Re: CPE Weekly: 2019-10-18

[Aoife Moloney]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 7:13 PM Tomasz Torcz  wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:54:05PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> >
> >-
> >
> >Bodhi 5.0 beta has been deployed in staging this week
> >-
> >
> >   Looksto be on track for ’dev-complete’
> >   -
> >
> >Koji Project
> >-
> >
> >   Db-koji01 performance problems: Gathering query logs and asking for
> >   help from koji developers
> >   https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8292
> >   -
> >
> >   Overview page of the remaining blockers and dependencies organized
> at:
> >   -
> >
> >  https://hackmd.io/Gbuu9JOPR--Y2yNCBEYI5A?view
> >  -
> >
> > Input welcome for anything that would be missing
> > -
> >
> >  https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/3
> >  -
> >
> > High priority items in the “Ready” column are all
> > hard-dependency for pushing multi-builds to production
> > -
>
>
> > If you have any comments or any feedback on this information blast, send
> > them my way :)
>
>
>   Thanks for the report.  One question: what's with the strange
> formatting?  Multi-lvel indentation and dashes in empty lines?
>
>
Hey Tomasz!

Not sure, probably just a copy and paste error, but I'll recheck the format
before sending it next week - thanks for the feedback :)

Also my apologies for a closed link contained in the update - I send these
updates to both internal and external mailing list and that one was for
internal audiences only.

It was an internal update on CentOS Streams and contained information that
has been openly discussed on the lists already, so if you follow them, you
are already in the know :)

Apologies for the erroneous linking, and any weird formatting from todays
update email - will triple check them before sending next week!


Have a great weekend,
Aoife

>
> --
> Tomasz   .. oo o.   oo o. .o   .o o. o. oo o.   ..
> Torcz.. .o .o   .o .o oo   oo .o .. .. oo   oo
> o.o.o.   .o .. o.   o. o. o.   o. o. oo .. ..   o.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 

Aoife Moloney

Feature Driver

Community Platform Engineering Team

Red Hat EMEA 

Communications House

Cork Road

Waterford

___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: CPE Weekly: 2019-10-18

[Tomasz Torcz]

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:54:05PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> 
> 
>-
> 
>Bodhi 5.0 beta has been deployed in staging this week
>-
> 
>   Looksto be on track for ’dev-complete’
>   -
> 
>Koji Project
>-
> 
>   Db-koji01 performance problems: Gathering query logs and asking for
>   help from koji developers
>   https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8292
>   -
> 
>   Overview page of the remaining blockers and dependencies organized at:
>   -
> 
>  https://hackmd.io/Gbuu9JOPR--Y2yNCBEYI5A?view
>  -
> 
> Input welcome for anything that would be missing
> -
> 
>  https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/3
>  -
> 
> High priority items in the “Ready” column are all
> hard-dependency for pushing multi-builds to production
> -
 
 
> If you have any comments or any feedback on this information blast, send
> them my way :)


  Thanks for the report.  One question: what's with the strange
formatting?  Multi-lvel indentation and dashes in empty lines?


-- 
Tomasz   .. oo o.   oo o. .o   .o o. o. oo o.   ..
Torcz.. .o .o   .o .o oo   oo .o .. .. oo   oo
o.o.o.   .o .. o.   o. o. o.   o. o. oo .. ..   o.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [FBR 1/1] Enable new mirrorlist server on proxy14

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 11:10, Randy Barlow  wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 09:13 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > Thanks for that recommendation. Can you point me to a place in
> > ansible
> > where you are using this? For this FBR I would rather not change it
> > and
> > go with the current solution. The goal is to completely remove the
> > conditionals because it either works (everything uses the new
> > approach)
> > or it does not work at all (keep on using the current approach). If
> > we
> > would actually go the way to slowly switch more proxies one after
> > another I would change the conditionals to how you described it. For
> > now
> > I would rather try it the way I currently have it.
>
> Hey Adrian!
>
> I am not sure that I have used the technique I describe in this Ansible
> project, but I have been using it in some other Ansible projects I work
> on. Unfortunately, none are public at the moment.
>
> Sure, I'm not opposed to the patch as-is, just a suggestion for
> improvement.

Let us go with the patch as is. Then let us put in for a Fedora
Hackday where we re-engineer some playbooks to do this new method?


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

CPE Weekly: 2019-10-18

[Aoife Moloney]

Hi everyone,


Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail!



*Background:** The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team
combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to
keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
other strategic tasks that need more dedicated time than volunteers can
give.*

*For better communication, we will be giving weekly reports to the CentOS
and Fedora communities about the general tasks and work being done.  *




Fedora:


Rawhide Gating:  



   -

   Bodhi 5.0 beta has been deployed in staging this week
   -

  Looksto be on track for ’dev-complete’
  -

   Koji Project
   -

  Db-koji01 performance problems: Gathering query logs and asking for
  help from koji developers
  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8292
  -

  Overview page of the remaining blockers and dependencies organized at:
  -

 https://hackmd.io/Gbuu9JOPR--Y2yNCBEYI5A?view
 -

Input welcome for anything that would be missing
-

 https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/3
 -

High priority items in the “Ready” column are all
hard-dependency for pushing multi-builds to production
-

   Robosignatory is now running fedora-messaging in Rawhide Gating



repoSpanner 



   -

   One of our team members engaged in a two week performance sprint with
   interesting discoveries!
   -

  Email to fedora-infra with more detail on the sprint is >>here<<
  






CentOS:



   -

   CentOS Streams
   -

  All Hands on Thursday 17th Oct - Recording:
  https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/usxwptgv
  -

   CentOS CI
   -

  JMS messaging plugin is working now
  -

 PR to jms upstream created
 https://github.com/jenkinsci/jms-messaging-plugin/pull/147
 -

 Waiting for review from upstream maintainer
 -

  Wrangling DNS for openshift cluster upgrades
  -

   CentOS Mirror
   -

  Switched https://mirror-status.centos.org to centos 7 node (ansible
  managed), and now fully working for CentOS Stream




Application Handover to Community



   -

   Elections: Blocked by this issue!
   -

   PostgreSQL database is missing in application catalogue
  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8253
  -

   Badges: Thread is still ongoing!
   -

   Pastebin: Updated to point to CentOS and updated in F30 & F31
   -

   Fedocal: Maintainer found!
   -

   Main admin has been given to new maintainer & there is now a Taiga
  board https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/fedora-calendar/kanban
  -

   Nuancier: Maintainer(s!) are identified and the team are engaging in a
   conversation :)
   -

  There is also a conversation happening
  

  in Fedora infra channel about changes in Nuancier.
  -

   Documentation for onboarding contributors to Community OpenShift still
   ongoing with a good mail thread on Fedora Devel





Misc highlights from various parts of the ecosystem:



   -

   EPEL:  Centos7.7 aarch64 was retired from EPEL

Ansible being pushed for EPEL 8 out with cleaned up spec

   -

   Robosignatory - Added CoreOS Signing ticket
   https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7884






If you have any comments or any feedback on this information blast, send
them my way :)


Have a lovely weekend!

Aoife
-- 

Aoife Moloney

Feature Driver

Community Platform Engineering Team

Red Hat EMEA 

Communications House

Cork Road

Waterford

___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [FBR 1/1] Enable new mirrorlist server on proxy14

[Randy Barlow]

On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 09:13 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Thanks for that recommendation. Can you point me to a place in
> ansible
> where you are using this? For this FBR I would rather not change it
> and
> go with the current solution. The goal is to completely remove the
> conditionals because it either works (everything uses the new
> approach)
> or it does not work at all (keep on using the current approach). If
> we
> would actually go the way to slowly switch more proxies one after
> another I would change the conditionals to how you described it. For
> now
> I would rather try it the way I currently have it.

Hey Adrian!

I am not sure that I have used the technique I describe in this Ansible
project, but I have been using it in some other Ansible projects I work
on. Unfortunately, none are public at the moment.

Sure, I'm not opposed to the patch as-is, just a suggestion for
improvement.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [FBR 1/1] Enable new mirrorlist server on proxy14

[Adrian Reber]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:37:17PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 10:50 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > {% if env == "staging" or inventory_hostname ==
> > "proxy14.fedoraproject.org" %}
> 
> Rather than inlining host names like this, why not use host vars to
> define a boolean variable like "enable_cool_new_rust_mirrorlist". Then
> you can make that true in staging, true on proxy 14, and false
> everywhere else and make this if statement simpler and more "permanent"
> (i.e., you don't to touch this or the other two places with similar
> adjustments later when you want to add the other proxies.
> 
> I'm guilty of doing the above in my Ansible too, but recently I've been
> thinking that it would be better to use the host and group vars
> instead. And honestly this is pretty similar to what a lot of our
> playbook does, so I am not opposed.
> 
> Anyways, I'm +1 to the change as-is, but would prefer a change that
> uses vars over this one, if you are so inclined.

Thanks for that recommendation. Can you point me to a place in ansible
where you are using this? For this FBR I would rather not change it and
go with the current solution. The goal is to completely remove the
conditionals because it either works (everything uses the new approach)
or it does not work at all (keep on using the current approach). If we
would actually go the way to slowly switch more proxies one after
another I would change the conditionals to how you described it. For now
I would rather try it the way I currently have it.

Adrian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org