Delete all Mails in a folder from

2006-05-22 Thread Oliver Bohlen


Hi,

I want to delete all mails in a folder from a script. How can I do  
this. I triesd the ipurge command but there I have to specify what  
mails.
Isn't it possible to tell ipurge it schould delete alle Mails in the  
folder...?


Is there an other more elegant way to do this?

Regards,
Olli




Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Cyrus Murder 2.3 - questions/problems - update

2006-05-22 Thread Mirosław Jaworski
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:13 +0200, Mirosław Jaworski wrote:
 Problems:
 - mupdate eating cpu 

Update: seems that prot.c ( 1.82.2.13 ) patch made the day
for me ( concerning mupdate eating cpu time ).

Still have the problem with synchronizing mailboxes.db
between nodes though.

How often slave mupdate will update its config against the
master mupdate? Isn't is supposed to be realtime too
( as of now - when i add mailbox on node with slave mupdate
the node with master mupdate knows about it in no time )?

Is there any configuration option i can add, some mupdate
slave synchronization event to slave node(s) or something?

Regards

MJ

-- 
Miroslaw Psyborg Jaworski
GCS/IT d- s+:+ a C++$ UBI$ P+++$ L- E--- W++(+++)$ N++ o+ K- w-- O-
M- V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t 5? X+ R++ !tv b++(+++) DI++ D+ G e* h++ r+++ y?


Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Denny Schierz
hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:

  There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
  which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
  what you were after?

however, thunderbird is not an option, cause of missing calendar, todo
list and other several things. Also the contact manger from TB is
terrible. 

The other point is, the customer bought outlook so, they want use them.
But my main problem isn't solved. Cyrus need an option to purge mails.
From 100 Users, 95 don't purge the old mails via edit Purge
deleted :-(



-- 
Sicherheit verständlich http://www.sides.de
GnuPG Key
http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x2A5CE192AB7D3FE0


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Simon Matter
 hi,

 Am Donnerstag, den 18.05.2006, 14:34 +0200 schrieb H. Wilmer:

  There is an option (I believe under Edit) to 'Purge deleted messages'
  which permanently deletes messages marked as to be deleted - is this
  what you were after?

 however, thunderbird is not an option, cause of missing calendar, todo
 list and other several things. Also the contact manger from TB is
 terrible.

 The other point is, the customer bought outlook so, they want use them.
 But my main problem isn't solved. Cyrus need an option to purge mails.

Hm, no. Cyrus is an IMAP server and it is best used with an IMAP client. I
don't think there is something missing in Cyrus, but of course there is
much missing in Outlook to make it a real IMAP client.

 From 100 Users, 95 don't purge the old mails via edit Purge
 deleted :-(

Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.

Simon

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
 Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
 can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.

No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just strikes out 
the message in your message list. It's the most rediculous thing I have seen 
considering how every other email client out there works.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: sieve proxy

2006-05-22 Thread Rudy Gevaert

Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:

On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:07 +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:

I was wondering if there is a sieve proxy.  I'm partitionnning my 
userbase and redirecting every to the correct backup with perdition.


People who are doing the same. How are you redirecting sieve users to 
the correct mailstore?



we patched avelsieve to lookup correct backend the same way Perdition
does (LDAP in our case).

if you're using Murder, you don't have this problem, since it will proxy
managesieve, too.  (actually it will send a referal, not be a proxy, but
that should only affect your firewall rules.)



Thanks for you reply.  We are not going to use Murder.  We are going to 
use IMP and the Horde framework for Webmail.  We could hack it the same 
way.


However how do you resolve the ussues for non webmail clients?  (Or 
aren't there any gui sieve clients?)


Kind regards,

Rudy

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:13:56AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
 On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
  Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way you
  can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.
 
 No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just strikes out 
 the message in your message list. It's the most rediculous thing I have seen 
 considering how every other email client out there works.

Then outlook is up to standards with its users (the ones that forget to purge
the email). A perfect match.



Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Joseph Brennan



--On Monday, May 22, 2006 10:13 -0600 Warren Turkal 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:

Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that way
you can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.


No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just strikes
out  the message in your message list. It's the most rediculous thing I
have seen  considering how every other email client out there works.



Both clients I use show deleted messages with a line through them, and
neither one is Outlook.  Why would you call this ridiculous?  It's easy
to undelete by highlighting one and clicking undelete.  And it reminds
me they're still taking up space, which nudges me to expunge them every
so often.  I like controlling when my messages get wiped out.

Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology


(asstrike-trough, n.  Where donkeys dispose of their tricycles.)



Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Jill Williams
I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is  
so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only  
to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?  
I'd much rather have closer control over what my mail program is  
doing...


Jill Williams
Manager, Support Technologies Group
Columbia University Information Technology


On May 22, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Warren Turkal wrote:


On Monday 22 May 2006 09:43, Simon Matter wrote:
Isn't the default policy to move to trash in Outlook? I think that  
way you

can handle it without having the people to purge messages by hand.


No. The default in Outlook with an IMAP account is that it just  
strikes out
the message in your message list. It's the most rediculous thing I  
have seen

considering how every other email client out there works.

wt
--
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html



Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

2006-05-22 Thread Patrick Radtke


On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:


On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:


On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master  
mailboxes.db from my backend server.

skiplist - 20-25 minutes
berkeley - 3 minutes




How many mailboxes are there?

Is there also a speed difference when running
'time ctl_mboxlist -mw'

from your backends?

-Patrick

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

2006-05-22 Thread Andrew Morgan

On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:



On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:


On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:


On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master mailboxes.db from 
my backend server.

skiplist - 20-25 minutes
berkeley - 3 minutes




How many mailboxes are there?


About 145000.


Is there also a speed difference when running
'time ctl_mboxlist -mw'

from your backends?


That's what I did.  :)

Andy

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:45, you wrote:
 I'm not sure I understand why you think marking deleted messages is  
 so bad. Have you never accidentally deleted the wrong message? Only  
 to have it totally disappear, so you're not SURE what you deleted?  
 I'd much rather have closer control over what my mail program is  
 doing...

My email clients put deleted messages into a trash bin. I can go there to 
retrieve messages. The fact of the matter is that most of the time someone 
deletes a message, they mean to do it. I believe that having an undo in case 
someone deletes the message accidentally is important. I just think the way 
that feature is implemented in Outlook for IMAP cripples the common use case 
where someone means to delete a message.

Outlook does a very sane thing with POP mail. It moves the message to the 
trash folder. It does something similar when using an Exchange server. The 
only time that it exhibits the weird behavior is when interacting with an 
IMAP server.

Outlook has many other problems also. Think about this one. If you only have 
an IMAP email account, you would probably want to show the inbox for that 
IMAP account by default. The only way to change the default folder for 
Outlook is to start editing registry keys. Why would something like that not 
be configurable within the program?

I personally think that Outlook does what it can to make its users depend on 
Exchange since IMAP provides nearly all of the mail related benefits of using 
Exchange from the client perspective. When using Exchange, for instance, your 
mail magically pops up in the main inbox. It would be nice to be able to use 
IMAP in a mode like that. Maybe one should be able to tell Outlook that the 
IMAP is the only account and have it treated as such.

Of course, to be fair, all mail clients have their issues. For one example, 
Mail.app, the Mac OS X client, removes all messages in your inbox associated 
with a particular POP account when you delete the account. This doesn't make 
sense since the message are downloaded and more than likely erased from the 
server.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

2006-05-22 Thread Patrick Radtke


On May 22, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:


On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:



On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:


On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:

On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master  
mailboxes.db from my backend server.

skiplist - 20-25 minutes
berkeley - 3 minutes


How many mailboxes are there?


About 145000.


Is there also a speed difference when running
'time ctl_mboxlist -mw'

from your backends?


That's what I did.  :)


haha, yup:) I should have been clearer.
I want to know the diff speed, not the rebuild speed.

So how long does ctl_mboxlist -mw take to run when the mupdate master  
is in sync with the backend.


For example,

with backend and murder master in sync, ctl_mboxlist takes 16 seconds  
to run here.
If I'm rebuilding the murder master db from scratch then it takes 2+  
hours.


We have 782443 mailboxes, divided up across a bunch of backends.

I would like the speed of berkley, but I don't trust it to be stable.

-Patrick


Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Outlook does not delete but displays deleted messages asstrike-trough

2006-05-22 Thread Warren Turkal
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:29, Joseph Brennan wrote:
 Both clients I use show deleted messages with a line through them, and
 neither one is Outlook.  Why would you call this ridiculous?  It's easy
 to undelete by highlighting one and clicking undelete.  And it reminds
 me they're still taking up space, which nudges me to expunge them every
 so often.  I like controlling when my messages get wiped out.

Clearly, there are two schools of thought here, and I totally see why this 
makes sense. I also know that this mode of operation is unacceptable to my 
users, and I have to set up the Outlook users with POP so that it acts like 
they expect with the trash folder.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

2006-05-22 Thread Andrew Morgan

On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:


haha, yup:) I should have been clearer.
I want to know the diff speed, not the rebuild speed.

So how long does ctl_mboxlist -mw take to run when the mupdate master is in 
sync with the backend.


For example,

with backend and murder master in sync, ctl_mboxlist takes 16 seconds to run 
here.

If I'm rebuilding the murder master db from scratch then it takes 2+ hours.

We have 782443 mailboxes, divided up across a bunch of backends.

I would like the speed of berkley, but I don't trust it to be stable.


For a berkeley backend on the mupdate master:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ time /usr/local/cyrus/bin/ctl_mboxlist -mw

real0m5.268s
user0m1.404s
sys 0m2.556s


For a skiplist backend:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ time /usr/local/cyrus/bin/ctl_mboxlist -mw

real0m4.575s
user0m1.384s
sys 0m2.576s


Still, since skiplist takes so long to populate initially, a failure of 
the mupdate master can have a pretty large effect on service.


Andy

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

2006-05-22 Thread Wesley Craig
I have a patch set to ctl_mboxlist that outputs mailboxes.db on the  
backend in a format that may be concatenated and reloaded on the  
mupdate master.  Using this method, we can rebuild our mupdate master  
from the collective backends in a matter of minutes, even with 800K  
mailboxes.


:wes

On 22 May 2006, at 18:28, Andrew Morgan wrote:
Still, since skiplist takes so long to populate initially, a  
failure of the mupdate master can have a pretty large effect on  
service.


Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Cyrus Patches used at FastMail.FM

2006-05-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
I've finally split out all the patches that we use here into
individual items.

I know some people were interested in the don't allow users to
set the anyone ACL patch as well.

http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/

Ken - I'd love to work with you on getting as many as possible of these
into upstream, at least the ones that are labelled as worth doing - some
are so cheap-hack as to require a complete rewrite to make them
worthwhile.

Bron.

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html