Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2022-01-20 Thread Lucas De Marchi

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 03:31:34AM +, Tolakanahalli Pradeep, Madhumitha 
wrote:

On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 13:37 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 03:18:57AM +, Tolakanahalli Pradeep,
Madhumitha wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 21:37 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli
> > Pradeep
> > wrote:
> > > Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> > > convention
> > > followed in the i915 driver code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> > > madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>

I was checking to apply this today, but BAT is failing on CI and it
didn't trigger the full run. Error seems unrelated and I don't think
this would trigger any error in the machines in CI, but I'd prefer to
merge this with a clean run.

Can you re-submit or trigger it again via patchwork if the patch
still
applies?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi


The error does seem pretty random. I've triggered a rerun, awaiting
results.


CI results are now clean. Pushed.

thanks
Lucas De Marchi


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2022-01-19 Thread Tolakanahalli Pradeep, Madhumitha
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 13:37 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 03:18:57AM +, Tolakanahalli Pradeep,
> Madhumitha wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 21:37 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli
> > > Pradeep
> > > wrote:
> > > > Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> > > > convention
> > > > followed in the i915 driver code.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> > > > madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>
> 
> I was checking to apply this today, but BAT is failing on CI and it
> didn't trigger the full run. Error seems unrelated and I don't think
> this would trigger any error in the machines in CI, but I'd prefer to
> merge this with a clean run.
> 
> Can you re-submit or trigger it again via patchwork if the patch
> still
> applies?
> 
> thanks
> Lucas De Marchi

The error does seem pretty random. I've triggered a rerun, awaiting
results.

Thanks!
- Madhumitha


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2022-01-18 Thread Lucas De Marchi

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 03:18:57AM +, Tolakanahalli Pradeep, Madhumitha 
wrote:

On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 21:37 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:

On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep
wrote:
> Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> convention
> followed in the i915 driver code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>


I was checking to apply this today, but BAT is failing on CI and it
didn't trigger the full run. Error seems unrelated and I don't think
this would trigger any error in the machines in CI, but I'd prefer to
merge this with a clean run.

Can you re-submit or trigger it again via patchwork if the patch still
applies?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2022-01-04 Thread Yokoyama, Caz
Reviewed-by: Caz Yokoyama 
-caz

On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 03:18 +, Tolakanahalli Pradeep, Madhumitha
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 21:37 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep
> > wrote:
> > > Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> > > convention
> > > followed in the i915 driver code.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> > > madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 14 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > index a69b28d65a9b..7616a3906b9e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > > @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
> > > __stringify(major) "_"   \
> > > __stringify(minor) ".bin"
> > >  
> > > -#define GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> > > +#define DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
> > >  
> > > -#define GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
> > > +#define DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> > Why the order of GEN12/13 and VER12/13 is reversed?
> > Other than that, LGTM.
> > -caz
> 
> I had first defined GEN13 below GEN12, interchanged them to follow
> the usual convention of latest-gen-first.
> 
> - Madhumitha
> 
> > >  
> > >  #define ADLP_DMC_PATH  DMC_PATH(adlp, 2, 14)
> > >  #define ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED  DMC_VERSION(2, 14)
> > > @@ -684,23 +684,23 @@ void intel_dmc_ucode_init(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = ADLP_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version =
> > > ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > } else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv)) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = ADLS_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version =
> > > ADLS_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > } else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = DG1_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version = DG1_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = RKL_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version = RKL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = TGL_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version = TGL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11) {
> > > dmc->fw_path = ICL_DMC_PATH;
> > > dmc->required_version = ICL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2021-12-22 Thread Tolakanahalli Pradeep, Madhumitha
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 21:37 +, Yokoyama, Caz wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep
> wrote:
> > Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> > convention
> > followed in the i915 driver code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> > madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 14 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > index a69b28d65a9b..7616a3906b9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> > @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
> > __stringify(major) "_"   \
> > __stringify(minor) ".bin"
> >  
> > -#define GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> > +#define DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
> >  
> > -#define GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
> > +#define DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> Why the order of GEN12/13 and VER12/13 is reversed?
> Other than that, LGTM.
> -caz

I had first defined GEN13 below GEN12, interchanged them to follow
the usual convention of latest-gen-first.

- Madhumitha

> >  
> >  #define ADLP_DMC_PATH  DMC_PATH(adlp, 2, 14)
> >  #define ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED  DMC_VERSION(2, 14)
> > @@ -684,23 +684,23 @@ void intel_dmc_ucode_init(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
> > dmc->fw_path = ADLP_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > } else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv)) {
> > dmc->fw_path = ADLS_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = ADLS_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > } else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
> > dmc->fw_path = DG1_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = DG1_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > dmc->fw_path = RKL_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = RKL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > dmc->fw_path = TGL_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = TGL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> > -   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > +   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> > } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11) {
> > dmc->fw_path = ICL_DMC_PATH;
> > dmc->required_version = ICL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;



Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2021-12-17 Thread Yokoyama, Caz
On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 19:41 -0800, Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep
wrote:
> Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming
> convention
> followed in the i915 driver code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep <
> madhumitha.tolakanahalli.prad...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 14 +++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> index a69b28d65a9b..7616a3906b9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
> @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
>   __stringify(major) "_"   \
>   __stringify(minor) ".bin"
>  
> -#define GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZEICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
> +#define DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE0x2
>  
> -#define GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE0x2
> +#define DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZEICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
Why the order of GEN12/13 and VER12/13 is reversed?
Other than that, LGTM.
-caz

>  
>  #define ADLP_DMC_PATHDMC_PATH(adlp, 2, 14)
>  #define ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIREDDMC_VERSION(2, 14)
> @@ -684,23 +684,23 @@ void intel_dmc_ucode_init(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
>   dmc->fw_path = ADLP_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> - dmc->max_fw_size = GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> + dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>   } else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv)) {
>   dmc->fw_path = ADLS_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = ADLS_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> - dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> + dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>   } else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
>   dmc->fw_path = DG1_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = DG1_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> - dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> + dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>   } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
>   dmc->fw_path = RKL_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = RKL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> - dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> + dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>   } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>   dmc->fw_path = TGL_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = TGL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
> - dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
> + dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
>   } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11) {
>   dmc->fw_path = ICL_DMC_PATH;
>   dmc->required_version = ICL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dmc: Eliminate remnant GEN references

2021-12-16 Thread Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep
Replace GEN with DISPLAY_VER, in line with the naming convention
followed in the i915 driver code.

Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Tolakanahalli Pradeep 

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c | 14 +++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
index a69b28d65a9b..7616a3906b9e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
__stringify(major) "_"   \
__stringify(minor) ".bin"
 
-#define GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
+#define DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
 
-#define GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  0x2
+#define DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE  ICL_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE
 
 #define ADLP_DMC_PATH  DMC_PATH(adlp, 2, 14)
 #define ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED  DMC_VERSION(2, 14)
@@ -684,23 +684,23 @@ void intel_dmc_ucode_init(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
dmc->fw_path = ADLP_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = ADLP_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
+   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER13_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_S(dev_priv)) {
dmc->fw_path = ADLS_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = ADLS_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
+   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
dmc->fw_path = DG1_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = DG1_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
+   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
dmc->fw_path = RKL_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = RKL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
+   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
dmc->fw_path = TGL_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = TGL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-   dmc->max_fw_size = GEN12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
+   dmc->max_fw_size = DISPLAY_VER12_DMC_MAX_FW_SIZE;
} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 11) {
dmc->fw_path = ICL_DMC_PATH;
dmc->required_version = ICL_DMC_VERSION_REQUIRED;
-- 
2.33.1