Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block

2014-07-25 Thread Daniel Vetter 
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:28:44PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the
> same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy
> and the reader sane.
> 
> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
> Cc: Julia Lawall 

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 -
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   return end;
>  }
>  
> -static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
> -  struct mm_struct *mm,
> -  unsigned long start,
> -  unsigned long end)
> +static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
> +   struct mm_struct *mm,
> +   unsigned long start,
> +   unsigned long end)
>  {
>   struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
>   unsigned long serial;
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart:
>   goto restart;
>   }
>  
> - spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
> + return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier 
> *_mn,
> @@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void 
> i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
>  
>   end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is 
> exclusive */
>   while (next < end) {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
>  
> - obj = NULL;
>   spin_lock(&mn->lock);
>   if (mn->has_linear)
> - return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
> - if (serial == mn->serial)
> + it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
> + else if (serial == mn->serial)
>   it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end);
>   else
>   it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block

2014-07-24 Thread Julia Lawall 
All of the NULL tests are a bit complicated but since they are there
anyway, I guess it is reasonable to take advantage of them.

julia

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Chris Wilson wrote:

> Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the
> same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy
> and the reader sane.
>
> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
> Cc: Julia Lawall 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 -
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   return end;
>  }
>
> -static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
> -  struct mm_struct *mm,
> -  unsigned long start,
> -  unsigned long end)
> +static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
> +   struct mm_struct *mm,
> +   unsigned long start,
> +   unsigned long end)
>  {
>   struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
>   unsigned long serial;
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart:
>   goto restart;
>   }
>
> - spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
> + return NULL;
>  }
>
>  static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier 
> *_mn,
> @@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void 
> i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
>
>   end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is 
> exclusive */
>   while (next < end) {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
>
> - obj = NULL;
>   spin_lock(&mn->lock);
>   if (mn->has_linear)
> - return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
> - if (serial == mn->serial)
> + it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
> + else if (serial == mn->serial)
>   it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end);
>   else
>   it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/userptr: Keep spin_lock/unlock in the same block

2014-07-24 Thread Chris Wilson 
Move the code around in order to acquire and release the spinlock in the
same function and in the same block. This keeps static analysers happy
and the reader sane.

Suggested-by: Julia Lawall 
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Julia Lawall 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 17 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 12358fd..4ef5a92 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -96,10 +96,10 @@ static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct 
drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
return end;
 }
 
-static void invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
-struct mm_struct *mm,
-unsigned long start,
-unsigned long end)
+static void *invalidate_range__linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
 {
struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
unsigned long serial;
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ restart:
goto restart;
}
 
-   spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
+   return NULL;
 }
 
 static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier 
*_mn,
@@ -138,13 +138,12 @@ static void 
i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
 
end--; /* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is 
exclusive */
while (next < end) {
-   struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+   struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
 
-   obj = NULL;
spin_lock(&mn->lock);
if (mn->has_linear)
-   return invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
-   if (serial == mn->serial)
+   it = invalidate_range__linear(mn, mm, start, end);
+   else if (serial == mn->serial)
it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, next, end);
else
it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end);
-- 
1.9.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx