Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove runtime suspended boolean from intel_runtime_pm struct

2023-09-17 Thread Hogander, Jouni
On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 18:01 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:02:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander 
> > wrote:
> > > It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information
> > > in
> > > intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in
> > > underlying device
> > > structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain
> > > suspended
> > > status information when needed.
> > 
> > I started wondering if this is racy, and my conclusion is that it's
> > "less" racy than the original. rpm->suspended gets toggled in the
> > middle
> > of the suspend/resume sequences. So it could be halfway. Dunno if
> > anything *after* those toggles depends on the state having been
> > changed
> > already; didn't find any. Maybe Imre has a better idea.
> > 
> > Also, pm_runtime_suspended() seems more reliable when
> > suspend/resume
> > fails.
> 
> The flag was added in the initial runtime PM enabling patch to detect
> MMIO accesses while runtime suspended, looks like
> pm_runtime_suspended()
> would've worked ok already at that point.
> 
> I wondered how the above detection would change in the system suspend
> /
> resume handlers but that looks ok as well with the disable_depth
> check
> in pm_runtime_suspended():
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak 
> 
> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula 
> > 

Thank you Imre and Jani for checking my patch. This is now merged.

BR,

Jouni Högander
> > 
> > > 
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula 
> > > Cc: Imre Deak 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c  | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c    | 1 -
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h    | 4 ++--
> > >  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > index 68cf5e6b0b46..889bb26009a2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > > bool is_enabled;
> > >  
> > > -   if (dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended)
> > > +   if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev_priv->drm.dev))
> > > return false;
> > >  
> > > is_enabled = true;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > index f8dbee7a5af7..cd98ee740976 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > @@ -1569,8 +1569,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct
> > > device *kdev)
> > > if (root_pdev)
> > > pci_d3cold_disable(root_pdev);
> > >  
> > > -   rpm->suspended = true;
> > > -
> > > /*
> > >  * FIXME: We really should find a document that
> > > references the arguments
> > >  * used below!
> > > @@ -1621,7 +1619,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct
> > > device *kdev)
> > > disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
> > >  
> > > intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, PCI_D0);
> > > -   rpm->suspended = false;
> > >  
> > > root_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
> > > if (root_pdev)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > index 4008bb09fdb5..a60bab177c55 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > > @@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ static void capture_gen(struct
> > > i915_gpu_coredump *error)
> > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
> > >  
> > > error->wakelock = atomic_read(
> > > >runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
> > > -   error->suspended = i915->runtime_pm.suspended;
> > > +   error->suspended = pm_runtime_suspended(i915->drm.dev);
> > >  
> > > error->iommu = i915_vtd_active(i915);
> > > error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(>gpu_error);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > index 6d8e5e5c0cba..8743153fad87 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > > @@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_init_early(struct
> > > intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> > >  
> > > rpm->kdev = kdev;
> > > rpm->available = HAS_RUNTIME_PM(i915);
> > > -   rpm->suspended = false;
> > > atomic_set(>wakeref_count, 0);
> > >  
> > > init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(rpm);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> 

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove runtime suspended boolean from intel_runtime_pm struct

2023-09-13 Thread Imre Deak
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:02:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander  wrote:
> > It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
> > intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
> > structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain suspended
> > status information when needed.
> 
> I started wondering if this is racy, and my conclusion is that it's
> "less" racy than the original. rpm->suspended gets toggled in the middle
> of the suspend/resume sequences. So it could be halfway. Dunno if
> anything *after* those toggles depends on the state having been changed
> already; didn't find any. Maybe Imre has a better idea.
> 
> Also, pm_runtime_suspended() seems more reliable when suspend/resume
> fails.

The flag was added in the initial runtime PM enabling patch to detect
MMIO accesses while runtime suspended, looks like pm_runtime_suspended()
would've worked ok already at that point.

I wondered how the above detection would change in the system suspend /
resume handlers but that looks ok as well with the disable_depth check
in pm_runtime_suspended():
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak 

> Acked-by: Jani Nikula 
> 
> 
> >
> > Cc: Jani Nikula 
> > Cc: Imre Deak 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c| 1 -
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h| 4 ++--
> >  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > index 68cf5e6b0b46..889bb26009a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct 
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > bool is_enabled;
> >  
> > -   if (dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended)
> > +   if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev_priv->drm.dev))
> > return false;
> >  
> > is_enabled = true;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > index f8dbee7a5af7..cd98ee740976 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > @@ -1569,8 +1569,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
> > if (root_pdev)
> > pci_d3cold_disable(root_pdev);
> >  
> > -   rpm->suspended = true;
> > -
> > /*
> >  * FIXME: We really should find a document that references the arguments
> >  * used below!
> > @@ -1621,7 +1619,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
> > disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
> >  
> > intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, PCI_D0);
> > -   rpm->suspended = false;
> >  
> > root_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
> > if (root_pdev)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > index 4008bb09fdb5..a60bab177c55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > @@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ static void capture_gen(struct i915_gpu_coredump 
> > *error)
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
> >  
> > error->wakelock = atomic_read(>runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
> > -   error->suspended = i915->runtime_pm.suspended;
> > +   error->suspended = pm_runtime_suspended(i915->drm.dev);
> >  
> > error->iommu = i915_vtd_active(i915);
> > error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(>gpu_error);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 6d8e5e5c0cba..8743153fad87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_init_early(struct 
> > intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> >  
> > rpm->kdev = kdev;
> > rpm->available = HAS_RUNTIME_PM(i915);
> > -   rpm->suspended = false;
> > atomic_set(>wakeref_count, 0);
> >  
> > init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(rpm);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> > index 764b183ae452..f79cda7a2503 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >  #ifndef __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> >  #define __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
> >  
> > +#include 
> >  #include 
> >  
> >  #include "intel_wakeref.h"
> > @@ -43,7 +44,6 @@ struct intel_runtime_pm {
> > atomic_t wakeref_count;
> > struct device *kdev; /* points to i915->drm.dev */
> > bool available;
> > -   bool suspended;
> > bool irqs_enabled;
> > 

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove runtime suspended boolean from intel_runtime_pm struct

2023-09-13 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jouni Högander  wrote:
> It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
> intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
> structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain suspended
> status information when needed.

I started wondering if this is racy, and my conclusion is that it's
"less" racy than the original. rpm->suspended gets toggled in the middle
of the suspend/resume sequences. So it could be halfway. Dunno if
anything *after* those toggles depends on the state having been changed
already; didn't find any. Maybe Imre has a better idea.

Also, pm_runtime_suspended() seems more reliable when suspend/resume
fails.

Acked-by: Jani Nikula 


>
> Cc: Jani Nikula 
> Cc: Imre Deak 
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c  | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c| 1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h| 4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index 68cf5e6b0b46..889bb26009a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   struct i915_power_well *power_well;
>   bool is_enabled;
>  
> - if (dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended)
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev_priv->drm.dev))
>   return false;
>  
>   is_enabled = true;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index f8dbee7a5af7..cd98ee740976 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -1569,8 +1569,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
>   if (root_pdev)
>   pci_d3cold_disable(root_pdev);
>  
> - rpm->suspended = true;
> -
>   /*
>* FIXME: We really should find a document that references the arguments
>* used below!
> @@ -1621,7 +1619,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
>   disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
>  
>   intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, PCI_D0);
> - rpm->suspended = false;
>  
>   root_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
>   if (root_pdev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 4008bb09fdb5..a60bab177c55 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ static void capture_gen(struct i915_gpu_coredump *error)
>   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
>  
>   error->wakelock = atomic_read(>runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
> - error->suspended = i915->runtime_pm.suspended;
> + error->suspended = pm_runtime_suspended(i915->drm.dev);
>  
>   error->iommu = i915_vtd_active(i915);
>   error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(>gpu_error);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 6d8e5e5c0cba..8743153fad87 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_init_early(struct intel_runtime_pm 
> *rpm)
>  
>   rpm->kdev = kdev;
>   rpm->available = HAS_RUNTIME_PM(i915);
> - rpm->suspended = false;
>   atomic_set(>wakeref_count, 0);
>  
>   init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(rpm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> index 764b183ae452..f79cda7a2503 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #ifndef __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
>  #define __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
>  
> +#include 
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "intel_wakeref.h"
> @@ -43,7 +44,6 @@ struct intel_runtime_pm {
>   atomic_t wakeref_count;
>   struct device *kdev; /* points to i915->drm.dev */
>   bool available;
> - bool suspended;
>   bool irqs_enabled;
>   bool no_wakeref_tracking;
>  
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ intel_rpm_wakelock_count(int wakeref_count)
>  static inline void
>  assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>  {
> - WARN_ONCE(rpm->suspended,
> + WARN_ONCE(pm_runtime_suspended(rpm->kdev),
> "Device suspended during HW access\n");
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove runtime suspended boolean from intel_runtime_pm struct

2023-09-13 Thread Jouni Högander
It's not necessary to carry separate suspended status information in
intel_runtime_pm struct as this information is already in underlying device
structure. Remove it and use pm_runtime_suspended() to obtain suspended
status information when needed.

Cc: Jani Nikula 
Cc: Imre Deak 

Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c| 1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h| 4 ++--
 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
index 68cf5e6b0b46..889bb26009a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct 
drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct i915_power_well *power_well;
bool is_enabled;
 
-   if (dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended)
+   if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev_priv->drm.dev))
return false;
 
is_enabled = true;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
index f8dbee7a5af7..cd98ee740976 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
@@ -1569,8 +1569,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
if (root_pdev)
pci_d3cold_disable(root_pdev);
 
-   rpm->suspended = true;
-
/*
 * FIXME: We really should find a document that references the arguments
 * used below!
@@ -1621,7 +1619,6 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
 
intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, PCI_D0);
-   rpm->suspended = false;
 
root_pdev = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
if (root_pdev)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 4008bb09fdb5..a60bab177c55 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ static void capture_gen(struct i915_gpu_coredump *error)
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
 
error->wakelock = atomic_read(>runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
-   error->suspended = i915->runtime_pm.suspended;
+   error->suspended = pm_runtime_suspended(i915->drm.dev);
 
error->iommu = i915_vtd_active(i915);
error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(>gpu_error);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 6d8e5e5c0cba..8743153fad87 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_init_early(struct intel_runtime_pm 
*rpm)
 
rpm->kdev = kdev;
rpm->available = HAS_RUNTIME_PM(i915);
-   rpm->suspended = false;
atomic_set(>wakeref_count, 0);
 
init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(rpm);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
index 764b183ae452..f79cda7a2503 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #ifndef __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
 #define __INTEL_RUNTIME_PM_H__
 
+#include 
 #include 
 
 #include "intel_wakeref.h"
@@ -43,7 +44,6 @@ struct intel_runtime_pm {
atomic_t wakeref_count;
struct device *kdev; /* points to i915->drm.dev */
bool available;
-   bool suspended;
bool irqs_enabled;
bool no_wakeref_tracking;
 
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ intel_rpm_wakelock_count(int wakeref_count)
 static inline void
 assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
 {
-   WARN_ONCE(rpm->suspended,
+   WARN_ONCE(pm_runtime_suspended(rpm->kdev),
  "Device suspended during HW access\n");
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1