Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 1/4] igt/gem_busy: Remove repeated use of igt_spin_batch_new

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 06:09:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> igt_spin_batch_new() includes a throttling check that GEM works, which
> breaks trying to create multiple spin batches, use
> __igt_spin_batch_new() instead, after verifying GEM works.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler 

on the whole series and pushed
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 1/4] igt/gem_busy: Remove repeated use of igt_spin_batch_new

[Chris Wilson]

igt_spin_batch_new() includes a throttling check that GEM works, which
breaks trying to create multiple spin batches, use
__igt_spin_batch_new() instead, after verifying GEM works.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
---
 tests/gem_busy.c | 10 +-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_busy.c b/tests/gem_busy.c
index 4ba232411..c349c2919 100644
--- a/tests/gem_busy.c
+++ b/tests/gem_busy.c
@@ -459,17 +459,17 @@ static void close_race(int fd)
igt_assert(sched_setscheduler(getpid(), SCHED_RR, ) == 0);
 
for (i = 0; i < nhandles; i++) {
-   spin[i] = igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0,
-engines[rand() % nengine], 
0);
+   spin[i] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0,
+  engines[rand() % 
nengine], 0);
handles[i] = spin[i]->handle;
}
 
igt_until_timeout(20) {
for (i = 0; i < nhandles; i++) {
igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[i]);
-   spin[i] = igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0,
-engines[rand() % 
nengine],
-0);
+   spin[i] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0,
+  engines[rand() % 
nengine],
+  0);
handles[i] = spin[i]->handle;
__sync_synchronize();
}
-- 
2.15.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx