Re: [Inkscape-board] [REFERENDUM] Donation to SFC

2015-03-17 Thread Josh Andler
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote:
 My impression from Karen's e-mail was that she felt for previous to
 discussing the FSA a donation was reasonable, but for the future they'd
 prefer the 10%.

Correct. That was my impression too. But putting language in the FSA
isn't leaving a donation as something that could be considered a
reasonable choice for us to make, it's making it a requirement. We're
all on board for the mandatory 10%, but weaseling in the language
about a required donation (I brought it up as uncomfortable and they
just rephrased the donation language and kept it in the FSA, but
didn't really address why they thought it really belonged in there...
my interpretation is that they feel we're obligated to do it and they
will bind us to do it) feels like they don't trust us to make the
donation outside the terms of the FSA.

I hate to use wording like weaseling, but they're not the best at
addressing these concerns, they just make modifications as they see
fit. I've worked for a couple law firms (most of my professional life
has been working for them) and still occasionally do contract work for
other firms, so I am aware of how changes in documents usually take
place... this doesn't feel like they're being above board and direct
about how they see things should be handled.

Cheers,
Josh

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
___
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board


Re: [Inkscape-board] [REFERENDUM] Donation to SFC

2015-03-17 Thread Tavmjong Bah

1. Yes
2. c or e, flat amount of $400/yr for 2009-2012, 10% from 2012 onward.

I agree that the donation should not be mentioned in the FSA


On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 15:03 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
 [Reposting]
 
 A majority vote of the current board members is required for the following
 proposal relating to retroactive payment to SFC.
 
 Proposal:
 
 1. In light of the services provided by the Software Freedom Consortium to
date, given on voluntary basis, should we provide a retroactive
donation to the SFC?
 
 [ ] Yes, donate to SFC in thanks for their past support.
 [ ] No.  We should pay only the required 10% fee going forward
 from date of signature of the new FSA.
 
 2.  Assuming we should donate to the SFC, how much should we donate to
 SFC?
 
 [ ] a.  10% of gross income since we have been a member (9 years).
 [ ] b.  10% of gross income since initiation of FSA #2 discussions
 (2012).
 [ ] c.  A flat amount of $400 per year that we have been a member
 (2009).  This amounts to $3600.
 [ ] d.  A flat amount of $400 per year since FSA #2 (2012).
   This amounts to $1200.
 [ ] e.  Some other amount:
   _
 
 Background:
 
 Tav writes,
 I agree with Josh and Ted that a donation to the SFC is appropriate for
 their past work on our behalf. Can we agree on the amount? I would
 propose $400 for each year we have been a member. We have been a member
 for 9 years so that would be $3600.
 
 This assumes that the 10% kicks in on the date the new FSA is approved.
 
 
 We were asked by Bradley to provide 10% of our revenue to SFC in 2012:
 
  (b) As I've discussed with a number of you, including Jon, Josh and
  Tavmjong, Inkscape has received fiscal sponsorship services
  from Conservancy at no charge since 2006.  Back when
  Conservancy was founded, I was an SFLC employee and SFLC was
  subsidizing my time -- effectively donating staff time to
  Conservancy.  This ceased in early 2008, and I served as a
  volunteer for Conservancy on nights/weekends until 2011, when I
  became a full-time employee -- which was the only way to keep
  it going with the services it promises (the other option would
  have been to shut down Conservancy).  Since then, to maintain
  legal services as part of the service plan once SFLC shrunk
  further, we hired Tony as well.  We get a lot done with a staff
  of two, but obviously we need financial resources to be able to
  provide these services.
 
  Conservancy's Board of Directors voted about a year ago that
  all member projects should be required to give 10% of their
  earmarked revenue to support Conservancy to continue to provide
  services.  This is a standard way for a fiscal sponsor to
  operate, and we were lucky before that we weren't required to
  do this, and I'd been waiting to bother Inkscape with this
  since you are one of our older members. (We haven't taken a new
  member for anything other than 10% in a few years, BTW).  I
  hope a 10% arrangement as we use with other projects now will
  be acceptable to you, and I and Tony are happy to discuss
  further this issue.
 
 In December 2012, we voted generally favorable to paying the 10% fee
 going forward from 2012.  There were questions regarding pass-thru of
 Google SOC payments and so on, but generally favored the basic idea:
 
 
 https://sourceforge.net/p/inkscape/mailman/inkscape-board/?viewmonth=201212
 
 For comparison, Software in the Public Interest (SPI), an organization
 analogous to the SFC, provides similar services and takes 5% of net
 (after credit card, etc. fees):
 
 http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/associated-project-howto/
 
 
 
 --
 Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
 by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
 things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
 news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
 conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
 ___
 Inkscape-board mailing list
 Inkscape-board@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board



--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation 

Re: [Inkscape-board] [REFERENDUM] Donation to SFC

2015-03-17 Thread Ted Gould
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 23:22 -0700, Josh Andler wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ted Gould t...@gould.cx wrote:
  My impression from Karen's e-mail was that she felt for previous to
  discussing the FSA a donation was reasonable, but for the future they'd
  prefer the 10%.
 
 Correct. That was my impression too. But putting language in the FSA
 isn't leaving a donation as something that could be considered a
 reasonable choice for us to make, it's making it a requirement. We're
 all on board for the mandatory 10%, but weaseling in the language
 about a required donation (I brought it up as uncomfortable and they
 just rephrased the donation language and kept it in the FSA, but
 didn't really address why they thought it really belonged in there...
 my interpretation is that they feel we're obligated to do it and they
 will bind us to do it) feels like they don't trust us to make the
 donation outside the terms of the FSA.



I don't have inside knowledge, but my guess would be that it's more
about cash flow and accounting more than trusting us to do it. By
dealing with it as money comes in they actually end up with a flow
rather than impulse based accounting :-) Which can work, but when you
have things like salaries and bills it means you have to keep much more
reserves.


 I hate to use wording like weaseling, but they're not the best at
 addressing these concerns, they just make modifications as they see
 fit. I've worked for a couple law firms (most of my professional life
 has been working for them) and still occasionally do contract work for
 other firms, so I am aware of how changes in documents usually take
 place... this doesn't feel like they're being above board and direct
 about how they see things should be handled.


It seems that it is hip today to put legal documents in version control,
should we suggest that?

Ted

--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___
Inkscape-board mailing list
Inkscape-board@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board