FBR add getfedora.org redirects

2023-04-14 Thread darknao

Hello folks!

I would like to submit a Freeze Break Request to add redirects[1] from 
getfedora.org to the new website[2] on fedoraproject.org.

This will need to be applied during F38 launch on Tuesday.

Can I get some +1s?

[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1372
[2]: https://fedoraproject.org/

Thanks!

-darknao
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: FBR: add phsmoura to ability to ack/nack in nagios

2022-10-24 Thread Mark O'Brien
+1 from me

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:09 PM Stephen Smoogen  wrote:

>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1232
>
> --
> Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
> Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
> -- Ian MacClaren
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


FBR: add phsmoura to ability to ack/nack in nagios

2022-10-20 Thread Stephen Smoogen
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1232

-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: FBR: DNS update

2022-09-12 Thread Mark O'Brien
+1 from me. Thanks smooge

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:10 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:27:16AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
> > take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
> > was in this state:
> > ```
> > disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy04.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
> > enable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> > disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> > ```
> >
> > My change to the cmds files is to add proxy06.fedoraproject.org and
> proxy09
> > to the disable list and remove all others from getfedora.org. Then
> execute
> > a change and cleanup.
>
> It's too bad we can't just disable them for ipv6, but leave them in for
> ipv4. ;(
>
> Oh well, Hopefully it will be fixed soo. +1
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: FBR: DNS update

2022-09-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 11:27:16AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
> take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
> was in this state:
> ```
> disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy04.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
> enable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> ```
> 
> My change to the cmds files is to add proxy06.fedoraproject.org and proxy09
> to the disable list and remove all others from getfedora.org. Then execute
> a change and cleanup.

It's too bad we can't just disable them for ipv6, but leave them in for
ipv4. ;( 

Oh well, Hopefully it will be fixed soo. +1

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


FBR: DNS update

2022-09-08 Thread Stephen Smoogen
Currently the ipv6for osuosl.org is not functioning and I would like to
take them out of DNS. When looking at it, I found that the getfedora.org
was in this state:
```
disable proxy09.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy11.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy02.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy04.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy06.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy13.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy03.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
enable proxy12.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
disable proxy101.iad2.fedoraproject.org
```

My change to the cmds files is to add proxy06.fedoraproject.org and proxy09
to the disable list and remove all others from getfedora.org. Then execute
a change and cleanup.

-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: FBR: Add nb to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS

2022-04-28 Thread Mark O'Brien
+1

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:28 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:11 PM Nick Bebout  wrote:
> >
> > I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure.
> I'd like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.
> >
> > PR here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1048
> >
>
> +1 here
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Add nb to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS

2022-04-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 5:11 PM Nick Bebout  wrote:
>
> I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure.  I'd 
> like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.
>
> PR here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1048
>

+1 here

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: Add nb to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS

2022-04-27 Thread Nick Bebout
I was working on a ticket mattdm filed about some spammers in Pagure.  I'd
like to add myself to PAGURE_ADMIN_USERS and run the Pagure playbook.

PR here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1048

nb
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: update openshift ssl certs

2022-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:53:54PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The certs for our openshift 3 clusters in both stg and prod are out of
> date. I have created new ones and I have a PR here to update the name in
> ansible:
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1045#
> 
> I will need to run the proxies playbook to deploy these as well.
> 
> I have also updated the ocp stg certs which are due to expire next week.
> 
> +1/-1's welcome

+1 please.

We should also make sure all of these are in nagios or otherwise let us
know before they expire. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: update openshift ssl certs

2022-04-27 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

The certs for our openshift 3 clusters in both stg and prod are out of
date. I have created new ones and I have a PR here to update the name in
ansible:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1045#

I will need to run the proxies playbook to deploy these as well.

I have also updated the ocp stg certs which are due to expire next week.

+1/-1's welcome

Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: New IP for University of Southern Indiana mirror

2022-03-29 Thread Mark O'Brien
This had the required +1's so I merged and ran it

Mark

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 1:57 AM Nick Bebout  wrote:

> My mirror at USI will be becoming public and it's IP is changing.  I'd
> like to add the new IP and run the playbook.
>
> Can I get +1's for
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1017 please?
>
> nb
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: New IP for University of Southern Indiana mirror

2022-03-28 Thread Nick Bebout
My mirror at USI will be becoming public and it's IP is changing.  I'd like
to add the new IP and run the playbook.

Can I get +1's for https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1017
please?

nb
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: update mirror ip addresses for kernel.org

2022-03-22 Thread Mark O'Brien
Thanks all! Merged and run

On Tue 22 Mar 2022, 15:45 Pierre-Yves Chibon,  wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:34:57PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update
> their
> > IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
> >
> > This PR should take care of it
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1010
> >
> > I would also need to run the download playbook to apply the change.
> >
> > Let the +1/-1's flow please.
>
> +1 for me as well
>
>
> Pierre
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: update mirror ip addresses for kernel.org

2022-03-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:34:57PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update their
> IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
> 
> This PR should take care of it
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1010
> 
> I would also need to run the download playbook to apply the change.
> 
> Let the +1/-1's flow please.

+1 for me as well


Pierre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: update mirror ip addresses for kernel.org

2022-03-22 Thread Stephen Smoogen
+1 this is needed for release as kernel.org is a major offloader.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 10:35, Mark O'Brien  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update
> their IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598
>
> This PR should take care of it
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1010
>
> I would also need to run the download playbook to apply the change.
>
> Let the +1/-1's flow please.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: update mirror ip addresses for kernel.org

2022-03-22 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

We have had a request from the people at mirrors.kernel.org to update their
IP address: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10598

This PR should take care of it
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1010

I would also need to run the download playbook to apply the change.

Let the +1/-1's flow please.

Thanks,
Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: OCP4 storage configuration

2022-03-12 Thread Alex Senges
Hi everyone.

My name is Alejandro Senges aka Alex, I'm from Venezuela, actually living
in Montevideo Uruguay. I am studying low level c programming and have some
experience with python.

I would like to start participating in some coding tasks as an apprentice
here.

Is that possible?

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 16:16 Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 04:31:31PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
> > realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
> >
> > OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
> > software raid removed. This node was then added to OCP as a local volume
> to
> > allow OCP take control of the storage and manage it as part of its local
> > volume set.
>
> +1
>
> But we never really decided if ocp4 is frozen or not... :)
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: OCP4 storage configuration

2022-03-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 04:31:31PM +, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
> realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
> 
> OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
> software raid removed. This node was then added to OCP as a local volume to
> allow OCP take control of the storage and manage it as part of its local
> volume set.

+1 

But we never really decided if ocp4 is frozen or not... :)

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: OCP4 storage configuration

2022-03-11 Thread Stephen Smoogen
Thanks for the notification. +1 for the change (post)

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 11:32, Mark O'Brien  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
> realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.
>
> OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
> software raid removed. This node was then added to OCP as a local volume to
> allow OCP take control of the storage and manage it as part of its local
> volume set.
>
> Apologies,
> Mark
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: OCP4 storage configuration

2022-03-11 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

I am asking for forgiveness here. We did this work earlier today and only
realised afterward that a freeze break should have been requested.

OCP worker node worker06.ocp.iad2.fedoraproject.org had its installed
software raid removed. This node was then added to OCP as a local volume to
allow OCP take control of the storage and manage it as part of its local
volume set.

Apologies,
Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Update oz on certain aarch64 builders

2022-03-09 Thread Stephen Smoogen
+1 to this

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 16:27, Mohan Boddu  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
> some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running
>
> $ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64
>
> Hosts:
> buildhw-a64-01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-02.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-06.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-11.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-19.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-20.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-22.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-23.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-24.iad2.fedoraproject.org
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057600
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Update oz on certain aarch64 builders

2022-03-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:26:27PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
> some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running
> 
> $ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64
> 
> Hosts:
> buildhw-a64-01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-02.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-06.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-11.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-19.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-20.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-22.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-23.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> buildhw-a64-24.iad2.fedoraproject.org
> 
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057600

+1. It's to fix a blocker, so we have to do it or we would never
release. ;) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: Update oz on certain aarch64 builders

2022-03-04 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hello,

Due to a bug in initial-setup [0] we need to update oz to 0.18.1-2 on
some aarch64 builders. The list is obtained by running

$ koji list-hosts --enabled --arch armhfp --channel image --arch aarch64

Hosts:
buildhw-a64-01.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-02.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-06.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-11.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-19.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-20.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-22.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-23.iad2.fedoraproject.org
buildhw-a64-24.iad2.fedoraproject.org

[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057600

Thanks.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

2021-11-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:04:52PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
> 
> This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> changelog:
> - Warn users when a PR contains some characters
> - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan Early)
> - srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description (Zbigniew 
> Jędrzejewski-Szmek)
> - fas user url updated for new accounts system (Mark O Brien)
> - Change fas link from admin.fp.o to accounts.fp.o (Lenka Segura)
> - Remove message about 60 day key length (Ken Dreyer)
> - Escape $ to fix Jenkins interpolation warning (#5178) (Anatoli Babenia)
> - Fix another invalid  width/height attribute (Anatoli Babenia)
> - Fix missing space before src in 

Re: [FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

2021-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:07:26AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon  
> wrote:
> >
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> > changelog:
> > - Warn users when a PR contains some characters
> > - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan 
> > Early)
> > - srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description (Zbigniew 
> > Jędrzejewski-Szmek)
> > - fas user url updated for new accounts system (Mark O Brien)
> > - Change fas link from admin.fp.o to accounts.fp.o (Lenka Segura)
> > - Remove message about 60 day key length (Ken Dreyer)
> > - Escape $ to fix Jenkins interpolation warning (#5178) (Anatoli Babenia)
> > - Fix another invalid  width/height attribute (Anatoli Babenia)
> > - Fix missing space before src in 

Re: [FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

2021-11-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:06 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon  wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
> changelog:
> - Warn users when a PR contains some characters
> - srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan Early)
> - srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description (Zbigniew 
> Jędrzejewski-Szmek)
> - fas user url updated for new accounts system (Mark O Brien)
> - Change fas link from admin.fp.o to accounts.fp.o (Lenka Segura)
> - Remove message about 60 day key length (Ken Dreyer)
> - Escape $ to fix Jenkins interpolation warning (#5178) (Anatoli Babenia)
> - Fix another invalid  width/height attribute (Anatoli Babenia)
> - Fix missing space before src in 

[FBR] Update pagure to 5.13.3

2021-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone,

This morning, I have cut a new release of pagure: 5.13.3 with the following
changelog:
- Warn users when a PR contains some characters
- srcfpo theme: Change "Packages" link to new packages website (Brendan Early)
- srcfpo theme: left-align the lines in description (Zbigniew 
Jędrzejewski-Szmek)
- fas user url updated for new accounts system (Mark O Brien)
- Change fas link from admin.fp.o to accounts.fp.o (Lenka Segura)
- Remove message about 60 day key length (Ken Dreyer)
- Escape $ to fix Jenkins interpolation warning (#5178) (Anatoli Babenia)
- Fix another invalid  width/height attribute (Anatoli Babenia)
- Fix missing space before src in 

Re: FBR: fix download cron on download-cc-rdu

2021-10-19 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Merging and deploying.

On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 16:53, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> +1 here.
>
> kevin
> --
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:12:44PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: (Cron Daemon) 
> > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
> > Subject: Cron  /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
> > sync-up-downloads "/usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos"
> > To: 
> >
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper: line 50: /usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos:
> > No such file or directory
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen J Smoogen.
> > I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
> > sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
> > Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
> > time to shutdown -h now.
> > ___
> > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
time to shutdown -h now.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: fix download cron on download-cc-rdu

2021-10-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
+1 here. 

kevin
--
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:12:44PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
> 
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: (Cron Daemon) 
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
> Subject: Cron  /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
> sync-up-downloads "/usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos"
> To: 
> 
> 
> /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper: line 50: /usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos:
> No such file or directory
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
> sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
> Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
> time to shutdown -h now.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: fix download cron on download-cc-rdu

2021-10-18 Thread Mark O'Brien
+1 looks good to me

On Mon 18 Oct 2021, 20:15 Stephen John Smoogen,  wrote:

> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: (Cron Daemon) 
> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
> Subject: Cron  /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
> sync-up-downloads "/usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos"
> To: 
>
>
> /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper: line 50: /usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos:
> No such file or directory
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
> sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
> Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
> time to shutdown -h now.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: fix download cron on download-cc-rdu

2021-10-18 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/834

-- Forwarded message -
From: (Cron Daemon) 
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 15:00
Subject: Cron  /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper
sync-up-downloads "/usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos"
To: 


/usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper: line 50: /usr/local/bin/sync-up-centos:
No such file or directory


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
time to shutdown -h now.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: maintainer-test: create f35 instance and vpn settings

2021-10-12 Thread Mark O'Brien
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:05 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:09:09PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
> > have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.
> >
> > This will also require a playbook run on the batcave for the vpn
> > settings
> >
> > As always all input is greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > DNS:
> https://gist.github.com/markobrien1/4f283c2d4c8f9d70d7f26263185cf481
> >
> > Ansible:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/824#request_diff
>
> looks good. Do we want to do a f34 one too while we are at it? :)
>

I am hoping to get Pedro to that one after showing him this one.
Opportunity to knowledge share

>
> +1
>
>  Thanks
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: maintainer-test: create f35 instance and vpn settings

2021-10-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:09:09PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
> have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.
> 
> This will also require a playbook run on the batcave for the vpn
> settings
> 
> As always all input is greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> DNS: https://gist.github.com/markobrien1/4f283c2d4c8f9d70d7f26263185cf481
> 
> Ansible:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/824#request_diff

looks good. Do we want to do a f34 one too while we are at it? :) 

+1

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: maintainer-test: create f35 instance and vpn settings

2021-10-11 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

I would like to create a maintainer test instance in AWS. Below I
have a dns patch and an ansible PR for your consideration.

This will also require a playbook run on the batcave for the vpn
settings

As always all input is greatly appreciated.


DNS: https://gist.github.com/markobrien1/4f283c2d4c8f9d70d7f26263185cf481

Ansible:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/824#request_diff

Thanks,
Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: F35 Beta is Go

2021-09-24 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

Since F35 beta is go now, we can enable bodhi for automated pushes and
set the 35 bodhi status to post beta.

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/814

+1's please,

Thanks.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: To enable automated signing for f36-openh264 tag

2021-09-21 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

The PR [0] will enable automated signing for f36-openh264 tag which is
needed to update the openh264 repos for rawhide/f36 and also fix
issues in f35. Currently the pungi compose is failing due to missing
signed rpms, this will fix that issue.

+1's please

Thanks.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: run batcave playbook for rbac

2021-09-21 Thread Mark O'Brien
Thanks for the +1s I have run the playbook

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 3:32 PM Mikolaj Izdebski 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Mark O'Brien  wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> > playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> > sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
> > as requested in this ticket:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10231
> >
> > As always comments/+1's welcome
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> > ___
> > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: run batcave playbook for rbac

2021-09-21 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
+1

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Mark O'Brien  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
> as requested in this ticket:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10231
>
> As always comments/+1's welcome
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: run batcave playbook for rbac

2021-09-21 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
> playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
> sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
> as requested in this ticket:
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10231
> 
> As always comments/+1's welcome

+1 for me

Pierre


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: run batcave playbook for rbac

2021-09-21 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

I am requesting permissions to run the batcave
playbook to update rbac permissions to allow the
sysadmin-analysis group run the logserver playbook
as requested in this ticket:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10231

As always comments/+1's welcome

Thanks,
Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager

2021-09-15 Thread Adrian Reber
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:01:40PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Over the last weeks we prepared adding CentOS Stream to Fedora's
> MirrorManager instance and are now at a point where we would like to
> push the changes to ansible.
> 
> The current state can be seen at:
> 
> http://mirrors.stg.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream=x86_64
> 
> (https just broke over the weekend)
> 
> To enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager not only configuration file
> changes are necessary, but it also requires an update of all software
> components. This is mainly due to the fact that CentOS Stream is using
> an empty topdir. (topdir in MirrorManager are things like 'epel/' or
> 'fedora/linux' or 'fedora-secondary/').
> 
> Unfortunately all code assumed that topdir is not '' and hard-coded the
> removal of a slash all over the place.
> 
> All corresponding projects have been update to handle empty topdirs.
> 
> To apply https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/775 for
> prod I need this FBR.
> 
> There are risks doing code changes like this during a freeze. So far I
> have not seen any problems in staging, but staging is not using using
> MirrorManager as thoroughly as prod. I don't expect any major problems
> with this change.
> 
> I hope someone from the CentOS team can weigh if this is very time
> critical to get running or if we can wait until after the freeze.

This is now active and I am able to use it on my CentOS Stream 9 VM
with:

metalink=https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream=x86_64
metalink=https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-appstream-9-stream=x86_64
metalink=https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-crb-9-stream=x86_64

Let me know if something does not work as expected.

Adrian
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager

2021-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:01:40PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Over the last weeks we prepared adding CentOS Stream to Fedora's
> MirrorManager instance and are now at a point where we would like to
> push the changes to ansible.
> 
> The current state can be seen at:
> 
> http://mirrors.stg.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream=x86_64
> 
> (https just broke over the weekend)

I fixed that. Sorry about that. ;( 

> To enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager not only configuration file
> changes are necessary, but it also requires an update of all software
> components. This is mainly due to the fact that CentOS Stream is using
> an empty topdir. (topdir in MirrorManager are things like 'epel/' or
> 'fedora/linux' or 'fedora-secondary/').
> 
> Unfortunately all code assumed that topdir is not '' and hard-coded the
> removal of a slash all over the place.
> 
> All corresponding projects have been update to handle empty topdirs.
> 
> To apply https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/775 for
> prod I need this FBR.

Also this may need a bit more work on proxies.
Something like: 

diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml 
b/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml
index d771a0144..a2e0788cd 100644
--- a/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml
+++ b/playbooks/include/proxies-reverseproxy.yml
@@ -366,7 +366,6 @@
 website: mirrors.centos.org
 destname: mirrormanager-mirrorlist
 proxyurl: http://localhost:10002
-when: env == "staging"
 
   - role: httpd/reverseproxy
 website: download.fedoraproject.org
diff --git a/playbooks/include/proxies-websites.yml 
b/playbooks/include/proxies-websites.yml
index 99fef15cb..fb144733f 100644
--- a/playbooks/include/proxies-websites.yml
+++ b/playbooks/include/proxies-websites.yml
@@ -158,8 +158,7 @@
 server_aliases:
 - mirrors.stg.centos.org
 cert_name: "{{mirrors_centos_org_cert_name}}"
-SSLCertificateChainFile: mirrors.stg.centos.org.intermediate.cert
-when: env == "staging"
+SSLCertificateChainFile: 
"mirrors{{env_suffix}}.centos.org.intermediate.cert"
 
   - role: httpd/website
 site_name: src.fedoraproject.org

> 
> There are risks doing code changes like this during a freeze. So far I
> have not seen any problems in staging, but staging is not using using
> MirrorManager as thoroughly as prod. I don't expect any major problems
> with this change.
> 
> I hope someone from the CentOS team can weigh if this is very time
> critical to get running or if we can wait until after the freeze.

I think it would be safe to do at this point, but if we can hold off
until after freeze thats of course great. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: Enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager

2021-09-06 Thread Adrian Reber
Over the last weeks we prepared adding CentOS Stream to Fedora's
MirrorManager instance and are now at a point where we would like to
push the changes to ansible.

The current state can be seen at:

http://mirrors.stg.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-baseos-9-stream=x86_64

(https just broke over the weekend)

To enable CentOS Stream in MirrorManager not only configuration file
changes are necessary, but it also requires an update of all software
components. This is mainly due to the fact that CentOS Stream is using
an empty topdir. (topdir in MirrorManager are things like 'epel/' or
'fedora/linux' or 'fedora-secondary/').

Unfortunately all code assumed that topdir is not '' and hard-coded the
removal of a slash all over the place.

All corresponding projects have been update to handle empty topdirs.

To apply https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/775 for
prod I need this FBR.

There are risks doing code changes like this during a freeze. So far I
have not seen any problems in staging, but staging is not using using
MirrorManager as thoroughly as prod. I don't expect any major problems
with this change.

I hope someone from the CentOS team can weigh if this is very time
critical to get running or if we can wait until after the freeze.

Adrian
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: add fedora-messaging queues for CentOS Stream robosignatory

2021-09-02 Thread Mark O'Brien
PR has been merged and playbook run.

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:06 PM Stephen John Smoogen 
wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 14:40, kevin  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our
> robosignatory installation in CentOS Stream:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772
> > >
> > > I hope this turns out to be low impact, and Mark was also looking at
> generating certificates for this.
> > >
> > > +1s from sysadmins or releng are greatly appreciated
> >
> > +1 here.
>
> This can be merged.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
> sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
> Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
> time to shutdown -h now.
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: add fedora-messaging queues for CentOS Stream robosignatory

2021-09-01 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 14:40, kevin  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory 
> > installation in CentOS Stream:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772
> >
> > I hope this turns out to be low impact, and Mark was also looking at 
> > generating certificates for this.
> >
> > +1s from sysadmins or releng are greatly appreciated
>
> +1 here.

This can be merged.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
time to shutdown -h now.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: add fedora-messaging queues for CentOS Stream robosignatory

2021-09-01 Thread kevin
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0500, Brian Stinson wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory 
> installation in CentOS Stream:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772
> 
> I hope this turns out to be low impact, and Mark was also looking at 
> generating certificates for this. 
> 
> +1s from sysadmins or releng are greatly appreciated

+1 here. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: add fedora-messaging queues for CentOS Stream robosignatory

2021-09-01 Thread Brian Stinson
Hi Folks,

We'd like to have a separate fedora-messaging queue for our robosignatory 
installation in CentOS Stream:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/772

I hope this turns out to be low impact, and Mark was also looking at generating 
certificates for this. 

+1s from sysadmins or releng are greatly appreciated

-- Brian
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: add ipa host group for openshift hosts

2021-08-31 Thread kevin
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 03:47:43PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have a Freeze break request for review. I would like to add a host group
> for the openshift hosts in ipa so that we can give access to the
> sysadmin-openshift team.
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/768#
> 
> Any +1's from sysadmin-main/releng greatly appreciated
> 
> p.s. if this sounds familiar to you it is because this pull request was
> supposed to do that originally but I didn't realise the hostgroup didn't
> yet exist

Yeah, I +1ed it in the PR.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: add ipa host group for openshift hosts

2021-08-31 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

I have a Freeze break request for review. I would like to add a host group
for the openshift hosts in ipa so that we can give access to the
sysadmin-openshift team.

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/768#

Any +1's from sysadmin-main/releng greatly appreciated

p.s. if this sounds familiar to you it is because this pull request was
supposed to do that originally but I didn't realise the hostgroup didn't
yet exist

Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: os control access for sysadmin-openshift

2021-08-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:13:25PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> As per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10186
> 
> Could I get some reviews/+1's on this PR. It will allow for the work to
> continue
> on the deployment of the openshift 4 cluster for Fedora.
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/761

+1 here, seems reasonable.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: os control access for sysadmin-openshift

2021-08-25 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

As per https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10186

Could I get some reviews/+1's on this PR. It will allow for the work to
continue
on the deployment of the openshift 4 cluster for Fedora.

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/761

Thanks all,
Mark
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: Updating pungi on compose-x86-01.iad2.fp.o to pungi-4.2.8-1.fc33.infra.1.noarch

2021-03-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:18:21PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am updating pungi on compose-x86-01.iad2.fp.o to
> pungi-4.2.8-1.fc33.infra.1.noarch to match it with the one installed
> on compose-branched01.iad2.fp.o for running beta RC's. I am doing this
> proactively rather than waiting for the FBR approval to get the RC
> going.

Yeah, retroactive +1 we want this to match. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: Updating pungi on compose-x86-01.iad2.fp.o to pungi-4.2.8-1.fc33.infra.1.noarch

2021-03-09 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

I am updating pungi on compose-x86-01.iad2.fp.o to
pungi-4.2.8-1.fc33.infra.1.noarch to match it with the one installed
on compose-branched01.iad2.fp.o for running beta RC's. I am doing this
proactively rather than waiting for the FBR approval to get the RC
going.

Thanks,
Mohan Boddu.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: FBR: To add i3 spin pungi config to F34

2021-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i3 spin is a new deliverable for F34 and this PR [1] adds the needed
> config for generating the i3 live iso as part of nightly compose.
> 
> Please give your +1's.
> 
> [1] https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1012

+1 here, but might be good to get a ack from Adam that it doesn't break
fedfind or need any adjustments to it's names. :) 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


FBR: To add i3 spin pungi config to F34

2021-02-23 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

i3 spin is a new deliverable for F34 and this PR [1] adds the needed
config for generating the i3 live iso as part of nightly compose.

Please give your +1's.

[1] https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1012

Thanks,
Mohan Boddu.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [FBR] Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33

2020-10-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:56:11AM +0100, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
> to the Fedora 33 key?
> (Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
> with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)
 
+1 for me as well 

Pierre

> commit 3ee8dd3f9e883414c7846d115d2926f73ec9ea99 (HEAD -> master)
> Author: Patrick Uiterwijk 
> Date:   Wed Oct 28 11:26:44 2020 +0100
> 
> Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk 
> 
> diff --git a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> index 6a933bda9..70fde0d55 100644
> --- a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> +++ b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ handlers = ["console"]
>  key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-34', 'testkey') 
> }}"
>  keyid = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('45719a39',
> 'd300e724') }}"
>  type = "modular"
> -
> +
>  # ELN Mass Rebuild
> 
>  [[consumer_config.koji_instances.primary.tags]]
> @@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ handlers = ["console"]
> 
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/x86_64/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/aarch64/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/armhfp/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
> 
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/ostree/repo/"
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33

2020-10-28 Thread Peter Robinson
> Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
> to the Fedora 33 key?
> (Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
> with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)

+1 from me

> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> commit 3ee8dd3f9e883414c7846d115d2926f73ec9ea99 (HEAD -> master)
> Author: Patrick Uiterwijk 
> Date:   Wed Oct 28 11:26:44 2020 +0100
>
> Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk 
>
> diff --git a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> index 6a933bda9..70fde0d55 100644
> --- a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> +++ b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ handlers = ["console"]
>  key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-34', 'testkey') 
> }}"
>  keyid = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('45719a39',
> 'd300e724') }}"
>  type = "modular"
> -
> +
>  # ELN Mass Rebuild
>
>  [[consumer_config.koji_instances.primary.tags]]
> @@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ handlers = ["console"]
>
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/x86_64/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/aarch64/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/armhfp/iot"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
> -key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
> +key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
>
>  [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host"]
>  directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/ostree/repo/"
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


[FBR] Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33

2020-10-28 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hi,

Can I get acks for the following patch to move the stable IoT composes
to the Fedora 33 key?
(Note: there's a single "empty" line change as well, that was a line
with purely whitespace, which my IDE automatically cleans up.)

Thanks,
Patrick


commit 3ee8dd3f9e883414c7846d115d2926f73ec9ea99 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Patrick Uiterwijk 
Date:   Wed Oct 28 11:26:44 2020 +0100

Bump the IoT stable keys to fedora-33

Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk 

diff --git a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
index 6a933bda9..70fde0d55 100644
--- a/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
+++ b/roles/robosignatory/templates/robosignatory.toml.j2
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ handlers = ["console"]
 key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-34', 'testkey') }}"
 keyid = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('45719a39',
'd300e724') }}"
 type = "modular"
-
+
 # ELN Mass Rebuild

 [[consumer_config.koji_instances.primary.tags]]
@@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ handlers = ["console"]

 [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/x86_64/iot"]
 directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
-key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
+key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
 [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/aarch64/iot"]
 directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
-key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
+key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"
 [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/stable/armhfp/iot"]
 directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/iot/repo/"
-key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-32', 'testkey') }}"
+key = "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary('fedora-33', 'testkey') }}"

 [consumer_config.ostree_refs."fedora/29/x86_64/atomic-host"]
 directory = "/mnt/fedora_koji/koji/compose/ostree/repo/"
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] upgrade mediawiki-skin-fedora to 0.09 on wiki0{1,2}

2020-10-09 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 09:49:03 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:43:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > +1, but it would sure be nice to test in staging first. ;) 
> 
> Got staging to work and upgraded the theme there:
> https://stg.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki (see just above
> "History", "View Source", "View" at the top right of the page).
> 
> How does it look?

Looks good to me. Hard to miss.

Thanks very much :)

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] upgrade mediawiki-skin-fedora to 0.09 on wiki0{1,2}

2020-10-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:43:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> > 
> > I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
> > package.
> > It contains two changes:
> > - a fix to the CoC link in the footer
> > - adding the last edit date near the top of the pages
> >   (fixes https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8636 )
> > 
> > The changes can be reviewed at:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-mediawikitheme/commits/
> > 
> > The RPM has been built and is in the f32-infra-stg tag already:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53004452
> > 
> > I'd like to move that rpm to the f32-infra tag, update that package on both
> > wiki01 and wiki02 and reload apache afterward.
> > 
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> +1, but it would sure be nice to test in staging first. ;) 

Got staging to work and upgraded the theme there:
https://stg.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki (see just above
"History", "View Source", "View" at the top right of the page).

How does it look?


Pierre
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] upgrade mediawiki-skin-fedora to 0.09 on wiki0{1,2}

2020-10-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 05:05:06PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
> 
> I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
> package.
> It contains two changes:
> - a fix to the CoC link in the footer
> - adding the last edit date near the top of the pages
>   (fixes https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8636 )
> 
> The changes can be reviewed at:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-mediawikitheme/commits/
> 
> The RPM has been built and is in the f32-infra-stg tag already:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53004452
> 
> I'd like to move that rpm to the f32-infra tag, update that package on both
> wiki01 and wiki02 and reload apache afterward.
> 
> 
> Thoughts?

+1, but it would sure be nice to test in staging first. ;) 

Of course we need to get staging wiki working, but I think that would be
a good thing to do. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


[FBR] upgrade mediawiki-skin-fedora to 0.09 on wiki0{1,2}

2020-10-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone,

I have just tagged and release the version 0.09 of the mediawiki-skin-fedora
package.
It contains two changes:
- a fix to the CoC link in the footer
- adding the last edit date near the top of the pages
  (fixes https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8636 )

The changes can be reviewed at:
https://pagure.io/fedora-mediawikitheme/commits/

The RPM has been built and is in the f32-infra-stg tag already:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53004452

I'd like to move that rpm to the f32-infra tag, update that package on both
wiki01 and wiki02 and reload apache afterward.


Thoughts?

Pierre
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: put new proxies in action

2020-09-29 Thread Mark O'Brien
This has now been merged

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:13 PM Stephen John Smoogen 
wrote:

>
> +1 after review.
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:22, Mark O'Brien  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
>> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
>> checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
>> servers
>>
>> Just a note, the do-domains script would also need to be run on this. I
>> left it out so as not to clutter the patch.
>>
>>
>> Any +1's or comments are appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>> ___
>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: put new proxies in action

2020-09-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 after review.

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:22, Mark O'Brien  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
> checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
> servers
>
> Just a note, the do-domains script would also need to be run on this. I
> left it out so as not to clutter the patch.
>
>
> Any +1's or comments are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: put new proxies in action

2020-09-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:22:21PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
> Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
> checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
> servers
> 
> Just a note, the do-domains script would also need to be run on this. I
> left it out so as not to clutter the patch.
> 
> 
> Any +1's or comments are appreciated.

So the pagure.io and cloud.fedoraproject.org ones are probibly not
needed anymore, but I guess it doesn't hurt to update them for now. 

+1 here

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: put new proxies in action

2020-09-28 Thread Mark O'Brien
Hi All,

Attached is a DNS patch to put some new proxy servers in Europe, Asia
Pacific and Africa. The servers are up and running and passing all nagios
checks. This patch would start directing the regional traffic toward the
servers

Just a note, the do-domains script would also need to be run on this. I
left it out so as not to clutter the patch.


Any +1's or comments are appreciated.

Thanks,
Mark
From aab55f26915c6812c1084379ef785e7dde2def17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark O'Brien 
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:14:35 +
Subject: [PATCH] put new aws proxies in action

---
 cloud.fedoraproject.org.cfg | 47 ++
 fedoraproject.org.cfg   | 51 +
 getfedora.org.cfg   | 51 +
 pagure.io.cfg   | 51 +
 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+)

diff --git a/cloud.fedoraproject.org.cfg b/cloud.fedoraproject.org.cfg
index ae15b6005..8b9739b44 100644
--- a/cloud.fedoraproject.org.cfg
+++ b/cloud.fedoraproject.org.cfg
@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ config_opts['def_proxy_ttl'] = '60'
 #	 IN	 A	 13.125.120.8; proxy31 (APAC/AWS)
 #	 IN	 A	 18.185.136.17   ; proxy32 (EU/AWS)
 #IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy33 (AFR/AWS)
+#	 IN	 A	 13.250.126.156  ; proxy34 (SA/AWS)
+#	 IN	 A	 13.125.120.8; proxy35 (EU/AWS)
+#	 IN	 A	 18.185.136.17   ; proxy36 (EU/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy37 (APAC/AWS)
+#	 IN	 A	 13.125.120.8; proxy38 (APAC/AWS)
+#	 IN	 A	 18.185.136.17   ; proxy39 (AFR/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy40 (SA/AWS)
 ipv4_proxy = {
 '38.145.60.20':{
 'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'NA', 'EU', 'APAC', 'AFR'],
@@ -104,6 +111,26 @@ ipv4_proxy = {
 'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'AFR'],
 'names': ['proxy33',
   'proxy33.fedoraproject.org']},
+'18.130.159.183':{
+'regions': ['EU'],
+'names': ['proxy35',
+  'proxy35.fedoraproject.org']},
+'18.159.254.57':{
+'regions': ['EU'],
+'names': ['proxy36',
+  'proxy36.fedoraproject.org']},
+'13.233.183.170':{
+'regions': ['APAC'],
+'names': ['proxy37',
+  'proxy37.fedoraproject.org']},
+'13.212.21.54':{
+'regions': ['APAC'],
+'names': ['proxy38',
+  'proxy38.fedoraproject.org']},
+'13.244.109.203':{
+'regions': ['AFR'],
+'names': ['proxy39',
+  'proxy39.fedoraproject.org']},
 '10.3.163.74':{
 'regions': ['IAD2'],
 'names': ['proxy01',
@@ -180,6 +207,26 @@ ipv6_proxy = {
  'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'AFR'],
  'names': ['proxy33',
'proxy33.fedoraproject.org']},
+  '2a05:d01c:c6a:cc03:263a:8409:b961:7e02':{
+ 'regions': ['EU'],
+ 'names': ['proxy35',
+   'proxy35.fedoraproject.org']},
+  '2a05:d014:10:7803:f774:4d7c:e277:a457':{
+ 'regions': ['EU'],
+ 'names': ['proxy36',
+   'proxy36.fedoraproject.org']},
+  '2406:da1a:fcb:2f01:f381:af1a:f922:c519':{
+ 'regions': ['APAC'],
+ 'names': ['proxy37',
+   'proxy37.fedoraproject.org']},
+  '2406:da18:39f:a01:8c16:c226:1274:7098':{
+ 'regions': ['APAC'],
+ 'names': ['proxy38',
+   'proxy38.fedoraproject.org']},
+  '2406:da11:911:f403:5bba:652:9218:ecef':{
+ 'regions': ['AFR'],
+ 'names': ['proxy39',
+   'proxy39.fedoraproject.org']},
   }
 
 config_opts['ipv4_proxy'] = ipv4_proxy
diff --git a/fedoraproject.org.cfg b/fedoraproject.org.cfg
index f4dfc9904..f23f5e284 100644
--- a/fedoraproject.org.cfg
+++ b/fedoraproject.org.cfg
@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ config_opts['def_proxy_ttl'] = '60'
 #	 IN	 A	 13.125.120.8; proxy31 (APAC/AWS)
 #	 IN	 A	 18.185.136.17   ; proxy32 (EU/AWS)
 #IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy33 (AFR/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.250.126.156  ; proxy34 (SA/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.125.120.8; proxy35 (EU/AWS)
+#IN  A   18.185.136.17   ; proxy36 (EU/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy37 (APAC/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.125.120.8; proxy38 (APAC/AWS)
+#IN  A   18.185.136.17   ; proxy39 (AFR/AWS)
+#IN  A   13.244.141.152  ; proxy40 (SA/AWS)
 ipv4_proxy = {
 '38.145.60.20':{
 'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'NA', 'EU', 'APAC', 'AFR'],
@@ -104,6 +111,30 @@ ipv4_proxy = {
 'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'AFR'],
 'names': ['proxy33',
   'proxy33.fedoraproject.org']},
+'13.244.141.152':{
+'regions': ['DEFAULT', 'AFR'],
+'names': ['proxy33',
+  'proxy33.fedoraproject.org']},
+'18.130.159.183':{
+'regions': ['EU'],
+'names': ['proxy35',
+  'proxy35.fedoraproject.org']},
+'18.159.254.57':{
+'regions': ['EU'],
+'names': ['proxy36',
+  

Re: FBR

2020-09-24 Thread Mark O'Brien
+1 lgtm

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 4:45 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > > Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> > > >
> > > > I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250
> but
> > > > have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would
> like
> > > to
> > > > get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge
> also if
> > > > that is better.]
> > >
> > > Would you have a link to the commit(s) with the fix?
> > >
> > >
> > Durh
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/260
>
> Thanks!
>
> Seems to be only copr related, right?
>
> +1 for me
>
>
> Pierre
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR

2020-09-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:28:56AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> > >
> > > I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
> > > have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like
> > to
> > > get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge also if
> > > that is better.]
> >
> > Would you have a link to the commit(s) with the fix?
> >
> >
> Durh
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/260

Thanks!

Seems to be only copr related, right?

+1 for me


Pierre
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR

2020-09-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:24, Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> >
> > I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
> > have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like
> to
> > get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge also if
> > that is better.]
>
> Would you have a link to the commit(s) with the fix?
>
>
Durh

https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/260


>
> Pierre
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR

2020-09-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:11:11AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Need to fix opendkim on bastion
> 
> I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
> have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like to
> get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge also if
> that is better.]

Would you have a link to the commit(s) with the fix?


Pierre
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR

2020-09-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Need to fix opendkim on bastion

I merged a fix in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9250 but
have not run the playbook for bastion to push this out yet. I would like to
get a +1 or -1 on this before doing that. [I can remove the merge also if
that is better.]

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
This has been done.

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 16:02, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> > guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
>
> +1. we have tons of free memory there, should use it.
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> guest in ansible and via virsh commands.

+1. we have tons of free memory there, should use it. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 3:52 PM Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
>
>
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each guest 
> in ansible and via virsh commands.
>

+1



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 15:51, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:

>
> Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
> guest in ansible and via virsh commands.
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/koji b/inventory/group_vars/koji
index 91d7c1b3b..ec3d910b0 100644
--- a/inventory/group_vars/koji
+++ b/inventory/group_vars/koji
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 # Define resources for this group of hosts here.
 lvm_size: 3
-mem_size: 16384
+mem_size: 32768
 num_cpus: 16



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: increase koji ram to 32 GB

2020-09-21 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Currently koji01 and koji02 are using 16 GB and need 32 GB . Bump each
guest in ansible and via virsh commands.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DKIM signing for aws and fedorahosted

2020-09-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:03:24PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
>  *@fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@lists.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@stg.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@aws.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@lists.fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +pag...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  pag...@pagure.io bastion._domainkey.pagure.io

Looks good. +1

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DKIM signing for aws and fedorahosted

2020-09-02 Thread Mohan Boddu
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:03 PM Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
>
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable 
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
>  *@fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@lists.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@stg.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@aws.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@lists.fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +pag...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  pag...@pagure.io bastion._domainkey.pagure.io

LGTM +1

>
>  # NON-WILDCARD EXAMPLE
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DKIM signing for aws and fedorahosted

2020-09-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:03 PM Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
>
> diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable 
> b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
> --- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> +++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
>  *@fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@lists.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  *@stg.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@aws.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +*@lists.fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
> +pag...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
>  pag...@pagure.io bastion._domainkey.pagure.io
>
>  # NON-WILDCARD EXAMPLE
>

+1



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: Fix DKIM signing for aws and fedorahosted

2020-09-02 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
diff --git a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
index 84cb8f78f..81cad91f3 100644
--- a/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
+++ b/roles/opendkim/files/SigningTable
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
 *@fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
 *@lists.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
 *@stg.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
+*@aws.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
+*@fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
+*@lists.fedorahosted.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
+pag...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org bastion-iad._domainkey.fedoraproject.org
 pag...@pagure.io bastion._domainkey.pagure.io

 # NON-WILDCARD EXAMPLE


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Pre GA tasks

2020-04-27 Thread Clement Verna
+1 here from the updated diff

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 20:33, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:

>
> Reviewed updated diff. +1
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 12:41, Mohan Boddu  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> >
>> > 2 things:
>> >
>> > I do not think we want to change pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
>> > today. If we do, gnome-software will start offering f32 updates to
>> > people before release.
>> >
>> > I don't think we want to set Frozen: False yet, thats the infra freeze,
>> > it's still on until next wed.
>>
>> Thanks Kevin, here's the updated diff.
>>
>> >
>> > Otherwise looks ok to me.
>> >
>> > kevin
>> > ___
>> > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to
>> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> ___
>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: reboot ppc9-02

2020-04-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 00:33, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
> hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
> stuck hardware.
>
> I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
> like to update and reboot ppc9-02. Due to existing builds this may be
> later this weekend...
>
> +1s?
>

+1 from me


> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DNS to match closer zones

2020-04-27 Thread Clement Verna
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 17:43, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:

> Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
> out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
> this out further per continental region.
>
> diff --git a/roles/dns/files/named.conf b/roles/dns/files/named.conf
> index c8b95b9..135ec69 100644
> --- a/roles/dns/files/named.conf
> +++ b/roles/dns/files/named.conf
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ view "RDU2" {
>
>  // The zones
>  view "NA" {
> -match-clients { US; CA; MX; };
> +match-clients { US; CA; MX; BM; GL; };
>  recursion no;
>  // no rate-limit on internal requests
>  rate-limit {
> @@ -636,9 +636,10 @@ view "NA" {
>  };
>
>
> -// This is not "EU" countries, I just wanted a short way to represent
> Europe.
> +// This should have been EME and during the next freeze break should be
> made as such.
>  view "EU" {
> -match-clients { AT; BE; BG; CY; CZ; DE; DK; EE; ES; FI; FR; GR;
> HU; IT; LT; LU; LV; MT; NL; PL; PT; RO; RU; SE; UA; GB; IE; IS; NO; };
> +   match-clients { AD; AL; AT; AX; BA; BE; BG; CH; CZ; DE; DK; EE;
> ES; FI; FO; FR; GB; GG; GI; GR; HR; HU; IE; IM; IS; IT; JE; LI; LT; LU; LV;
> MC; ME; MK; MT; NL; NO; PL; PT; RO; RS; RU; SE; SI; SJ; SK; SM; UA; VA; AE;
> AM; AZ; BH; CY; GE; IL; IQ; JO; KW; LB; OM; QA; SA; TR; YE; };
> +
>  recursion no;
>  zone "fedoraproject.org" {
>  type master;
> @@ -660,7 +661,7 @@ view "EU" {
>  };
>
>  view "APAC" {
> -match-clients { AE; AF; AM; AU; AZ; BD; BH; BN; BT; CC; CN; CX;
> CY; GE; HK; ID; IL; IN; IO; IQ; IR; JO; JP; KG; KH; KP; KR; KW; KZ; LA; LB;
> LK; MM; MN; MO; MV; MY; NP; NZ; OM; PH; PK; PS; QA; RU; SA; SG; SY; TH; TJ;
> TL; TM; TR; TW; UZ; VN; YE; };
> +match-clients { AF; BD; BN; BT; CN; HK; ID; IN; JP; KG; KH; KZ;
> LA; LK; MM; MN; MO; MV; MY; NP; PH; PK; SG; TH; TJ; TL; TM; UZ; VN; AS; AU;
> CC; CK; CX; FJ; FM; GU; HM; KI; MH; MP; NC; NF; NR; NU; NZ; PF; PG; PN; PW;
> SB; TK; TO; TV; UM; VU; WF; WS; }
>  recursion no;
>  zone "fedoraproject.org" {
>  type master;
>
>
+1


>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DNS to match closer zones

2020-04-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:33:45AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are
> timing
> > out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to
> break
> > this out further per continental region.
>
> Is there somewhere you are getting these values?
>
> It seems fine enough to me, but also potentially disruptive... but I
> guess we can back it out soon if it causes problems.
>
>
So it looks like the original list was made from
https://github.com/lukes/ISO-3166-Countries-with-Regional-Codes which put
most of the Middle East in Asia. I compared it to
https://gist.github.com/richjenks/15b75f1960bc3321e295 which listed things
a little closer to major regional networks. I then grepped, sorted from the
first list Western Asia and looked to see if they were EMEA in the second
list.



> So, +1
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Fix DNS to match closer zones

2020-04-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:33:45AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
> out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
> this out further per continental region.

Is there somewhere you are getting these values? 

It seems fine enough to me, but also potentially disruptive... but I
guess we can back it out soon if it causes problems. 

So, +1

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: Fix DNS to match closer zones

2020-04-26 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Currently several countries are getting routed to proxies which are timing
out for them. This should 'fix' some though I expect we will need to break
this out further per continental region.

diff --git a/roles/dns/files/named.conf b/roles/dns/files/named.conf
index c8b95b9..135ec69 100644
--- a/roles/dns/files/named.conf
+++ b/roles/dns/files/named.conf
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ view "RDU2" {

 // The zones
 view "NA" {
-match-clients { US; CA; MX; };
+match-clients { US; CA; MX; BM; GL; };
 recursion no;
 // no rate-limit on internal requests
 rate-limit {
@@ -636,9 +636,10 @@ view "NA" {
 };


-// This is not "EU" countries, I just wanted a short way to represent
Europe.
+// This should have been EME and during the next freeze break should be
made as such.
 view "EU" {
-match-clients { AT; BE; BG; CY; CZ; DE; DK; EE; ES; FI; FR; GR;
HU; IT; LT; LU; LV; MT; NL; PL; PT; RO; RU; SE; UA; GB; IE; IS; NO; };
+   match-clients { AD; AL; AT; AX; BA; BE; BG; CH; CZ; DE; DK; EE; ES;
FI; FO; FR; GB; GG; GI; GR; HR; HU; IE; IM; IS; IT; JE; LI; LT; LU; LV; MC;
ME; MK; MT; NL; NO; PL; PT; RO; RS; RU; SE; SI; SJ; SK; SM; UA; VA; AE; AM;
AZ; BH; CY; GE; IL; IQ; JO; KW; LB; OM; QA; SA; TR; YE; };
+
 recursion no;
 zone "fedoraproject.org" {
 type master;
@@ -660,7 +661,7 @@ view "EU" {
 };

 view "APAC" {
-match-clients { AE; AF; AM; AU; AZ; BD; BH; BN; BT; CC; CN; CX;
CY; GE; HK; ID; IL; IN; IO; IQ; IR; JO; JP; KG; KH; KP; KR; KW; KZ; LA; LB;
LK; MM; MN; MO; MV; MY; NP; NZ; OM; PH; PK; PS; QA; RU; SA; SG; SY; TH; TJ;
TL; TM; TR; TW; UZ; VN; YE; };
+match-clients { AF; BD; BN; BT; CN; HK; ID; IN; JP; KG; KH; KZ;
LA; LK; MM; MN; MO; MV; MY; NP; PH; PK; SG; TH; TJ; TL; TM; UZ; VN; AS; AU;
CC; CK; CX; FJ; FM; GU; HM; KI; MH; MP; NC; NF; NR; NU; NZ; PF; PG; PN; PW;
SB; TK; TO; TV; UM; VU; WF; WS; }
 recursion no;
 zone "fedoraproject.org" {
 type master;


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: reboot ppc9-02

2020-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+!

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 18:24, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
> hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
> stuck hardware.
>
> I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
> like to update and reboot ppc9-02. Due to existing builds this may be
> later this weekend...
>
> +1s?
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: Reboot of ppc09-02

2020-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Server has some problems with services and guests. We would like to reboot
the system to clear some issues being seen.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: reboot ppc9-02

2020-04-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
ppc9-02 is in a odd state. Guests are running ok, but the host itself is
hanging any ansible runs against it. :( Usually this is a sign of some
stuck hardware. 

I've disabled the builders on it and once builds finish on them I would
like to update and reboot ppc9-02. Due to existing builds this may be
later this weekend... 

+1s?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Pre GA tasks

2020-04-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
Reviewed updated diff. +1


On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 12:41, Mohan Boddu  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > 2 things:
> >
> > I do not think we want to change pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
> > today. If we do, gnome-software will start offering f32 updates to
> > people before release.
> >
> > I don't think we want to set Frozen: False yet, thats the infra freeze,
> > it's still on until next wed.
>
> Thanks Kevin, here's the updated diff.
>
> >
> > Otherwise looks ok to me.
> >
> > kevin
> > ___
> > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR: Pre GA tasks

2020-04-24 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> 2 things:
>
> I do not think we want to change pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
> today. If we do, gnome-software will start offering f32 updates to
> people before release.
>
> I don't think we want to set Frozen: False yet, thats the infra freeze,
> it's still on until next wed.

Thanks Kevin, here's the updated diff.

>
> Otherwise looks ok to me.
>
> kevin
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
index 97afa7c..c8fdc31 100644
--- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
+++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ ostree = {
 # In the case of testing, also inject the last stable updates
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/f[[ release.version_int ]]-updates/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/",
 [% endif %]
-# For F32 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/
-[% if release.version_int == 32 %]
+# For F33 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/
+[% if release.version_int == 33 %]
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"
 [% else %]
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched
index e3a5bd3..74f08d9 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/branched
+++ b/roles/releng/files/branched
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 # branched compose
-MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/branched.XX` && cd $TMPDIR && git clone https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper branched-compose "PYTHONMALLOC=debug LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./nightly.sh" && sudo -u ftpsync /usr/local/bin/update-fullfiletimelist -l /pub/fedora-secondary/update-fullfiletimelist.lock -t /pub fedora fedora-secondary
+#MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+#15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/branched.XX` && cd $TMPDIR && git clone https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper branched-compose "PYTHONMALLOC=debug LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./nightly.sh" && sudo -u ftpsync /usr/local/bin/update-fullfiletimelist -l /pub/fedora-secondary/update-fullfiletimelist.lock -t /pub fedora fedora-secondary
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates b/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
index 8c1df3a..0ef075f 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
+++ b/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 15 6 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF30.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f30 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
 
-#Fedora 29 Cloud nightly compose
-#MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-#15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF29.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f29 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
+#Fedora 32 Cloud nightly compose
+MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF32.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
 
 #Fedora 31 Cloud nightly compose
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/container-updates b/roles/releng/files/container-updates
index 769b78f..ac0dc25 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/container-updates
+++ b/roles/releng/files/container-updates
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 45 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/containerF30.XX` 

Re: FBR: Pre GA tasks

2020-04-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.
> 
> Thanks.

2 things: 

I do not think we want to change pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
today. If we do, gnome-software will start offering f32 updates to
people before release. 

I don't think we want to set Frozen: False yet, thats the infra freeze,
it's still on until next wed. 

Otherwise looks ok to me. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR: Pre GA tasks

2020-04-24 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi,

The following changes are needed for pre ga tasks, please review them.

Thanks.
diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
index 97afa7c..c8fdc31 100644
--- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
+++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ ostree = {
 # In the case of testing, also inject the last stable updates
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/updates/f[[ release.version_int ]]-updates/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/",
 [% endif %]
-# For F32 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/
-[% if release.version_int == 32 %]
+# For F33 the compose location is going to be under /compose/branched/
+[% if release.version_int == 33 %]
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"
 [% else %]
 "https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/$basearch/os/"
diff --git a/roles/pkgdb-proxy/files/pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json b/roles/pkgdb-proxy/files/pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
index c3555df..4b197dc 100644
--- a/roles/pkgdb-proxy/files/pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
+++ b/roles/pkgdb-proxy/files/pkgdb-gnome-software-collections.json
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@
   "version": "devel"
 },
 {
-  "allow_retire": true,
+  "allow_retire": false,
   "branchname": "f32",
   "date_created": "2014-05-14 12:36:15",
   "date_updated": "2020-02-11 17:07:23",
   "dist_tag": ".fc32",
   "koji_name": "f32",
   "name": "Fedora",
-  "status": "Under Development",
+  "status": "Active",
   "version": "32"
 },
 {
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/branched b/roles/releng/files/branched
index e3a5bd3..74f08d9 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/branched
+++ b/roles/releng/files/branched
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 # branched compose
-MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/branched.XX` && cd $TMPDIR && git clone https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper branched-compose "PYTHONMALLOC=debug LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./nightly.sh" && sudo -u ftpsync /usr/local/bin/update-fullfiletimelist -l /pub/fedora-secondary/update-fullfiletimelist.lock -t /pub fedora fedora-secondary
+#MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+#15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/branched.XX` && cd $TMPDIR && git clone https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && /usr/local/bin/lock-wrapper branched-compose "PYTHONMALLOC=debug LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./nightly.sh" && sudo -u ftpsync /usr/local/bin/update-fullfiletimelist -l /pub/fedora-secondary/update-fullfiletimelist.lock -t /pub fedora fedora-secondary
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates b/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
index 8c1df3a..0ef075f 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
+++ b/roles/releng/files/cloud-updates
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 15 6 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF30.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f30 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
 
-#Fedora 29 Cloud nightly compose
-#MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-#15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF29.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f29 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
+#Fedora 32 Cloud nightly compose
+MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+15 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/CloudF32.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f32 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./cloud-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
 
 #Fedora 31 Cloud nightly compose
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
diff --git a/roles/releng/files/container-updates b/roles/releng/files/container-updates
index 769b78f..ac0dc25 100644
--- a/roles/releng/files/container-updates
+++ b/roles/releng/files/container-updates
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 MAILTO=releng-c...@lists.fedoraproject.org
 45 7 * * * root TMPDIR=`mktemp -d /tmp/containerF30.XX` && pushd $TMPDIR && git clone -n https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora.git && cd pungi-fedora && git checkout f30 && LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ./container-nightly.sh RC-$(date "+\%Y\%m\%d").0 && popd && rm -rf $TMPDIR
 
-# Fedora 29 Container Updates nightly compose

Re: FBR (?) STAGING: Support Fedora ELN for Greenwave

2020-04-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 04:24:05PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 

Looks fine to me. 

Do note that staging isn't frozen ever, so we can just apply this and do
whats needed to make it live (run greenwave playbook, starting new
greenwave image build, deploy new pods). 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: FBR (?) STAGING: Support Fedora ELN for Greenwave

2020-04-23 Thread Mohan Boddu
LGTM +1

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Stephen Gallagher  wrote:
>
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


FBR (?) STAGING: Support Fedora ELN for Greenwave

2020-04-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher

From 6c9da110bdb380beb0192d4188725e91d2dc3549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher 
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:23:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] STAGING: Support Fedora ELN for Greenwave

Signed-off-by: Stephen Gallagher 
---
 roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml | 12 
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml b/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml
index a927ae500a1c8a3d9ab2a56542d7ebea74de82dd..68738dce40900ef081003af13f3fe0bfe66dd90b 100644
--- a/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml
+++ b/roles/openshift-apps/greenwave/templates/fedora.yaml
@@ -52,10 +52,13 @@ rules:
 
 --- !Policy
 id: "taskotron_release_critical_tasks_for_testing"
 product_versions:
   - fedora-rawhide
+{% if env == 'staging' %}
+  - fedora-eln
+{% endif %}
   - fedora-33
   - fedora-32
   - fedora-31
   - fedora-30
   - fedora-29
@@ -67,10 +70,13 @@ rules:
 
 --- !Policy
 id: "taskotron_release_critical_tasks_for_stable"
 product_versions:
   - fedora-rawhide
+{% if env == 'staging' %}
+  - fedora-eln
+{% endif %}
   - fedora-33
   - fedora-32
   - fedora-31
   - fedora-30
   - fedora-29
@@ -131,10 +137,13 @@ rules: []
 --- !Policy
 # openQA policies
 id: "openqa_release_critical_tasks_for_testing"
 product_versions:
   - fedora-rawhide
+{% if env == 'staging' %}
+  - fedora-eln
+{% endif %}
   - fedora-32
   - fedora-31
   - fedora-30
   - fedora-29
 decision_context: bodhi_update_push_testing
@@ -145,10 +154,13 @@ rules:
 
 --- !Policy
 id: "openqa_release_critical_tasks_for_stable"
 product_versions:
   - fedora-rawhide
+{% if env == 'staging' %}
+  - fedora-eln
+{% endif %}
   - fedora-32
   - fedora-31
   - fedora-30
   - fedora-29
 decision_context: bodhi_update_push_stable
-- 
2.26.0

___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] fix openshift

2020-04-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:35:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
> 
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve correctly:
> registry.redhat.io.
> 
> Once Clément pointed me to the right direction, I adjusted staging as follow:
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=e371f8b0ceef30639facb7ac7a70c27beb3e689c
> and I was able to do a new build.
> 
> I would like to apply the same fix to production (ie:
> roles/hosts/files/os-hosts).
> 
> Thoughts?

+1

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] fix openshift

2020-04-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon  wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve correctly:
> registry.redhat.io.
>
> Once Clément pointed me to the right direction, I adjusted staging as follow:
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=e371f8b0ceef30639facb7ac7a70c27beb3e689c
> and I was able to do a new build.
>
> I would like to apply the same fix to production (ie:
> roles/hosts/files/os-hosts).
>
> Thoughts?
>

+1 from me. Seems small, simple, and reasonable to do.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [FBR] fix openshift

2020-04-23 Thread Clement Verna
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 14:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:

> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning as I was trying to build a new distgit-bugzilla-sync build in
> staging, I ran into the issue that the build never started.
> It seems it was related to openshift not being able to resolve correctly:
> registry.redhat.io.
>
> Once Clément pointed me to the right direction, I adjusted staging as
> follow:
>
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=e371f8b0ceef30639facb7ac7a70c27beb3e689c
> and I was able to do a new build.
>
> I would like to apply the same fix to production (ie:
> roles/hosts/files/os-hosts).
>
> Thoughts?
>

It is a small change and without it builds are broken so +1 from me.


> Thanks,
> Pierre
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >