[infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread Jeff Ramsdale
I've posted https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-65 to address an
issue I've run into converting to Infinispan 5.0.0.CR5. The issue
concerns the switch to JBoss Logging and its failure to support
log4j-over-slf4j, a jar provided by slf4j to adapt log4j events and
route them to slf4j.

JBoss Logging doesn't detect that org.apache.log4j.LogManager is
provided by the log4j-over-slf4j jar and selects the
Log4jLoggerProvider instead of the Slf4jLoggerProvider.

I still haven't nailed down what's going on with logging in Infinispan
5.0.0 but I'm not getting any logging output and have run into several
issues. See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1177 as well (it
seems Maven 3 is required to build Infinispan 5?). I have concerns
that folks converting from 4.x will have issues as I have and wanted
to raise a red flag before release. Anybody else seeing a degradation
in logging behavior?

-jeff
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


Re: [infinispan-dev] Partial state transfer

2011-06-20 Thread Manik Surtani
5.1 is possible, 5.0 would be very tough.

What are the implications for our current implementation on 5.0 though?  State 
going missing?

On 16 Jun 2011, at 17:56, Bela Ban wrote:

 Correct. Time frame would ideally be 5.0, but realistically it will 
 probably be 5.1. Is that feasible from a roadmap point of view ?
 
 On 6/16/11 6:47 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
 In another words the essential problem is that digest and channel state
 are per channel abstractions and they do not fit nicely with higher
 level abstractions like substates? We use partial state transfer in
 Infinispan and we need to address this.
 
 What is the time frame here? 5.0 final release?
 
 Vladimir
 
 On 11-06-15 11:39 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
 I looked into adding partial state transfer back into JGroups, but found
 out that partial state transfer is fundamentally flawed, something I've
 always suspected ! (Regular state transfer is correct, and has always
 been correct).
 
 - Say we have node A and B. B requests the state from A
 - There are partial states X and Y
 - Message M1 modifies X, M2 modifies Y
 
 Here's what happens:
 
 T1: A multicasts M1
 T2: A delivers M1, and changes X
 T3: B sends a GET_STATE(Y) request to A // partial state request
 for state Y
 T4: A multicasts M2
 T5: A delivers M2, changing Y
 T6: A receives the GET_STATE request, sends a SET_STATE response back
 including Y and the digest (including M1 and M2's seqnos)
 T7: B receives the SET_STATE response, sets its digest (includes now M1
 and M2) and state Y *BUT NOT* state X !
 T8: *** B receives M1, discards it because it is already in its digest
 ***
 T9: B receives M2, and also discards it
 
 
 At time T8, M1 (which would have changed state X) is discarded, because
 it is already in the digest sent with the SET_STATE response. Therefore
 state X is now incorrect, as M1 was never applied !
 
 As a summary, if we get a number of updates to partial states, and don't
 receive all of them before requesting the partial state, the last update
 includes in the digest wins...
 
 I'm a real idiot, as I've written this down before, in 2006: see [1] for
 details.
 
 In a nutshell, [1] shows that partial state transfer doesn't work,
 unless virtual synchrony (FLUSH) is used.
 
 So I propose Infinispan and JBoss AS look into how they can replace
 their use of partial state transfer. I suggest Infinispan uses the same
 approach already used for state transfer with mode=distribution.
 
 Opinions ?
 
 [1]
 https://github.com/belaban/JGroups/blob/master/doc/design/PartialStateTransfer.txt
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Bela Ban
 Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
 JBoss
 ___
 infinispan-dev mailing list
 infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Manik Surtani
ma...@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org




___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


Re: [infinispan-dev] Partial state transfer in Infinispan

2011-06-20 Thread Manik Surtani

On 17 Jun 2011, at 13:49, Mircea Markus wrote:

 
 But yes, there is no reason why we can't replace this with RPC as per 
 Distribution, however I think we do need a streaming solution - not just for 
 replication but distribution as well.  As such I'd only want to re-implement 
 this bit once, rather than a temp RPC based solution first.  So we need a 
 mechanism to either:
 Now this might sound a bit too radical but do we really need REPLICATED mode?

Yes.  :-)  REPL is ideal for certain common usage patterns: read-heavy, small 
clusters (under 10 nodes), small overall data volume (fits in any single JVM's 
heap).  This gives fast reads since reads are always local, etc.

 This is not fully brewed, but if e.g. we set numOwners = Integer.MAX_INTEGER 
 the cluster is effectively in replicated mode, so can't we just drop the 
 REPLICATION entirely? This would reduce the code size significantly...

We could in theory achieve this as you suggest with numOwners = MAX_INTEGER, 
but internally we'd still be best off implementing this as we have right now.  
Saves on a lot of overhead (memory as well as processing) compared to a 
DIST-like setup with an unlimited number of data owners.

 
 (1) open a separate TCP socket for the sake of streaming state, or
 (2) reuse the sockets JGroups opens.
 They both have their pros and cons.
 
 (1) is more configuration, firewall setup, and a spiderweb of connections in 
 a large grid
 (2) would mean multiplexing with JGroups' use of the socket.
 Having our own sockets might cause an administration complications. Also 
 borrowing sockets from jgroups doesn't seems nice...I'm not a fan of either 
 solution really: I think this should be transport's responsibility and we 
 should enhance jgroups to offer the streaming service.

Yes, it would be implemented in our Transport abstraction, for sure.  So code 
wouldn't leak, but all the same there is no hard requirement that JGroups 
provides this (since it could be impl'd in JGroupsTransport).


--
Manik Surtani
ma...@jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread David M. Lloyd
On 06/20/2011 04:16 PM, Thomas P. Fuller wrote:
 I've had an issue upgrading to CR5 and I was just about to ask about this.

 Basically when running infinispan CR5 in Grails I am seeing log messages
 repeated two times whereas before upgrading I'd only see one.

 This is not a showstopper, but it's a bit annoying. I'm also not sure if
 this is an Infinispan problem or a Grails problem, however this wasn't
 an issue until recently, which is why I suspect that JBoss Logging is at
 fault here.

Leaving aside the fact that this is basically a me too post which 
actually describes a completely different problem - can you give some 
specifics?  Like, what JARs are on your classpath where you see the 
problem?  Are all messages duplicated, or just Infinispan's?  What 
logging backend are you trying to use, and how is it configured?  What 
does the output actually look like, and what were you expecting?

-- 
- DML
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread Dan Berindei
Hi Jeff


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jeff Ramsdale jeff.ramsd...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've posted https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBLOGGING-65 to address an
 issue I've run into converting to Infinispan 5.0.0.CR5. The issue
 concerns the switch to JBoss Logging and its failure to support
 log4j-over-slf4j, a jar provided by slf4j to adapt log4j events and
 route them to slf4j.

 JBoss Logging doesn't detect that org.apache.log4j.LogManager is
 provided by the log4j-over-slf4j jar and selects the
 Log4jLoggerProvider instead of the Slf4jLoggerProvider.

 I still haven't nailed down what's going on with logging in Infinispan
 5.0.0 but I'm not getting any logging output and have run into several
 issues. See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1177 as well (it
 seems Maven 3 is required to build Infinispan 5?). I have concerns
 that folks converting from 4.x will have issues as I have and wanted
 to raise a red flag before release. Anybody else seeing a degradation
 in logging behavior?


I'm building Infinispan with Maven 2.2.1 on Fedora 14 and it works fine.
I haven't noticed ISPN-1177 before, but I do get the error from time
to time when I build from IntelliJ, because the IntelliJ compiler
doesn't do annotation processing (or at least I haven't been able to
configure it properly).
Then when you run 'mvn install' maven sees that the class is up to
date and doesn't run annotation processing either. Running 'mvn clean
install' usually sorts everything out.

Dan


 -jeff
 ___
 infinispan-dev mailing list
 infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread Thomas P. Fuller
David,

Leaving aside the fact that this is basically a me too post which actually  
describes a completely different problem - can you give some specifics?

Note that the author of the email asked specifically the following  question:

Anybody else seeing a degradation in logging behavior?

If you're an expert with the internals of JBoss Logging, then fine for you to 
categorize this as a different problem, but I am not and from my angle one user 
has a problem with JBoss Logging and so do I. It is perfectly conceivable that 
they could be related which is why I took the time to respond to this specific 
question.

Now, moving on to your queries:

Here are the list of Jars that are in the classpath:

hibernate-commons-annotations-3.2.0.Final.jar
hibernate-infinispan-3.6.4-20110430.213848-9.jar
hibernate-search-3.4.0.Final.jar
infinispan-core.jar
infinispan-query.jar
jboss-logging-3.0.0.Beta5.jar
jboss-marshalling-1.3.0.CR9.jar
jboss-marshalling-river-1.3.0.CR9.jar
jboss-transaction-api-1.0.1.GA.jar
jcip-annotations-1.0.jar
jgroups-2.12.0.Final.jar
lucene-core-3.2.0.jar
readme.txt
rhq-pluginAnnotations-3.0.1.jar

Re: Are all messages duplicated, or just Infinispan's?

All messages are duplicated, and I just wrote a quite test application in 
Grails 
in complete isolation and the log messages only appear once.

Regards,

Tom




From: David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com
To: infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Mon, 20 June, 2011 22:55:56
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

On 06/20/2011 04:16 PM, Thomas P. Fuller wrote:
 I've had an issue upgrading to CR5 and I was just about to ask about this.

 Basically when running infinispan CR5 in Grails I am seeing log messages
 repeated two times whereas before upgrading I'd only see one.

 This is not a showstopper, but it's a bit annoying. I'm also not sure if
 this is an Infinispan problem or a Grails problem, however this wasn't
 an issue until recently, which is why I suspect that JBoss Logging is at
 fault here.

Leaving aside the fact that this is basically a me too post which 
actually describes a completely different problem - can you give some 
specifics?  Like, what JARs are on your classpath where you see the 
problem?  Are all messages duplicated, or just Infinispan's?  What 
logging backend are you trying to use, and how is it configured?  What 
does the output actually look like, and what were you expecting?

-- 
- DML
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread Jeff Ramsdale
Hi Dan,

I didn't see any failures building with 2.2.1 but the jar seemed to
behave differently. In retrospect it's possible Eclipse was resolving
against a local project without APT running instead of against the
published artifact that contained the class. Wish I had more data, but
ultimately I'd rather use the published jars than my own anyway. Once
the blocking ISPN-1148 was resolved and new jar released I was able to
move back to the published artifacts.

Thanks for the feedback!

-jeff

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Dan Berindei dan.berin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Jeff

 I'm building Infinispan with Maven 2.2.1 on Fedora 14 and it works fine.
 I haven't noticed ISPN-1177 before, but I do get the error from time
 to time when I build from IntelliJ, because the IntelliJ compiler
 doesn't do annotation processing (or at least I haven't been able to
 configure it properly).
 Then when you run 'mvn install' maven sees that the class is up to
 date and doesn't run annotation processing either. Running 'mvn clean
 install' usually sorts everything out.

 Dan

___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

2011-06-20 Thread David M. Lloyd
Due to the lack of a logging backend JAR, I am assuming that you are 
using java.util.logging for your logging backend.  There is nothing in 
JBoss Logging which handles appenders or handlers or logs messages in a 
loop of any kind; thus I think the most likely situation is that there 
are multiple log backends being configured at a JUL level.  Apart from 
the obvious check the logging config file [1] [2], it's quite possible 
that one or more JARs on the classpath are helping you by configuring 
additional log handlers on JUL's root logger programmatically.  I can 
tell you that neither JBoss Logging nor JBoss Marshalling does this, but 
beyond that I cannot say.

[1] 
http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/guide/util/logging/overview.html
[2] http://www.crazysquirrel.com/computing/java/logging.jspx

On 06/20/2011 05:33 PM, Thomas P. Fuller wrote:
 David,

 Leaving aside the fact that this is basically a me too post which
 actually describes a completely different problem - can you give some
 specifics?

 Note that the author of the email asked specifically the following question:

 Anybody else seeing a degradation in logging behavior?

 If you're an expert with the internals of JBoss Logging, then fine for
 you to categorize this as a different problem, but I am not and from my
 angle one user has a problem with JBoss Logging and so do I. It is
 perfectly conceivable that they could be related which is why I took the
 time to respond to this specific question.

 Now, moving on to your queries:

 Here are the list of Jars that are in the classpath:

 hibernate-commons-annotations-3.2.0.Final.jar
 hibernate-infinispan-3.6.4-20110430.213848-9.jar
 hibernate-search-3.4.0.Final.jar
 infinispan-core.jar
 infinispan-query.jar
 jboss-logging-3.0.0.Beta5.jar
 jboss-marshalling-1.3.0.CR9.jar
 jboss-marshalling-river-1.3.0.CR9.jar
 jboss-transaction-api-1.0.1.GA.jar
 jcip-annotations-1.0.jar
 jgroups-2.12.0.Final.jar
 lucene-core-3.2.0.jar
 readme.txt
 rhq-pluginAnnotations-3.0.1.jar

 Re: Are all messages duplicated, or just Infinispan's?

 All messages are duplicated, and I just wrote a quite test application
 in Grails in complete isolation and the log messages only appear once.

 Regards,

 Tom

 
 *From:* David M. Lloyd david.ll...@redhat.com
 *To:* infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
 *Sent:* Mon, 20 June, 2011 22:55:56
 *Subject:* Re: [infinispan-dev] Issue posted for JBoss Logging and slf4j

 On 06/20/2011 04:16 PM, Thomas P. Fuller wrote:
   I've had an issue upgrading to CR5 and I was just about to ask about
 this.
  
   Basically when running infinispan CR5 in Grails I am seeing log messages
   repeated two times whereas before upgrading I'd only see one.
  
   This is not a showstopper, but it's a bit annoying. I'm also not sure if
   this is an Infinispan problem or a Grails problem, however this wasn't
   an issue until recently, which is why I suspect that JBoss Logging is at
   fault here.

 Leaving aside the fact that this is basically a me too post which
 actually describes a completely different problem - can you give some
 specifics? Like, what JARs are on your classpath where you see the
 problem? Are all messages duplicated, or just Infinispan's? What
 logging backend are you trying to use, and how is it configured? What
 does the output actually look like, and what were you expecting?

 --
 - DML
 ___
 infinispan-dev mailing list
 infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org mailto:infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



 ___
 infinispan-dev mailing list
 infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


-- 
- DML
___
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev