Re: Wrong date for delayed articles?
Hi, Peter Münster writes: >> The mail get me properly in the delayed date, but the "Date" field in >> the message itself is the date when I wrote the message, not when it >> was sent. I don't see an option in the manual to change this >> behaviour, is it possible? > > You could try this: (setq message-draft-headers '(References From)) great, thanks, thar worked perfectly. I think that this should be the default, rather than keeping the date when the mail was started? Thanks, -- Ángel de Vicente http://angel-de-vicente.blogspot.com/ ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: Wrong date for delayed articles?
On Thu, Oct 11 2012, Angel de Vicente wrote: > The mail get me properly in the delayed date, but the "Date" field in > the message itself is the date when I wrote the message, not when it > was sent. I don't see an option in the manual to change this > behaviour, is it possible? You could try this: (setq message-draft-headers '(References From)) -- Peter ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Wrong date for delayed articles?
Hi, I was trying the "Delayed Articles" feature (section 3.6 of the manual). The mail get me properly in the delayed date, but the "Date" field in the message itself is the date when I wrote the message, not when it was sent. I don't see an option in the manual to change this behaviour, is it possible? Thanks, -- Ángel de Vicente http://angel-de-vicente.blogspot.com/ ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
