Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Fedora project login
On 1/2/19 10:59 AM, James Cassell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 1/2/19 12:44 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Extremely BAD experience trying to log in at >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-9a4a06731c >> >> Sorry to hear it. ;( >> >>> First I couldn't remember my username but I could remember my password >>> and the VERY BROKEN DESIGN does not allow me to request it send me a >>> reminder of my username. >>> >>> Finally figured out my username and it sent me a password reset. >>> >>> Reset password, and it would not let me log in. >>> >>> Attempted several times. >>> >>> Figuring I entered it wrong and did the reset again. >>> >>> Tried the password the way it was in my password manager and it said I >>> couldn't reset it to an old password. >>> >>> So regenerated new password - but with that also could not log in. >> >> Can you expand on that? What did it do? You got a username/password >> dialog? It said password incorrect? or any other messages/errors? >> > > Here's my experience: > Go to https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org > Click "Login" > Dialog pops up asking for user/pass > Click Cancel > Page comes up for FAS log in > Put Fedora Account System credentials > Click "Log In" > Get redirected back to bodhi, logged in. > > Typing my FAS credentials into the first pop up dialog just shows the dialog > again and does not log me in. This sounds like a bug we have seen in the past where fas sends a 503 or something and ipsilon only stores partial info in cookies in your browser and then thinks it has all the info on retries. Can you: * Try clearing any *.fedoraproject.org cookies in your browser and/or * Try logging in in a 'private' window, does that work? kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] Add CDN testing cloudfront redirect for atomic repo
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:16 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > I've applied the patch and deployed it in production. > Thanks a lot Mikolaj! On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:55 PM Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:16 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/3/19 10:40 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Currently, we are using two different cloudfront distributions to CDN > content for > >> > /atomic/repo/objects/ and /atomic/repo/deltas/ . With the current > setup we see > >> > an issue https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1541 . To > overcome this > >> > issue and provide faster delivery of ostree content, we have created a > >> > cloudfront distribution where we CDN /atomic/repo/ . > >> > > >> > This patch (available in attachment) adds some redirect rules to use > new > >> > cloudfront urls for testing purpose and see how much improvement we > get in > >> > content delivery. This patch shouldn't impact existing infra setup. > >> > > >> > >> I'd like to highlight this is for testing purposes only and should have > a short > >> life. We just wanted to make sure the "redirect penalty" that we > experience with > >> our prod redirects is also reflected in our testing so we can get more > accurate > >> results. > >> > >> Sinny, > >> > >> One thing we might want to do is use https for the cloudfron URLs like > we are for > >> the prod redirects. Otherwise LGTM. > > > > > > Ah yes, nice catch. Updated patch is available in the attachment. > > This is the sad part part of doing copy paste :/ > > > > > >> > >> Dusty > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > http://sinny.io/ > > ___ > > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- http://sinny.io/ ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] Add CDN testing cloudfront redirect for atomic repo
I've applied the patch and deployed it in production. On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:55 PM Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:16 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1/3/19 10:40 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Currently, we are using two different cloudfront distributions to CDN >> > content for >> > /atomic/repo/objects/ and /atomic/repo/deltas/ . With the current setup we >> > see >> > an issue https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1541 . To overcome this >> > issue and provide faster delivery of ostree content, we have created a >> > cloudfront distribution where we CDN /atomic/repo/ . >> > >> > This patch (available in attachment) adds some redirect rules to use new >> > cloudfront urls for testing purpose and see how much improvement we get in >> > content delivery. This patch shouldn't impact existing infra setup. >> > >> >> I'd like to highlight this is for testing purposes only and should have a >> short >> life. We just wanted to make sure the "redirect penalty" that we experience >> with >> our prod redirects is also reflected in our testing so we can get more >> accurate >> results. >> >> Sinny, >> >> One thing we might want to do is use https for the cloudfron URLs like we >> are for >> the prod redirects. Otherwise LGTM. > > > Ah yes, nice catch. Updated patch is available in the attachment. > This is the sad part part of doing copy paste :/ > > >> >> Dusty >> >> > > > -- > http://sinny.io/ > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
