Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-25 Thread Arnaldo Viegas de Lima
I just upgraded from 2.4.17 to 3.0..3. 

My only troubles were with default options that changed, like the hierarchy 
separator, the namespace and delayed expunge. They all forced me to update 
scripts all around. And the namespace change had a nasty side effect: users 
must delete and add their accounts again (when using some mail clients) to 
restore order to the caos. 

I could have kept the 2.4.x behavior, but I see the merit in the new defaults, 
so fixing scripts and having users refresh their account setup was worth it 
(not many users here).

Hope you have more luck with 3.0.3.




> On Aug 25, 2017, at 8:07 AM, Gabriele Bulfon  wrote:
> 
> I will.
> 
> Another note.
> 
> I tried restarting from scratch, replicated my entire 2.4.12 system, checked 
> that it worked as expected, updated packages to 3.0.2 and started cyrus as is 
> with no upgrade : the problem is there just after updating the binaries, even 
> before migrating the data to the new version.
> 
> I will absolutely try the 3.0.3, but I'm starting to feel unsafe 
> upgrading :(
> 


Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-25 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I will.
Another note.
I tried restarting from scratch, replicated my entire 2.4.12 system, checked 
that it worked as expected, updated packages to 3.0.2 and started cyrus as is 
with no upgrade : the problem is there just after updating the binaries, even 
before migrating the data to the new version.
I will absolutely try the 3.0.3, but I'm starting to feel unsafe upgrading 
:(
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Arnaldo Viegas de Lima
To:
Gabriele Bulfon
Cc:
Simon Matter
Merlin Hartley
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 25, 2017 12:36:22 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
This is 3.0.3 on Centos 7:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 
AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN SASL-IR] xx.xx.x Cyrus IMAP 
3.0.3-Cyrus 3.0.3 server ready
. login x x
. OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxten QUOTA 
MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN 
MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SEARCH=FUZZY SORT SORT=MODSEQ 
SORT=DISPLAY SORT=UID THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS 
ANNOTATEMORE ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 METADATA LIST-EXTENDED LIST-STATUS 
LIST-MYRIGHTS LIST-METADATA WITHIN QRESYNC SCAN XLIST XMOVE MOVE SPECIAL-USE 
CREATE-SPECIAL-USE DIGEST=SHA1 X-REPLICATION URLAUTH URLAUTH=BINARY 
XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE LOGINDISABLED AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=PLAIN 
AUTH=LOGIN COMPRESS=DEFLATE X-QUOTA=STORAGE X-QUOTA=MESSAGE 
X-QUOTA=X-ANNOTATION-STORAGE X-QUOTA=X-NUM-FOLDERS IDLE] User logged in 
SESSIONID=
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 10 calls)
Maybe you should consider giving 3.0.3 a try?
Arnaldo.

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-25 Thread Arnaldo Viegas de Lima
This is 3.0.3 on Centos 7:

* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 
AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN SASL-IR] xx.xx.x Cyrus IMAP 
3.0.3-Cyrus 3.0.3 server ready
. login x x
. OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxten QUOTA 
MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN 
MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SEARCH=FUZZY SORT SORT=MODSEQ 
SORT=DISPLAY SORT=UID THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS 
ANNOTATEMORE ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 METADATA LIST-EXTENDED LIST-STATUS 
LIST-MYRIGHTS LIST-METADATA WITHIN QRESYNC SCAN XLIST XMOVE MOVE SPECIAL-USE 
CREATE-SPECIAL-USE DIGEST=SHA1 X-REPLICATION URLAUTH URLAUTH=BINARY 
XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE LOGINDISABLED AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 AUTH=CRAM-MD5 AUTH=PLAIN 
AUTH=LOGIN COMPRESS=DEFLATE X-QUOTA=STORAGE X-QUOTA=MESSAGE 
X-QUOTA=X-ANNOTATION-STORAGE X-QUOTA=X-NUM-FOLDERS IDLE] User logged in 
SESSIONID=
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 10 calls)

Maybe you should consider giving 3.0.3 a try?

Arnaldo.
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-25 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Can anyone check these commands against their 3.0.2 and see if they get the 
same results?
I've seen Thunderbird does not bother about it and correctly shows "Other 
Users" as "phantom", then shows the underlying tree.
If what I found is the intended result, the only way for me is to find some 
java trick to avoid the first "check" command in javamail and go through the 
list.
Anyway, that was not the behavior on 2.4.12 : first "check" command was always 
returning as the second "check".
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
To:
Simon Matter
Cc:
Merlin Hartley
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 24, 2017 5:32:32 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
:) I noticed I pasted them by mistake, it's a test user on a test server, but I 
changed its password anyway, already ;)
Thanks!
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
--
From: Simon Matter
To: Gabriele Bulfon
Cc: Merlin Hartley
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date: August 24, 2017 5:26:24 PM CEST
Subject: Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
I looked deeper into the problem.
Looks like the command:
. LIST "" "Other Users"
responds abnormally, until I run :
. LIST "" "Other Users/%"
that actually list the shared folders.
Here's a trace of the imap protocol:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN SASL-IR]
www Cyrus IMAP 3.0.2 server ready
. login gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com Nrdstg88!
I hope the login credentials are only for your test here?
Simon
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/List Archives/Info: 
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/To 
Unsubscribe:https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-24 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
:) I noticed I pasted them by mistake, it's a test user on a test server, but I 
changed its password anyway, already ;)
Thanks!
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
--
From: Simon Matter
To: Gabriele Bulfon
Cc: Merlin Hartley
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date: August 24, 2017 5:26:24 PM CEST
Subject: Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
I looked deeper into the problem.
Looks like the command:
. LIST "" "Other Users"
responds abnormally, until I run :
. LIST "" "Other Users/%"
that actually list the shared folders.
Here's a trace of the imap protocol:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN SASL-IR]
www Cyrus IMAP 3.0.2 server ready
. login gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com Nrdstg88!
I hope the login credentials are only for your test here?
Simon

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-24 Thread Simon Matter
> I looked deeper into the problem.
> Looks like the command:
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> responds abnormally, until I run :
> . LIST "" "Other Users/%"
> that actually list the shared folders.
> Here's a trace of the imap protocol:
> * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN SASL-IR]
> www Cyrus IMAP 3.0.2 server ready
> . login gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com Nrdstg88!

I hope the login credentials are only for your test here?

Simon


Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus


Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-24 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I looked deeper into the problem.
Looks like the command:
. LIST "" "Other Users"
responds abnormally, until I run :
. LIST "" "Other Users/%"
that actually list the shared folders.
Here's a trace of the imap protocol:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN SASL-IR] www 
Cyrus IMAP 3.0.2 server ready
. login gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com Nrdstg88!
. OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ ID ENABLE ACL RIGHTS=kxten QUOTA 
MAILBOX-REFERRALS NAMESPACE UIDPLUS NO_ATOMIC_RENAME UNSELECT CHILDREN 
MULTIAPPEND BINARY CATENATE CONDSTORE ESEARCH SEARCH=FUZZY SORT SORT=MODSEQ 
SORT=DISPLAY SORT=UID THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS 
ANNOTATEMORE ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 METADATA LIST-EXTENDED LIST-STATUS 
LIST-MYRIGHTS LIST-METADATA WITHIN QRESYNC SCAN XLIST XMOVE MOVE SPECIAL-USE 
CREATE-SPECIAL-USE DIGEST=SHA1 X-REPLICATION URLAUTH URLAUTH=BINARY 
LOGINDISABLED XCONVERSATIONS COMPRESS=DEFLATE X-QUOTA=STORAGE X-QUOTA=MESSAGE 
X-QUOTA=X-ANNOTATION-STORAGE X-QUOTA=X-NUM-FOLDERS IDLE] User logged in 
SESSIONID=
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.010 secs)
. LIST "" "Other Users/%"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/amministrazione"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/dev-team"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/newsletter"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/pec"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/pectest"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/sonicle"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/spamadm"
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Other Users/supporto"
. OK Completed (0.030 secs 162 calls)
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.020 secs 162 calls)
As you can see the first check on presence of "Other Users" returns nothing.
While the last one, after listing subfolders, returns the correct answer.
JavaMail internally runs the check before looking for subfolders when trying to 
list a folder, and this fails only on "Other Users" because of the problem 
above.
Any idea what's happening?
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
To:
Merlin Hartley
Cc:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 5:34:11 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
In the reconstruct log, I have all the:
Repacked user/blabla/dra...@sonicle.com to version 13
for all the mailbox trees.
Obviously "Other Users" is not in reconstruct, as it is a virtual folder coming 
out of the incoming sharings.
ACLs looks same with cyradm for shared folders:
localhostlam user/soni...@sonicle.com
gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
soni...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
localhostlam user/soni...@sonicle.com
gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
soni...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Merlin Hartley
To:
Gabriele Bulfon
Cc:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 5:16:22 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Just a quickie: Are you sure these mailboxes migrated properly?
M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
On 23 Aug 2017, at 15:55, Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
wrote:
I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for 
subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the 
"checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
To:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject:
2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" &

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-23 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
In the reconstruct log, I have all the:
Repacked user/blabla/dra...@sonicle.com to version 13
for all the mailbox trees.
Obviously "Other Users" is not in reconstruct, as it is a virtual folder coming 
out of the incoming sharings.
ACLs looks same with cyradm for shared folders:
localhostlam user/soni...@sonicle.com
gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
soni...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
localhostlam user/soni...@sonicle.com
gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
soni...@sonicle.com lrswipkxtecda
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Merlin Hartley
To:
Gabriele Bulfon
Cc:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 5:16:22 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Just a quickie: Are you sure these mailboxes migrated properly?
M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
On 23 Aug 2017, at 15:55, Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
wrote:
I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for 
subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the 
"checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
To:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject:
2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
==3.0.2==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs)
So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder 
in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and 
configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
Thanx!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
Cyrus Home Page:
http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info:
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page:
http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info:
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-23 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
How do I know? I just moved to 3.0.2 and reconstructed.
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Merlin Hartley
To:
Gabriele Bulfon
Cc:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 5:16:22 PM CEST
Subject:
Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Just a quickie: Are you sure these mailboxes migrated properly?
M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
On 23 Aug 2017, at 15:55, Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
wrote:
I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for 
subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the 
"checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
gbul...@sonicle.com
To:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject:
2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
==3.0.2==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs)
So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder 
in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and 
configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
Thanx!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
Cyrus Home Page:
http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info:
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page:
http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info:
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-23 Thread Merlin Hartley
Just a quickie: Are you sure these mailboxes migrated properly?

M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom

> On 23 Aug 2017, at 15:55, Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com> wrote:
> 
> I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
> 
> . LIST "" %
> 
> including the "Other Users" :
> 
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
> ...
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
> 
> but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see 
> for subfolders.
> Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the 
> "checkExistance" using :
> 
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> 
> and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
> 
> Also trying by hand :
> 
> . LIST "Other Users" *
> 
> returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Gabriele
> 
> 
> Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com <http://www.sonicle.com/>
> Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon 
> <http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon>
> 
> 
> From: Gabriele Bulfon <gbul...@sonicle.com>
> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Date: August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
> Subject: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
> behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
> Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
> 
> ==2.4.12==
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
> . OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
> 
> ==3.0.2==
> . LIST "" "Other Users"
> . OK Completed (0.000 secs)
> 
> So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a 
> folder in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
> Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and 
> configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
> 
> Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
> 
> Thanx!
> Gabriele
> 
> Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com <http://www.sonicle.com/>
> Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
> Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon 
> <http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon>
> 
> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
> List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
> To Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
> 
> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
> List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
> To Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus


Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Re: 2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-23 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I would add that both systems returns the same list of folders with :
. LIST "" %
including the "Other Users" :
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
* LIST (\HasChildren) "/" Archive
...
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
but then the java code just tries a "folder.list()" on each of them, to see for 
subfolders.
Here the javamail code, before issuing the list command, tries the 
"checkExistance" using :
. LIST "" "Other Users"
and 3.0.2 returns an empty result.
Also trying by hand :
. LIST "Other Users" *
returns all the subtree on 2.4.12, while it's empty on 3.0.2.
Any idea?
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
From:
Gabriele Bulfon
To:
info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date:
August 23, 2017 4:41:36 PM CEST
Subject:
2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
==3.0.2==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs)
So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder 
in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and 
configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
Thanx!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/List Archives/Info: 
http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/To 
Unsubscribe:https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

2.4.12 vs 3.0.2 different protocol behaviour

2017-08-23 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hi,
I found a problem while scanning the imap tree through our java web app, 
behaving differently from a 2.4.12 to a 3.0.2 upgraded.
Looking at the protocol I find these differences:
==2.4.12==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs 192 calls)
==3.0.2==
. LIST "" "Other Users"
. OK Completed (0.000 secs)
So, what happens is that while the java code is checking existence of a folder 
in the tree, on 3.0.2 it receives an error.
Systems are same, replicated, but one upgraded to 3.0.2, so imap base and 
configuration is the same, but for the 3.0.2 trimmings.
Is there any setting for compatibility in this case?
Thanx!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus