Re: October status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? > dbruno > > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? > Not yet, but I'll do in the next few hours. > > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > I would like to contribute in the sysadmin tasks, with Ansible playbooks and with python tasks. > > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14 I'm looking at the moment, but I did not choose any yet. > > > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > Yes, I want to be a member :) > > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? > > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? > > Yes, I'm able to attend the weekly meeting and I find the weekly helpful to follow the discussions and to get some answers. > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby Yes, I've logged in several times. > > > 9. If you could have the power to become invisible OR the power to read > minds, which would you choose? > Became invisible for sure it's would be a way to ensure some private moments anywhere, on other hand read minds would violate others' privacy. > > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- Daniel Bruno (dbruno) http://dbruno.org Fedora Ambassadors Mentor @ LATAM ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] Bring back the "chair" alias, just one place to list FPL
Applied, thanks. kevin pgpogVEQtm7Wc.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
[PATCH] Bring back the "chair" alias, just one place to list FPL
--- roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template b/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template index 7b647f1..33dcd29 100644 --- a/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template +++ b/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ board: advisory-bo...@lists.fedoraproject.org chairman: chair directors: board +# This is the one place to change FPL identity, re: +# https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Project_Leader +chair: mattdm # FESCo fesco-chair: kevin @@ -137,9 +140,9 @@ fudcon-cfp: /dev/null fudcon-paper:fudcon-cfp # flock -flockpress: rsuehle,spot,mattdm -flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,mattdm -flock-staff: rsuehle,spot,mattdm,jwboyer +flockpress: rsuehle,spot,fpl +flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,fpl +flock-staff: rsuehle,spot,fpl,jwboyer # gnome backups gnomebackup: back...@gnome.org -- 2.4.3 ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Bug 1268192] New: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. Disconnecting: Packet corrupt"
On 2 October 2015 at 01:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > this is an issue in Copr: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268192 > this happen rarely, but this is not first report. So I should address it > somehow. > > Google say: > > http://serverfault.com/questions/338439/ssh-sessions-terminate-abruptly-with-message-corrupted-mac-on-input-disconnect > > https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/25306/slow-network-speed-between-vm-and-external/ > > I hesitate to turn off checksumming, but switching TCP segmentation offload > off gains some improvements. > During several measurements I see gain from 15.2 sec to 14.6 sec (when > transferring Fedora ISO). > But I was unable to reproduce the packet corruption. > > The question is - should I disable TCO on Copr machines only, or should I > disable it in general VM spinup playbook for > all our VM? I would turn it off on Copr machiens only. If other systems see problems it can be hard to realize "oh that is happening on all boxes" late in the game. If we know we have isolated it to one set of systems it is better to do so. > And this wiki: > https://www.rdoproject.org/Using_GRE_tenant_networks#Offloading > suggest to turn it off for physical hosts too. Not sure why. That is if we are using GRE in the networks. Are we? If we are it does make sense because the GRE in the kernel relies on dealing with an 'uncorrupted' packet which offloading does. > I welcome your comments > > Mirek > > > > > > Přeposlaná zpráva > Předmět: [Bug 1268192] New: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. > Disconnecting: Packet corrupt" > Datum: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:27:49 + > Od: bugzi...@redhat.com > Komu: msu...@redhat.com > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268192 > > Bug ID: 1268192 >Summary: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. > Disconnecting: Packet corrupt" >Product: Copr > Component: backend > Assignee: msu...@redhat.com > Reporter: redhatbugzi...@kyl191.net > > > > Description of problem: > copr builds are building successfully, but the final rsync fails with an error > message. > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > > > How reproducible: > Random, occurred twice on Fedora Rawhide, once on EPEL 7, but I only did 5 > builds. > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Start a copr build, possibly only on EPEL7/Fedora Rawhide > 2. Wait > 3. Build might be marked as failed despite rpm packages being in the fold > afterwards. > > Actual results: > Some copr builds fail inexplicably in the middle of an rsync job. > > Expected results: > Rsync is successful > > Additional info: > Affected builds: > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00122195-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122195.rsync.log > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/epel-7-x86_64/00122218-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122218.rsync.log > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/fedora-rawhide-i386/00122219-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122219.rsync.log > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
[release] pkgdb2: 1.29
Good morning everyone, I just cut a new pkgdb2 release: 1.29 Here is its changelog: * Fri Oct 02 2015 Pierre-Yves Chibon - 1.29-1 - Update to 1.29 - Adjust the README's intructions (trishnaguha) - Fixed the problem with formatting the description of a package (farhaanbukhsh) - Adjust docstring now that pkgdb in Fedora's infra is using dynamic endpoints (Mikolaj Izdebski) - Pull info from bugzilla to pre-populate the new package form when requesting new packages to be added This is currently running in stg and will be running in prod shortly. Thank you for your attention, Pierre pgp9K9Uj9Foki.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: October status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
My answers inline. Em qui, 1 de out de 2015 às 18:03, Kevin Fenzi escreveu: > Greetings. > > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? > > lnxslck > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look > at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? > Not last month, but i plan to, yes. > > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > > Yes. > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14 > > Haven't found one suitable for me yet. > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > > Of course. > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would > help you do any of the above? > Sometimes entering the machines can be pretty hard. > > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > > Login in into machines. > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find > them helpful or interesting? > > Yes, and yes they're very helpfull (open floor specially). > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to > our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby > > Not yet. > 9. If you could have the power to become invisible OR the power to > read minds, which would you choose? > > Most people speak their mind, say what they really think when they're alone, so being invisible would probably allow me to ear what some people think about me, and i would still have the invisibility power, so yeah, i would choose invisible. > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin > ___ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fwd: [Bug 1268192] New: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. Disconnecting: Packet corrupt"
Hi, this is an issue in Copr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268192 this happen rarely, but this is not first report. So I should address it somehow. Google say: http://serverfault.com/questions/338439/ssh-sessions-terminate-abruptly-with-message-corrupted-mac-on-input-disconnect https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/25306/slow-network-speed-between-vm-and-external/ I hesitate to turn off checksumming, but switching TCP segmentation offload off gains some improvements. During several measurements I see gain from 15.2 sec to 14.6 sec (when transferring Fedora ISO). But I was unable to reproduce the packet corruption. The question is - should I disable TCO on Copr machines only, or should I disable it in general VM spinup playbook for all our VM? And this wiki: https://www.rdoproject.org/Using_GRE_tenant_networks#Offloading suggest to turn it off for physical hosts too. Not sure why. I welcome your comments Mirek Přeposlaná zpráva Předmět: [Bug 1268192] New: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. Disconnecting: Packet corrupt" Datum: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:27:49 + Od: bugzi...@redhat.com Komu: msu...@redhat.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268192 Bug ID: 1268192 Summary: Rsync fails with "Corrupted MAC on input. Disconnecting: Packet corrupt" Product: Copr Component: backend Assignee: msu...@redhat.com Reporter: redhatbugzi...@kyl191.net Description of problem: copr builds are building successfully, but the final rsync fails with an error message. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Random, occurred twice on Fedora Rawhide, once on EPEL 7, but I only did 5 builds. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start a copr build, possibly only on EPEL7/Fedora Rawhide 2. Wait 3. Build might be marked as failed despite rpm packages being in the fold afterwards. Actual results: Some copr builds fail inexplicably in the middle of an rsync job. Expected results: Rsync is successful Additional info: Affected builds: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00122195-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122195.rsync.log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/epel-7-x86_64/00122218-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122218.rsync.log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kyl191/nginx-pagespeed/fedora-rawhide-i386/00122219-nginx-pagespeed/build-00122219.rsync.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
