Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm: Check plane src coordinates correctly during page flip for atomic drivers
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 05:40:59PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 16/10/15 17:27, Matt Roper wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > >wrote: > >>From: Ville Syrjälä> >> > >>Instead of relying on the old crtc-{x,y,mode} gunk, dig out the primary > >>plane coordinates from the plane state when checking them against the > >>new framebuffer during page flip. > >> > >>Cc: Matt Roper > >>Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > >>Cc: Daniel Vetter > >>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > > > >For the series: > > > >Reviewed-by: Matt Roper Pulled all 5 into drm-misc, thanks. > >I also confirmed that the i-g-t test I wrote here: > >http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077394.html > >now passes with your patch series, so I believe Tvrtko's original bug > >report should be fixed. > > Oh I did not realize this series is about this, perhaps because I did not > see 1/5 which maybe had some more obvious clues. :) > > Great, that means if we decide to merge "drm/i915: Consider plane rotation > when calculating stride in skl_do_mmio_flip" and "kms_rotation_crc: Exercise > page flips with 90 degree rotation" we would have working rotated legacy > page flip with a test case. Matt, can you please push these igt patches and double-check that we have subtests to catch the viewport confusion here? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm: Check plane src coordinates correctly during page flip for atomic drivers
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:17:31PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 05:40:59PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 16/10/15 17:27, Matt Roper wrote: > > >On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > >wrote: > > >>From: Ville Syrjälä> > >> > > >>Instead of relying on the old crtc-{x,y,mode} gunk, dig out the primary > > >>plane coordinates from the plane state when checking them against the > > >>new framebuffer during page flip. > > >> > > >>Cc: Matt Roper > > >>Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > > >>Cc: Daniel Vetter > > >>Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > >For the series: > > > > > >Reviewed-by: Matt Roper > > Pulled all 5 into drm-misc, thanks. > > > >I also confirmed that the i-g-t test I wrote here: > > > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077394.html > > >now passes with your patch series, so I believe Tvrtko's original bug > > >report should be fixed. > > > > Oh I did not realize this series is about this, perhaps because I did not > > see 1/5 which maybe had some more obvious clues. :) > > > > Great, that means if we decide to merge "drm/i915: Consider plane rotation > > when calculating stride in skl_do_mmio_flip" and "kms_rotation_crc: Exercise > > page flips with 90 degree rotation" we would have working rotated legacy > > page flip with a test case. > > Matt, can you please push these igt patches and double-check that we have > subtests to catch the viewport confusion here? > > Thanks, Daniel Looks like Thomas already beat me to pushing the relevant i-g-t patches (both the one I wrote and the one Tvrtko wrote), so I think we're covered there. Thanks. Matt > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Matt Roper Graphics Software Engineer IoTG Platform Enabling & Development Intel Corporation (916) 356-2795 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm: Check plane src coordinates correctly during page flip for atomic drivers
On 16/10/15 17:27, Matt Roper wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: From: Ville SyrjäläInstead of relying on the old crtc-{x,y,mode} gunk, dig out the primary plane coordinates from the plane state when checking them against the new framebuffer during page flip. Cc: Matt Roper Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä For the series: Reviewed-by: Matt Roper I also confirmed that the i-g-t test I wrote here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077394.html now passes with your patch series, so I believe Tvrtko's original bug report should be fixed. Oh I did not realize this series is about this, perhaps because I did not see 1/5 which maybe had some more obvious clues. :) Great, that means if we decide to merge "drm/i915: Consider plane rotation when calculating stride in skl_do_mmio_flip" and "kms_rotation_crc: Exercise page flips with 90 degree rotation" we would have working rotated legacy page flip with a test case. Regards, Tvrtko ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx