Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:28:44PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy and the reader sane. Suggested-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) return end; } -static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, - struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, - unsigned long end) +static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long end) { struct i915_mmu_object *mo; unsigned long serial; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart: goto restart; } - spin_unlock(mn-lock); + return NULL; } static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, @@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */ while (next end) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL; - obj = NULL; spin_lock(mn-lock); if (mn-has_linear) - return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); - if (serial == mn-serial) + it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); + else if (serial == mn-serial) it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end); else it = interval_tree_iter_first(mn-objects, start, end); -- 1.9.1 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block
Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy and the reader sane. Suggested-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) return end; } -static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, -struct mm_struct *mm, -unsigned long start, -unsigned long end) +static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long end) { struct i915_mmu_object *mo; unsigned long serial; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart: goto restart; } - spin_unlock(mn-lock); + return NULL; } static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, @@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */ while (next end) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL; - obj = NULL; spin_lock(mn-lock); if (mn-has_linear) - return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); - if (serial == mn-serial) + it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); + else if (serial == mn-serial) it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end); else it = interval_tree_iter_first(mn-objects, start, end); -- 1.9.1 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block
All of the NULL tests are a bit complicated but since they are there anyway, I guess it is reasonable to take advantage of them. julia On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Chris Wilson wrote: Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy and the reader sane. Suggested-by: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) return end; } -static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, - struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long start, - unsigned long end) +static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long end) { struct i915_mmu_object *mo; unsigned long serial; @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart: goto restart; } - spin_unlock(mn-lock); + return NULL; } static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, @@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn, end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */ while (next end) { - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL; - obj = NULL; spin_lock(mn-lock); if (mn-has_linear) - return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); - if (serial == mn-serial) + it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end); + else if (serial == mn-serial) it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end); else it = interval_tree_iter_first(mn-objects, start, end); -- 1.9.1 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx