Re: PACKAGE SOURCES site: Can't add a user as admin.

[Jun Aruga (he / him)]

Hi,
Thanks for your help! Now I was able to add the user to the
rpms/rtslib after the user logins again!

Jun

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 6:59 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I tried to add a user [1] to the rpms/htslib [2] project as "admin" on
> > the PACKAGE SOURCES (src.fedoraproject.org). But clicking the "Add"
> > button on the "Add user" page, I got the error message below, even
> > when the user has the role "member" of the "packager"[1].
> >
> > "This user must be in one of the following groups to be allowed to be
> > added to this project: packager".
> >
> > Do you know how to add the user?
>
> The user needs to logout and back on to src.fedoraproject.org.
>
> Group memberships are refreshed on login. So until they login again it
> will not know they have been added to a new group.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic
See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for
the timezone.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

PACKAGE SOURCES site: Can't add a user as admin.

[Jun Aruga (he / him)]

Hi,
I tried to add a user [1] to the rpms/htslib [2] project as "admin" on
the PACKAGE SOURCES (src.fedoraproject.org). But clicking the "Add"
button on the "Add user" page, I got the error message below, even
when the user has the role "member" of the "packager"[1].

"This user must be in one of the following groups to be allowed to be
added to this project: packager".

Do you know how to add the user?
Thanks.

[1] https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/ron/
[2] rpms/htslib - Settings - Users & Groups - "Add user" -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/htslib/adduser

-- 
Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic
See  for
the timezone.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: moving bugzilla overrides to dist-git

[Jun Aruga]

>  We are thinking on providing a simple text field to submit FAS username or 
> email to override the default assignee, the big question is then, who should 
> be allowed to update this field ?

I like it's the same policy with editing the Setting page of
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/foo .

> Should the main admin be able to set someone else as assignee ?

Yes.

> If there is already an override assignee, who should be allowed to change 
> that ?

Main admin (maintainer) + other admin people can be allowed.

> If there's no override assignee set, can everyone become it or is that up to 
> the main admin of the component to decide and set ?

First, someone can take a main admin (maintainer) for
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/foo . Then the person can set.

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

[Jun Aruga]

> There's also a video about it from Flock 2019:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phCHilTEQb4=PL0x39xti0_64C75dRUuwlXlfYRgjgdEP4=8=0s

Thanks. But why is the video mode "Unlisted" not public?

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

[Jun Aruga]

> > Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Communishift" in plain 
> > English?
>
> Communishift is the OpenShift cluster that Infra runs for
> community-run applications[1]. Its name is a portmanteau of
> "Community" and "OpenShift".
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Communishift

Thanks for the explanation. I understand it.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments

[Jun Aruga]

HI Ben,

> Where does Communishift fit in here? I didn't see it mentioned.

Could you explain about the meaning of the word "Communishift" in plain English?
As I am not a native English speaker, I do not understand the actual
meaning. Maybe does it mean a kind of behavior?

-- 
Jun | He - His - Him
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: modules/ruby - private-jaruga-master branch wrongly released on f30.

[Jun Aruga]

Hi Mikolaj,

Thanks for your help!
I reported it to do untag it.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8279

> > Also can you remove "private-jaruga-master" and f26, f28, f29 branch
> > from below repository?
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby/branches
> > I am a main admin of the modules/ruby repository,  but I do not have
> > the permission to do it.
>
> Sorry, but no. We don't remove dist-git branches by policy. Especially
> branches from which builds done.

Sure. It's sad thing.
Creating the branch was easy for the modules/ruby in very early time,
but removing it is impossible.



-- 
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno,
Czech Republic
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

modules/ruby - private-jaruga-master branch wrongly released on f30.

[Jun Aruga]

Hello Infra team,

ruby:private-jaruga-master is included in Fedora repos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698958

Can you help to remove my name's private-jaruga-master branch from
Fedora repositories?

Also can you remove "private-jaruga-master" and f26, f28, f29 branch
from below repository?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby/branches
I am a main admin of the modules/ruby repository,  but I do not have
the permission to do it.

Thanks.

-- 
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno,
Czech Republic
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Server space for Fedora users?

[Jun Aruga]

> * Hopfully soon we will be (finally) reinstall our private cloud
instance and one of the goals out of that rebuild is to provide Fedora

This is awesome. This is ideal situation.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources

Before requesting the resource, I try my experiment on my local PC.

Jun



On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4 November 2017 at 13:22, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> > On 11/03/2017 03:26 AM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> >>> Possibly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources
> >>>
> >>> Could your database run in Fedora's OpenShift instance?
> >>
> >> OK, awesome.
> >> Yes, I can run the database in it. Maybe.
> >
>
> Wouldn't a mongo database work better in Open Stack versus Open Shift?
> People keep confusing the two when saying they want something..
>
> Our Open Stack is out current cloud. Our current openshift as Kevin
> says is only meant for production usage.
>
> > Well, we currently have 2 openshift's... one for our staging
> > applications and one for production ones. I didn't intend either for
> > general purpose apps/development/experiments. That said:
> >
> > * Hopfully soon we will be (finally) reinstall our private cloud
> > instance and one of the goals out of that rebuild is to provide Fedora
> > contributors space on it for whatever Fedora related things they want to
> > work on.
> >
> > * Also perhaps soon, there's some hardware for a development openshift
> > that the atmoic siq and osas and infra are working on. That I would also
> > think would be a great place to work on something like this.
> >
> > In the mean time, if you are ready to go now and just need a place for
> > it, perhaps we could give you an instance on our existing cloud? Note
> > that there will be some downtime when we migrate it later, but it should
> > work well enough for now... If so, just file a ticket and say what
> > OS/memory/disk you need.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > kevin
> > --
> >
> >>
> >> Jun
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Miller <
> mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> >>>> I want to build Mongo DB server somewhere in Fedora servers as my
> >>>> experiment for effective Fedora packaging.
> >>>> Because I want to research a correlation between the build error and
> how
> >>> to
> >>>> be fixed by machine learning approach to automate RPM packaging.
> >>>> I do not want to pay my money for my private AWS server for that. :)
> >>>> Is it possible to a server space?
> >>>
> >>> Possibly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources
> >>>
> >>> Could your database run in Fedora's OpenShift instance?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthew Miller
> >>> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> >>> Fedora Project Leader
> >>> ___
> >>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
> >>> fedoraproject.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
Republic
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Server space for Fedora users?

[Jun Aruga]

> Possibly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources
>
> Could your database run in Fedora's OpenShift instance?

OK, awesome.
Yes, I can run the database in it. Maybe.

Jun




On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > I want to build Mongo DB server somewhere in Fedora servers as my
> > experiment for effective Fedora packaging.
> > Because I want to research a correlation between the build error and how
> to
> > be fixed by machine learning approach to automate RPM packaging.
> > I do not want to pay my money for my private AWS server for that. :)
> > Is it possible to a server space?
>
> Possibly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources
>
> Could your database run in Fedora's OpenShift instance?
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
>



-- 
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
Republic
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Server space for Fedora users?

[Jun Aruga]

I want to build Mongo DB server somewhere in Fedora servers as my
experiment for effective Fedora packaging.

Because I want to research a correlation between the build error and how to
be fixed by machine learning approach to automate RPM packaging.
I do not want to pay my money for my private AWS server for that. :)

Is it possible to a server space?

For example,

A RPM package's repository has
  Time line: Commit A => Commit B

- Commit hash A that has a build error.
- Commit hash B that the error is fixed on.

The record may be like this.

Input data:
  - Fedora package name
  - The RPM spec file content at commit hash A.
  - root.log and build.log at the commit hash A.
Output data:
  - Commit hash B: How to be fixed for commit hash A's error.

Jun
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedpkg import: Could not execute import_srpm

[Jun Aruga]

Hi Tomasz,

> Try
> 
>   dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade fedpkg
> 
> And, if it works fine for you, please provide positive karma at
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a383ccbf57

Thanks! It works fine for me! I provided positive karma!

Jun Aruga


- Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Torcz" <to...@pipebreaker.pl>
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:18:27 PM
> Subject: Re: fedpkg import: Could not execute import_srpm
> 
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:31:42PM -0500, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Thanks for the information!
> > 
> > 
> > $ sudo dnf upgrade fedpkg --refresh
> > 
> > $ rpm -qa fedpkg
> > fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24.noarch
> > 
> > Then I have checked several "updates" repos too.
> > 
> > So, maybe I need to wait to use 1.26?
> 
> Try
> 
>   dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade fedpkg
> 
> And, if it works fine for you, please provide positive karma at
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a383ccbf57
> 
> --
> Tomasz TorczOnly gods can safely risk perfection,
> xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man.  -- Alia
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fedpkg import: Could not execute import_srpm

[Jun Aruga]

Thanks for the information!


$ sudo dnf upgrade fedpkg --refresh

$ rpm -qa fedpkg
fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24.noarch


Then I have checked several "updates" repos too.

https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f24=x86_64
  For example. 
http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/fedora/linux/updates/24/x86_64/f/
  Still fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24.noarch.rpm is latest version in these servers.

So, maybe I need to wait to use 1.26?

Jun Aruga

- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi" <ke...@scrye.com>
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:12:04 PM
> Subject: Re: fedpkg import: Could not execute import_srpm
> 
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:37:29 -0500 (EST)
> Jun Aruga <jar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I got an error with fedpkg import.
> > Anyone do you know why? Is it related on Kerberos?
> > 
> > 
> > $ kinit jar...@fedoraproject.org
> > 
> > $ fedpkg scratch-build --srpm
> > 
> >   => Scratch build was succeed.
> > 
> > $ rpm -qa fedpkg
> > fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24.noarch
> 
> 
> You want 1.26:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=824828
> 
> kevin
> 
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedpkg import: Could not execute import_srpm

[Jun Aruga]

Hello,

I got an error with fedpkg import.
Anyone do you know why? Is it related on Kerberos?


$ kinit jar...@fedoraproject.org

$ fedpkg scratch-build --srpm

  => Scratch build was succeed.

$ rpm -qa fedpkg
fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24.noarch

$ fedpkg import rubygem-spring-2.0.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Could not execute import_srpm: 

302 Found

Found
The document has moved https://src.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi;>here.



Thank you.

--
Jun Aruga jar...@redhat.com
IRC: jaruga, Office: FBC1, Brno, Czech Republic


___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to use fresh module on mock build

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

I got it.
Thanks.

Jun Aruga

> 
> Well, it takes a while for things to mirror out.
> 
> The rawhide compose finished this morning at about 10:00 UTC
> 
> You did a mockbuild against whatever local mirrors at about 12:00 UTC
> 
> You sent this email at ~13:30 UTC
> 
> It depends on the mirror when they sync and how long it takes, but its
> usually more than a few hours. So, you will need to wait a while more,
> or setup a local mirror, or point your mock configs to a mirror that
> updates faster than whatever ones mirrormanager gives you by default.
> 
> kevin
> 
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How to use fresh module on mock build

[Jun Aruga]

Hi, Mikolaj

Thank you. I could do it.
The reason why I posted here is, that I supposed it was related on infra side. 
synchronizing for rawhide repo is delaying.

Best regards,
Jun Aruga

- Original Message -
> From: "Mikolaj Izdebski" <mizde...@redhat.com>
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:08:20 PM
> Subject: Re: How to use fresh module on mock build
> 
> First, wrong list - this question should go to devel@
> 
> On 07/26/2016 12:04 PM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Today I tried to build rubygem-uglifier package depending on
> > rubygem-execjs.
> > 
> > On scratch build (Koji), new version is used.
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1471/15021471/root.log
> > rubygem-execjs.noarch 2.7.0-1.fc25
> > 
> > However on mock build, old version still is used.
> 
> Try mock --enablerepo local ...
> 
> --
> Mikolaj Izdebski
> Software Engineer, Red Hat
> IRC: mizdebsk
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to use fresh module on mock build

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

Yesterday I pushed rubygem-execjs-2.7.0-1.fc25 to master branch (RAWHIDE).
I updated from rubygem-execjs-0:2.2.0-3.fc24 (old) to 
rubygem-execjs-2.7.0-1.fc25 (new).

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/rubygem-execjs
2016-07-25 13:54:31
rubygem-execjs-2.7.0-1.fc25


Today I tried to build rubygem-uglifier package depending on rubygem-execjs.

On scratch build (Koji), new version is used.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1471/15021471/root.log
rubygem-execjs.noarch 2.7.0-1.fc25

However on mock build, old version still is used.

I could see the old version on "rewhide" repo/
$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide rubygem-execjs
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the ne 2.7 MB/s |  49 MB 
00:18
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:24 ago on Tue Jul 26 11:51:27 2016.
rubygem-execjs-0:2.2.0-3.fc24.noarch

What's happening?
How long do I need to wait to use fresh module?
How to use fresh module on mock build?

Thanks.

Jun Aruga
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora', disabling.

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

Thanks for your message and your fixing it.
Now I could do mock building for fedora-rawhide with success.
I wish that the issue referred on below github URL is going to be fixed. 

Thanks.

Jun


- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi" <ke...@scrye.com>
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 5:14:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora', disabling.
> 
> On Thu, 26 May 2016 06:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
> Jun Aruga <jar...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I got an error in mock building in my environment for fedora-rawhide
> > from today. Yesterday I could do mock building. My colleague also got
> > same error for another package's mock building today.
> > 
> > Is anyone working in the system now?
> 
> This seems to be a mirrormanager bug.
> 
> ( https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/96 )
> 
> Basically it's supposed to each time rawhide updates add the new
> repomd.xml in and keep the previous 2 around for slow updating mirrors.
> However, we haven't had any rawhide composes that worked in the last 3
> days, so it rolled off the last known good repomd.xml leaving
> nothing. ;(
> 
> We have manually fixed it up for now... and will keep an eye on it.
> 
> Sorry for the trouble.
> 
> kevin
> 
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora', disabling.

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,

I got an error in mock building in my environment for fedora-rawhide from 
today. Yesterday I could do mock building.
My colleague also got same error for another package's mock building today.

Is anyone working in the system now?

Thanks.

Below is for detail.

$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 rubygem-bundler_ext-0.4.0-3.fc25.src.rpm
Run? [y/n]: y
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.17 starting (python version = 3.4.3)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
INFO: Start(rubygem-bundler_ext-0.4.0-3.fc25.src.rpm)  
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64)
Start: clean chroot
Finish: clean chroot
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled dnf cache
Start: cleaning dnf metadata
Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
Mock Version: 1.2.17
INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.17
Start: dnf install
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora', disabling.
Warning: Group 'buildsys-build' does not exist.
Error: Nothing to do.
ERROR: Exception(rubygem-bundler_ext-0.4.0-3.fc25.src.rpm) 
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 0 minutes 51 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result
ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ 
--releasever 25 --disableplugin=local --setopt=deltarpm=false install 
@buildsys-build --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo 
[fedora]
name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
failovermethod=priority
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever=$basearch
enabled=1
metadata_expire=28d
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch
skip_if_unavailable=False
...
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can not download repomd.xml for rawhide-source repo.

[Jun Aruga]

> This should be fixed now. I went in and manually fixed it to use the
> right directory.

Thanks, Kevin.
I could check that it worked well for "metalink" setting!


$ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo

[rawhide-source]
...
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=$basearch
...

$ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires 
'rubygem(acts_as_list)'
RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Free - Test Updates   2.1 MB/s | 332 kB 
00:00
Fedora - Rawhide - Source8.7 MB/s | 6.3 MB 
00:00
Adobe Systems Incorporated   4.2 kB/s | 1.8 kB 
00:00
Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates 7.1 MB/s |  21 MB 
00:02
RPM Fusion for Fedora 23 - Nonfree - Test Updates625 kB/s | 104 kB 
00:00
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu Apr  7 11:06:58 2016.



Best,
Jun


- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi" 
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 8:45:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Can not download repomd.xml for rawhide-source repo.
> 
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:23:41 +0200
> Adrian Reber  wrote:
> 
> > Looking at the metalink it only lists a few mirrors which have an
> > empty source directory at the wrong location:
> > 
> >   development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/repodata
> > 
> > I am not 100% sure were data have been moved but I think it is now at:
> > 
> >   development/rawhide/Everything/source/tree/repodata
> > 
> > Somebody did some database changes for other parts of that move and
> > probably the rawhide-source repository still points at the old/wrong
> > location in MirrorManager.
> 
> This should be fixed now. I went in and manually fixed it to use the
> right directory.
> 
> kevin
> 
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can not download repomd.xml for rawhide-source repo.

[Jun Aruga]

Hi, Kevin

Thanks for the replying.
Now I could understand the situation, clearly!
Let me comment as follows.

> > Case [1][2]: got an error for "dnf repoquery". but [3] it works.
> > Does Fedora infra team need to modify server settings to fix this
> > error?
> > 
> > 
> > - Case [1]
> > $ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
> > ...
> > [rawhide-source]
> > baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/
> > ...
> > 
> > $ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires
> > 'rubygem(acts_as_list)' Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo
> > 'rawhide-source' from
> > 'http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/':
> > Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All
> > mirrors were tried
> > 
> > When I clicked
> > http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS
> > by my Firefox, its URL was redirected to
> > http://mirrors.nic.cz/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/
> > and the URL was not found (404). (cz domain is because I was in Czech
> > Republic).
> 
> 
> Right. download.fedoraproject.org is a redirect that redirects you to a
> mirror. Sometimes (especially after things like Alpha release, or
> rawhide not composing for the last 4 days and working today) it takes
> a while for mirrors to catch up, so you may be redirected to a mirror
> thats not up to date.
> 
> Note that this is not the default setting. You set it yourself.

Okay, I understood it. I take note that sometimes "Not found (404)" can be 
happened.
Yes, I changed the default setting by myself.


> > - Case [2]
> > $ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
> > ...
> > [rawhide-source]
> > metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=$basearch
> > ...
> > 
> > $ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires
> > 'rubygem(acts_as_list)' Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo
> > 'rawhide-source' from
> > 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=x86_64':
> > Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All
> > mirrors were tried
> > 
> > I clicked
> > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=x86_64,
> > and downloaded "metalink" text file by my Firefox. Though several
> > link sites were "not found 404" for the repomd.xml. I could find one
> > available link site, that is the link of [3].
> 
> So, like I mentioned above... rawhide hasnt been composing until late
> yesterday. So, possibly all mirrors got marked out of date... I see
> some synced now. Is this working for you now?

Unfortunately, for this case [2], it is still not working now.

$ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires 
'rubygem(acts_as_list)'
Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Updates 56 
MB/s |  20 MB 00:00
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rawhide-source' from 
'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=x86_64': 
Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors 
were tried


> > - Case [3]
> > $ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
> > ...
> > [rawhide-source]
> > baseurl=http://ftp.uninett.no/linux/fedora/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/
> > ...
> > 
> > $ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires
> > 'rubygem(acts_as_list)' Fedora - Rawhide -
> > Source   3.6 MB/s | 6.1
> > MB 00:01 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Tue Mar
> > 29 12:10:32 2016 => OK
> 
> ok.
> 
> So, in short, I think this is caused by the failure of rawhide to
> compose for more days than mirrormanager keeps to consider mirrors up
> to date and should now be cleared up.

I got it. Thanks.


Best,
Jun





> 
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Can not download repomd.xml for rawhide-source repo.

[Jun Aruga]

Hi, Fedora Infra team

Can I ask you a question about fedora-rawhide repo?
Case [1][2]: got an error for "dnf repoquery". but [3] it works.
Does Fedora infra team need to modify server settings to fix this error?


- Case [1]
$ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
...
[rawhide-source]
baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/
...

$ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires 
'rubygem(acts_as_list)'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rawhide-source' from 
'http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/':
 Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors 
were tried

When I clicked 
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS
 by my Firefox, 
its URL was redirected to 
http://mirrors.nic.cz/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/ and the 
URL was not found (404). (cz domain is because I was in Czech Republic).


- Case [2]
$ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
...
[rawhide-source]
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=$basearch
...

$ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires 
'rubygem(acts_as_list)'
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rawhide-source' from 
'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=x86_64': 
Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors 
were tried

I clicked 
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide-source=x86_64, and 
downloaded "metalink" text file by my Firefox.
Though several link sites were "not found 404" for the repomd.xml. I could find 
one available link site, that is the link of [3].


- Case [3]
$ sudo vi /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
...
[rawhide-source]
baseurl=http://ftp.uninett.no/linux/fedora/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/
...

$ dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch src --whatrequires 
'rubygem(acts_as_list)'
Fedora - Rawhide - Source   3.6 
MB/s | 6.1 MB 00:01
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Tue Mar 29 12:10:32 2016
  => OK

Best regards,
Jun Aruga
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org