Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB
This has been done. On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 16:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each > > guest in ansible and via virsh commands. > > +1. we have tons of free memory there, should use it. > > kevin > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each > guest in ansible and via virsh commands. +1. we have tons of free memory there, should use it. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:52 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each guest > in ansible and via virsh commands. > +1 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 15:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each > guest in ansible and via virsh commands. > > -- > Stephen J Smoogen. > > diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/koji b/inventory/group_vars/koji index 91d7c1b3b..ec3d910b0 100644 --- a/inventory/group_vars/koji +++ b/inventory/group_vars/koji @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- # Define resources for this group of hosts here. lvm_size: 3 -mem_size: 16384 +mem_size: 32768 num_cpus: 16 -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB
Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each guest in ansible and via virsh commands. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What is our technical debt?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 09:27:24PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > Just like every team we have technical debt in our work. > I would like your help to try to define what it is for us. Good Morning Everyone, I've been quite late at sending this email and you have my apologies for that. Basically, following on our discussions I've looked at all the applications we maintain or/and run and built a matrix of our technical debt. A brief overview: - 56 apps are listed in the matrix - 42 apps support python3 (or not concerned by python) - 39 apps support fedora-messaging - 26 apps have fedora-messaging schemas - 18 apps are clear documentation identified - 31 apps have clear unit-tests identified - 20 apps are clearly using pytest for their tests (the other could be either unknown or using the deprecated nosetests) - 45 apps have support for OIDC (does not mean they are all currently using it though!) - 43 apps have a clear primary point of contact - 16 apps have a clear secondary point of contact So as you can see, there is not a single criteria by which we are ok for all our apps. It is also worth noting that we lack a primary point of contact for 6 of our applications that are considered "critical path" (ie: required to build Fedora and ship it to our users). The overall matrix is available at: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/fedora_tech_debt_matrix/Applications.html We have also identified a few infrastructure technical debts that we have recorded in a second sheet: https://pingou.fedorapeople.org/fedora_tech_debt_matrix/Infrastructure.html Some of these have already been submitted as initiative briefs so likely won't but still need to be addressed at some point. As you can see, we do not lack items in our backlog... Pierre ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Latest Transtats 0.8.0 deployed in Production
Hi, Latest release of Transtats[1] 0.8.0 is deployed in production[2]. #changes - UI improvements - landing page (for logged-in users) - territory details page and coverage details page - Latest package built details right in package details page (*latest built stats*) - default build tag for package branch mapping - Package stats source_branch cleanup form, and bug fixes. - Weblate translation platform support. Hope this helps improve users' experiences. thanks, sundeep [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Transtats [2] https://transtats.fedoraproject.org/releases ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
