Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:55:39 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: Now glamor was extracted from the xorg and be a separate library. Please checkout glamor at : git://people.freedesktop.org/~gongzg/glamor. This library implements two modules glamor and glamor_egl which are required for intel video driver to enable glamor. Hmm, I did install the glamor library. A /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamor.so is installed but the ddx is looking for a glamor_egl module. Ah, looks to be due to the checking for EGL... no checking for EGL... yes in glamor. How very confusing. ;-) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 5:20 PM To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework. On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:55:39 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: Now glamor was extracted from the xorg and be a separate library. Please checkout glamor at : git://people.freedesktop.org/~gongzg/glamor. This library implements two modules glamor and glamor_egl which are required for intel video driver to enable glamor. Hmm, I did install the glamor library. A /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamor.so is installed but the ddx is looking for a glamor_egl module. Ah, looks to be due to the checking for EGL... no checking for EGL... yes in glamor. How very confusing. ;-) I think I know the reason, there is a typo error in glamor's configure.ac which doesn't Check the required packages correctly. Please pull the latest glamor master. One of the two above checks should be checking for GBM. I guess your mesa hasn't been built with gbm enabled. Then glamor will not build glamor_egl which depends on that. Another thing need to pay attention is that when you build xserver, you need to disable glx. Sorry for the confusing. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:49:49 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 5:20 PM To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework. On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:55:39 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: Now glamor was extracted from the xorg and be a separate library. Please checkout glamor at : git://people.freedesktop.org/~gongzg/glamor. This library implements two modules glamor and glamor_egl which are required for intel video driver to enable glamor. Hmm, I did install the glamor library. A /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamor.so is installed but the ddx is looking for a glamor_egl module. Ah, looks to be due to the checking for EGL... no checking for EGL... yes in glamor. How very confusing. ;-) I think I know the reason, there is a typo error in glamor's configure.ac which doesn't Check the required packages correctly. Please pull the latest glamor master. One of the two above checks should be checking for GBM. I guess your mesa hasn't been built with gbm enabled. Then glamor will not build glamor_egl which depends on that. It was actually mesa insisting on only building egl_platform=drm and the pre-requisite egl_dri2 if and only if libxcb-dri2 was installed. Seems a bit strange for something that is supposed to be used on an X-less system. Another thing need to pay attention is that when you build xserver, you need to disable glx. Rebuild the xserver... Oh well, that rules out testing by simply replacing distro drivers. I'm having a lot of fun with building glamor as it is missing or including headers in the wrong order and deciding that XID is 8 bytes when the server was compiled with a 4 byte XID. Fun. And the usual problems with incomplete framebuffers, but hopefully that is just the glx confusion. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 6:57 PM To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework. On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:49:49 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 5:20 PM To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework. On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:55:39 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: Now glamor was extracted from the xorg and be a separate library. Please checkout glamor at : git://people.freedesktop.org/~gongzg/glamor. This library implements two modules glamor and glamor_egl which are required for intel video driver to enable glamor. Hmm, I did install the glamor library. A /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamor.so is installed but the ddx is looking for a glamor_egl module. Ah, looks to be due to the checking for EGL... no checking for EGL... yes in glamor. How very confusing. ;-) I think I know the reason, there is a typo error in glamor's configure.ac which doesn't Check the required packages correctly. Please pull the latest glamor master. One of the two above checks should be checking for GBM. I guess your mesa hasn't been built with gbm enabled. Then glamor will not build glamor_egl which depends on that. It was actually mesa insisting on only building egl_platform=drm and the pre-requisite egl_dri2 if and only if libxcb-dri2 was installed. Seems a bit strange for something that is supposed to be used on an X-less system. Another thing need to pay attention is that when you build xserver, you need to disable glx. Rebuild the xserver... Oh well, that rules out testing by simply replacing distro drivers. One of the todo items is to fully support glx including direct and indirect . The major problem is that Xserver's glx code has the same glapi symbols which conflicts with standard mesa's glapi's implementations. It's easy to rename the xserver side glapi's symbol to other names to avoid this conflicts, but that will break indirect GLX in xserver side. I still don't have a perfect solution to solve this problem. Do you or anyone in this list have any suggestion to solve this confliction? I'm having a lot of fun with building glamor as it is missing or including headers in the wrong order and deciding that XID is 8 bytes when the server was compiled with a 4 byte XID. Fun. Will discuss these problem with you through IRC. And the usual problems with incomplete framebuffers, but hopefully that is just the glx confusion. That must be caused by glapi symbol confliction. Thanks. - Zhigang -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:04:35 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: This patchset initially enable glamor with UXA. And two functions ,fill_spans and poly_fill_rects, go to the glamor path. I tested it with render check, and it works fine. I split your patches slightly differently and pushed them. I could only verify that it didn't impact UXA without the glamor_egl module available. Do you have a patch for testing? -Chrid -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
-Original Message- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:14 AM To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework. On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:04:35 +0800, Zhigang Gong zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: This patchset initially enable glamor with UXA. And two functions ,fill_spans and poly_fill_rects, go to the glamor path. I tested it with render check, and it works fine. I split your patches slightly differently and pushed them. I just checked out the master branch, and have a simple test, everything seems ok. Thanks. I could only verify that it didn't impact UXA without the glamor_egl module available. Do you have a patch for testing? Now glamor was extracted from the xorg and be a separate library. Please checkout glamor at : git://people.freedesktop.org/~gongzg/glamor. This library implements two modules glamor and glamor_egl which are required for intel video driver to enable glamor. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce Glamor to UXA framework.
After discussion with Chris yesterday, I reworked the previous glamor branch and concentrate the patchset to two patches. The first patch is the same as the previous. The second patch merges all the others into one, and made some slightly change. One major change is that I decide to extent the finish_access to handle the flushing operations by check the access type. And also add some missed glamor flushing operations. This patchset initially enable glamor with UXA. And two functions ,fill_spans and poly_fill_rects, go to the glamor path. I tested it with render check, and it works fine. One of the remaining issues is the vsync'ed copy. I discussed with Chris, and already got a solution. Will do that when I enable the copy_area to glamor path. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
