On su, 2016-08-07 at 15:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> It's an outright programming error, so explode if it is ever hit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index c6f523e2879c..0092f5e90cb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -463,18 +463,12 @@ static void i915_gem_mark_busy(const struct
> intel_engine_cs *engine)
> */
> void __i915_add_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, bool
> flush_caches)
> {
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> - struct intel_ring *ring;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> + struct intel_ring *ring = request->ring;
> u32 request_start;
> u32 reserved_tail;
> int ret;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!request))
> - return;
> -
> - engine = request->engine;
> - ring = request->ring;
> -
> /*
> * To ensure that this call will not fail, space for its emissions
> * should already have been reserved in the ring buffer. Let the ring
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx