Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm: Shrink mode->private_flags

2020-02-24 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä 
> > 
> > gma500 needs 4 bits (to store a pixel multiplier) in the
> > mode->private_flags, i915 currently has three bits defined.
> > No one else uses this. Reduce the size to u8.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä 
> 
> There seems to be talk about dropping use of private_flags
> from i915 and gma500 (IIRC).
> So maybe drop this patch as we are about to get rid of
> private_flags - which is much better?

Hmm. Yeah, this is patch 11/12 so I guess I might as well drop
it.

> 
>   Sam
> 
> > ---
> >  include/drm/drm_modes.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > index b585074945b5..dadb0f3e5b0b 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> > @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode {
> >  * by atomic drivers since they can store any additional data by
> >  * subclassing state structures.
> >  */
> > -   int private_flags;
> > +   u8 private_flags;
> >  
> > /**
> >  * @picture_aspect_ratio:
> > -- 
> > 2.24.1
> > 
> > ___
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm: Shrink mode->private_flags

2020-02-21 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä 
> 
> gma500 needs 4 bits (to store a pixel multiplier) in the
> mode->private_flags, i915 currently has three bits defined.
> No one else uses this. Reduce the size to u8.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä 

There seems to be talk about dropping use of private_flags
from i915 and gma500 (IIRC).
So maybe drop this patch as we are about to get rid of
private_flags - which is much better?

Sam

> ---
>  include/drm/drm_modes.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> index b585074945b5..dadb0f3e5b0b 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode {
>* by atomic drivers since they can store any additional data by
>* subclassing state structures.
>*/
> - int private_flags;
> + u8 private_flags;
>  
>   /**
>* @picture_aspect_ratio:
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm: Shrink mode->private_flags

2020-02-19 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä 

gma500 needs 4 bits (to store a pixel multiplier) in the
mode->private_flags, i915 currently has three bits defined.
No one else uses this. Reduce the size to u8.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä 
---
 include/drm/drm_modes.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
index b585074945b5..dadb0f3e5b0b 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct drm_display_mode {
 * by atomic drivers since they can store any additional data by
 * subclassing state structures.
 */
-   int private_flags;
+   u8 private_flags;
 
/**
 * @picture_aspect_ratio:
-- 
2.24.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx