Namespacing in pkgdb

2015-12-15 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hello everyone,

The Fedora infrastructure and the release-engineering teams have worked together
to begin to add namespacing to our infrastructure. The idea is that in a near
future Fedora will distribute more than just rpms, such as docker containers but
also other technologies that might arise [1].

For this, we have been working on a new version of pkgdb2 and a few adjustments
to dist-git allowing to have a docker and a rpm with the same name but under
different namespace.

On Thursday December 17th, we would like to roll out this new release of pkgdb2.

Currently, all your tools: fedpkg, pkgdb-cli, pkgdb-admin should work as they do
today, all changes being backward compatible, but as for everything, there
might be bugs. So we would appreciate if you could let us know as early as
possible
if you think you ran into one, either
- here
- on #fedora-admin on irc.freenode.net
- via a ticket on https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/

If you want to see how the new pkgdb2 looks like, feel free to test our staging
instance:
https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/


Thank you for your help and understanding,

Happy packaging,
Pierre for the Fedora Infrastructure team

[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QIHGWL5ZHZXEJJ6YLVSEHKF7W5DPKI24/#VKDVATVI3XJUKIS3EKNGC3HKG4UVA4M4


pgpT5fTDnNKM6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: December status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

2015-12-15 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
Sorry for late reply, but I was on vacation.

On 12/03/2015 09:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> 0. Whats your fedora account system login?

mizdebsk

> 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at
> our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to?

Yes, I have.

> 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute
> to more?

No.

> 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice
> 'easyfix' tickets?
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14

No, I didn't have time to do that.

> 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever
> reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road?

Yes, I do.

> 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help
> you do any of the above?

No.

> 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved?
> Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you?
> Finding tickets in your interest area? 

Getting access to relevant systems (and finding time :)

> 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them
> helpful or interesting? 

Yes, and yes.

> 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our
> meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby

Not in the past month - I didn't have anything to add to agenda.

> 9. Did you know that we are going to be doing a 'technical debt
> cleanup' week on 2016-01-06 to 2016-01-09? See:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Debt
> and come join us.

Yes, I do - It was discussed on Flock in Rochester.

-- 
Mikolaj Izdebski
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org