Re: Freeze Break request: update kernel on buildhw-x86*

[Justin Forbes]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:52 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> Hey everyone.
>
> The koji builders are currently using 6.7.6-200.fc39, which is mostly
> fine, but on i386 builds there's some kind of memory issue and (some)
> builds run out of memory and fail. ;(
>
> See: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11775
>
> I'd like to upgrade the buildhw-x86* builders to the latest 6.8.x
> kernel. We tried this in staging and it let the build complete fine.
> We only need to do those builders because those are the only ones in the
> 'heavybuilder' channel that webkitgtk builds use, and the x86 ones are
> the only ones that do i386 builds. ;)
>
> We could I suppose update all the buildvm-x86* also in case there are
> other packages we don't know about that are affected, but then the
> change is wider.
>
> So, +1s? Thoughts?

It's a +1 from me, but understand I will be out of pocket starting
later this week for quite some time. While I have coverage lined up
for most Fedora bits, 32bit will likely be low priority for them.

Justin

> kevin
> --
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [RFC] Optionally using git repositories instead of the lookaside cache

[Justin Forbes]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:41 AM Tomas Tomecek  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline  wrote:
> >
> > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell)
> > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles
> > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it
> > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the
> > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea.
>
> When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in
> your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it
> shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now.
>
> I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going
> to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your
> future plans for the git forge?
>
> The benefits would be that you'd get all the features of packit which
> we have right now and those we implement in future.
>

While the scripts have changed a bit, I don't see any actual benefit
to packit with what we are doing. The script to create a release
builds the dist-git.  This was more about managing the lookaside so
that we weren't uploading quite as much with the daily kernel builds
in rawhide.

Justin
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org