2013/10/9 ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
I want to convert hsw_find_best_result() to use intel_pipe_wm, so we
need to move the merging to happen outside hsw_compute_wm_results().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 7eea69d..c2d439f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2716,26 +2716,23 @@ static void ilk_wm_merge(struct drm_device *dev,
}
static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
- const struct hsw_wm_maximums *lp_maximums,
+ const struct intel_pipe_wm *merged,
struct hsw_wm_values *results)
{
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
int level, wm_lp;
- struct intel_pipe_wm merged = {};
-
- ilk_wm_merge(dev, lp_maximums, merged);
memset(results, 0, sizeof(*results));
- results-enable_fbc_wm = merged.fbc_wm_enabled;
+ results-enable_fbc_wm = merged-fbc_wm_enabled;
/* LP1+ register values */
for (wm_lp = 1; wm_lp = 3; wm_lp++) {
const struct intel_wm_level *r;
- level = wm_lp + (wm_lp = 2 merged.wm[4].enable);
+ level = wm_lp + (wm_lp = 2 merged-wm[4].enable);
- r = merged.wm[level];
+ r = merged-wm[level];
if (!r-enable)
break;
@@ -2897,6 +2894,7 @@ static void haswell_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
struct hsw_wm_values results_1_2, results_5_6, *best_results;
enum intel_ddb_partitioning partitioning;
struct intel_pipe_wm pipe_wm = {};
+ struct intel_pipe_wm lp_wm_1_2 = {}, lp_wm_5_6 = {};
hsw_compute_wm_parameters(crtc, params, lp_max_1_2, lp_max_5_6);
@@ -2907,9 +2905,12 @@ static void haswell_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
intel_crtc-wm.active = pipe_wm;
- hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, lp_max_1_2, results_1_2);
+ ilk_wm_merge(dev, lp_max_1_2, lp_wm_1_2);
+ ilk_wm_merge(dev, lp_max_5_6, lp_wm_5_6);
Shouldn't you move the 5_6 ilk_wm_merge to inside the if statement,
because it's only needed there?
With or without that: Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
+
+ hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, lp_wm_1_2, results_1_2);
if (lp_max_1_2.pri != lp_max_5_6.pri) {
- hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, lp_max_5_6, results_5_6);
+ hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, lp_wm_5_6, results_5_6);
best_results = hsw_find_best_result(results_1_2,
results_5_6);
} else {
best_results = results_1_2;
--
1.8.1.5
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Paulo Zanoni
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx