Re: Docker Component in Bugzilla

[Adam Miller]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Matthew Miller
 wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product.
>> > ie, at this level:
>> > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product?
>> I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to
>> chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting
>> the color of the bike shed.
>
> I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but
> accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a
> clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the
> fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace
> just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images".
>
> What do you all think?

+1

-AdamM

>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> 
> Fedora Project Leader
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Docker Component in Bugzilla

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product.
> > ie, at this level:
> > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product?
> I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to
> chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting
> the color of the bike shed.

I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but
accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a
clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the
fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace
just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images".

What do you all think?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Docker Component in Bugzilla

[Adam Miller]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:12:38 -0500
> Adam Miller  wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> Now that we have approved FESCo Docker Image Guidlines[0] and
>> we're really close to having the Docker Layered Image Build System in
>> place (everything works, just a couple items to get in Ansible and
>> more testing before going to PROD), it's time to cross off final items
>> for bringing Docker Layered Images to Fedora. One of the these items
>> is to create a Bugzilla Component for Docker items much in the same
>> way that we have components for RPMs. I'm sure there will be something
>> needed for pkgdb but I don't know what specifically. I know that pkgdb
>> does already have support for the docker namespace (as does fedpkg) so
>> I'm hoping that the amount of work needed isn't too bad.
>>
>> I'm unsure of exactly what all needs to be done and I hope that I
>> haven't confused the issue because I might not be up on the Bugzilla
>> vocabulary. I'm mostly looking for advisement on what the next steps
>> should be, what all needs to be done and where I can help in making
>> those things happen.
>
> Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product.
> ie, at this level:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?classification=Fedora
>
> and then pkgdb will need to create components under that for each
> docker image along with who should be point of contact and who cc'ed,
> etc.
>
> Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product?

I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to
chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting
the color of the bike shed.

-AdamM

>
> kevin
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Mailman3 known issues

[Aurelien Bompard]

Hey team,

Next week I'll be going offline for 3 weeks (two of them being really off
the grid, I'm going to the European equivalent of the Burning Man
festival...), so I'd like to check with you what errors I've seen our
production Mailman3 instance do these last weeks.

I think that the main issue I haven't fixed yet is the fact that sometimes,
for an unknown reason (yet), the archiving process dies, and email isn't
archived anymore. The posts are still relayed to the subscribers, but the
email are not archived. This can be detected by two ways:

* there is no running process called "/usr/bin/python3.4
/usr/libexec/mailman3/runner --runner=archive:0:1 -C /etc/mailman.cfg" (see
the "runner" option on the command line)

* the "/var/spool/mailman3/archive/" directory starts filling up with
files. It's usually empty.

The best way to fix this is currently to restart the mailman process with
"systemctl restart mailman3". Then the unarchived emails in the backlog
will be processed, the speed is variable but it's around 1 or 2 per second.

The other problems that I've been pinged about recently are really
specific, it's either configuration problems or bugs that I've fixed now.
When it's about emails being rejected, it's usually a good idea to start
looking at the list's header filters (in Postorius).

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. I'm leaving for the desert
on June 30th, I'll start being mildly reacheable on July 13th, and will be
back on Monday 18th.

Thanks!

Aurélien
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

[release] MirrorManager2: 0.7.3

[Adrian Reber]

A new release of MirrorManager2 is available: 0.7.3

* Thu Jun 23 2016 Adrian Reber  - 0.7.3-1
- Update to 0.7.3
- Allow submission of checkin information via json (Patrick Uiterwijk)
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/170
- Add logging to checkin code (Patrick Uiterwijk)
- mm2_crawler: Add missing field to stats dict
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/176
- mirrolist: fix =1
  https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/178

This is currently running in stg for those who want to test it.
We will update the production systems later.

Adrian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org