaking are 
 greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Tom
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg refresh
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.

Since you're running b99, these should have been @0.5.11,0.5.11-0.99

But I'm not sure if that would have made a difference in the BE
activation failure.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pkg install SUNWipkg-gui
 No updates available for this image.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cd /tmp
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# ls
 ogl_select284
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# pkg image-update
 DOWNLOADPKGS   FILES XFER (MB)
 Completed625/625 20563/20563 455.20/455.20
 
 PHASEACTIONS
 Removal Phase  9721/9721
 Install Phase18601/18601
 Update Phase 16416/16416
 PHASE  ITEMS
 Reading Existing Index   9/9
 Indexing Packages625/625
 pkg: unable to activate opensolaris-3


If you get here, the new BE has been created and updated successfully,
just not activated.  Can you try to activate it from the command line
and see what errors come out (you may need to turn on the BE debug
to get more useful data):

# BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3


-ethan

 
 ---
 NOTE: Please review release notes posted at:
 http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/
 ---
 ___
 indiana-discuss mailing list
 indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Re: [indiana-discuss] BE not activate during update from svn_99 to latest (hopefully 08.11 RC1)

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Ethan Quach wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg refresh
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.
 
 Since you're running b99, these should have been @0.5.11,0.5.11-0.99

Makes sense.  Might be worth updating the notes here, they will have the 
0.86 number in them:

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/


 If you get here, the new BE has been created and updated successfully,
 just not activated.  Can you try to activate it from the command line
 and see what errors come out (you may need to turn on the BE debug
 to get more useful data):
 
 # BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3

Here you go, looks like it doesn't like the rpool setup or something.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# beadm list
BEActive Mountpoint Space  Policy Created
---- -- -  -- ---
opensolaris   -  -  12.25M static 2008-10-14 14:49
opensolaris-2 NR /  8.81G  static 2008-10-15 10:35
opensolaris-3 -  /tmp/tmp6tfVpN 1.51G  static 2008-11-19 10:23
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3
be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c9t0d0s0.
Unable to activate opensolaris-3. Unknown external error.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zpool status rpool
   pool: rpool
  state: ONLINE
  scrub: none requested
config:

NAME  STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE   0 0 0
  mirror  ONLINE   0 0 0
c9t4d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
c9t0d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Re: [indiana-discuss] BE not activate during update from svn_99 to latest (hopefully 08.11 RC1)

2008-11-19 Thread Cindy . Swearingen
Hi Tom,

Can you confirm that c9t0d0s0 has a VTOC label rather than an EFI label?

If c9t0d0s0 has an EFI label, then you will need to do the procedure
described below.

Cindy

1. Detach the disk.

# zpool detach rpool c9t0d0s0

2. Relabel the disk.

# format -e c9t0d0s0
format label
[0] SMI Label
[1] EFI Label
Specify Label type[1]: 0
Ready to label disk, continue? yes
format quit

3.  Attach the disk.

# zpool attach rpool c9t4d0s0 c9t0d0s0


Tom Georgoulias wrote:
 Ethan Quach wrote:
 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg refresh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No updates available for this image.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No updates available for this image.

Since you're running b99, these should have been @0.5.11,0.5.11-0.99
 
 
 Makes sense.  Might be worth updating the notes here, they will have the 
 0.86 number in them:
 
 http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/
 
 
 
If you get here, the new BE has been created and updated successfully,
just not activated.  Can you try to activate it from the command line
and see what errors come out (you may need to turn on the BE debug
to get more useful data):

# BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3
 
 
 Here you go, looks like it doesn't like the rpool setup or something.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# beadm list
 BEActive Mountpoint Space  Policy Created
 ---- -- -  -- ---
 opensolaris   -  -  12.25M static 2008-10-14 14:49
 opensolaris-2 NR /  8.81G  static 2008-10-15 10:35
 opensolaris-3 -  /tmp/tmp6tfVpN 1.51G  static 2008-11-19 10:23
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3
 be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c9t0d0s0.
 Unable to activate opensolaris-3. Unknown external error.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
   state: ONLINE
   scrub: none requested
 config:
 
   NAME  STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
   rpool ONLINE   0 0 0
 mirror  ONLINE   0 0 0
   c9t4d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
   c9t0d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
 
 errors: No known data errors
 ___
 indiana-discuss mailing list
 indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss


Re: [indiana-discuss] BE not activate during update from svn_99 to latest (hopefully 08.11 RC1)

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Georgoulias
Thank you Cindy, that corrected the problem.

Fixed the label, activated the boot environment, and rebooted the server.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a
SunOS sutl500p 5.11 snv_101a i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris


Tom

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Tom,
 
 Can you confirm that c9t0d0s0 has a VTOC label rather than an EFI label?
 
 If c9t0d0s0 has an EFI label, then you will need to do the procedure
 described below.
 
 Cindy
 
 1. Detach the disk.
 
 # zpool detach rpool c9t0d0s0
 
 2. Relabel the disk.
 
 # format -e c9t0d0s0
 format label
 [0] SMI Label
 [1] EFI Label
 Specify Label type[1]: 0
 Ready to label disk, continue? yes
 format quit
 
 3.  Attach the disk.
 
 # zpool attach rpool c9t4d0s0 c9t0d0s0
 
 
 Tom Georgoulias wrote:
 Ethan Quach wrote:


 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg refresh
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# pfexec pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 No updates available for this image.

 Since you're running b99, these should have been @0.5.11,0.5.11-0.99


 Makes sense.  Might be worth updating the notes here, they will have 
 the 0.86 number in them:

 http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/



 If you get here, the new BE has been created and updated successfully,
 just not activated.  Can you try to activate it from the command line
 and see what errors come out (you may need to turn on the BE debug
 to get more useful data):

 # BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3


 Here you go, looks like it doesn't like the rpool setup or something.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# beadm list
 BEActive Mountpoint Space  Policy Created
 ---- -- -  -- ---
 opensolaris   -  -  12.25M static 2008-10-14 14:49
 opensolaris-2 NR /  8.81G  static 2008-10-15 10:35
 opensolaris-3 -  /tmp/tmp6tfVpN 1.51G  static 2008-11-19 10:23
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolaris-3
 be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c9t0d0s0.
 Unable to activate opensolaris-3. Unknown external error.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
   state: ONLINE
   scrub: none requested
 config:

 NAME  STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
 rpool ONLINE   0 0 0
   mirror  ONLINE   0 0 0
 c9t4d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0
 c9t0d0s0  ONLINE   0 0 0

 errors: No known data errors
 ___
 indiana-discuss mailing list
 indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
 


-- 
Tom Georgoulias
Senior Systems Engineer
McClatchy Interactive
desk: 919-861-1267
AIM: tgeorgouliasmi
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss