Re: Strange behaviour with cvs rlog and branch tag
At 11:07 13/08/2003 +0200, you wrote: OK, so may be I do not use the right command to get what I want. All I need is to list files that will be checkout if I use the specified tag (ie the list of files that will be displayed when I checkout but without actually checkout them). That's what I get if I use the cvs rlog command with the simple tag. But how get the list of files of a tagged branch? Do I need to use another command? Thanks in advance Maybe cvs -qn checkout -rBRANCH ? -- Julien It should work but I reveive the following error: cvs [checkout aborted]: there is no version here; run 'cvs checkout' first I searched google but found no solution with this problem Olivier ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Strange behaviour with cvs rlog and branch tag
At 11:36 12/08/2003 -0400, you wrote: Olivier Imbrechts writes: When listing files tagged with a branch tag I only get directories while it works fine with simple tag. Am I missing something or is it a bug? There aren't any revisions actually on the branch yet (the root is not on the branch), which is why you're not getting any results. I don't think that's a bug, but it might be possible to convince me otherwise. OK, so may be I do not use the right command to get what I want. All I need is to list files that will be checkout if I use the specified tag (ie the list of files that will be displayed when I checkout but without actually checkout them). That's what I get if I use the cvs rlog command with the simple tag. But how get the list of files of a tagged branch? Do I need to use another command? Thanks in advance Olivier ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Strange behaviour with cvs rlog and branch tag
Olivier Imbrechts writes: When listing files tagged with a branch tag I only get directories while it works fine with simple tag. Am I missing something or is it a bug? There aren't any revisions actually on the branch yet (the root is not on the branch), which is why you're not getting any results. I don't think that's a bug, but it might be possible to convince me otherwise. -Larry Jones From now on, I'm devoting myself to the cultivation of interpersonal relationships. -- Calvin ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Strange behaviour with cvs rlog and branch tag
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:36:42AM -0400, Larry Jones wrote: Olivier Imbrechts writes: When listing files tagged with a branch tag I only get directories while it works fine with simple tag. There aren't any revisions actually on the branch yet (the root is not on the branch), which is why you're not getting any results. I don't think that's a bug, but it might be possible to convince me otherwise. It seems to me that the root is on the branch, in the sense that cvs up -rBRANCH will yield it (i.e. it's on the branch in the CVS sense, even if not in the RCS sense). However, I can see wanting to ask either question: - For which files has someone actually committed something to the branch? - Which files have branch tag X, i.e. which files will be in my sandbox if I do cvs update -rX? So it's hard to argue that either of the two behaviours is correct or a bug; either one could be what the user's looking for. It's the same difference as that between cvs log -rX:Y and -rX::Y. -- | | /\ |-_|/ Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont.[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / When I came back around from the dark side, there in front of me would be the landing area where the crew was, and the Earth, all in the view of my window. I couldn't help but think that there in front of me was all of humanity, except me. - Michael Collins, Apollo 11 Command Module Pilot ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
