Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gem: Use list_entry to access list members

2021-06-01 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2021.05.23 10:23:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Use list_entry() instead of container_of() to access list members.
> Also drop unnecessary and misleading NULL checks on the result of
> list_entry().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck 
> ---
> v2: Checkpatch fixes:
> - Fix alignment
> - Replace comparison against NULL with !
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c | 18 +-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> index d4f883f35b95..e3f488681484 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static void dmabuf_gem_object_free(struct kref *kref)
>  
>   if (vgpu && vgpu->active && !list_empty(>dmabuf_obj_list_head)) {
>   list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
> - dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos,
> - struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, list);
> + dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct 
> intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, list);
>   if (dmabuf_obj == obj) {
>   list_del(pos);
>   intel_gvt_hypervisor_put_vfio_device(vgpu);
> @@ -357,10 +356,8 @@ pick_dmabuf_by_info(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
>   struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *ret = NULL;
>  
>   list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
> - dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
> - list);
> - if ((dmabuf_obj == NULL) ||
> - (dmabuf_obj->info == NULL))
> + dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
> list);
> + if (!dmabuf_obj->info)
>   continue;
>  
>   fb_info = (struct intel_vgpu_fb_info *)dmabuf_obj->info;
> @@ -387,11 +384,7 @@ pick_dmabuf_by_num(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u32 id)
>   struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *ret = NULL;
>  
>   list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
> - dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
> - list);
> - if (!dmabuf_obj)
> - continue;
> -
> + dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
> list);
>   if (dmabuf_obj->dmabuf_id == id) {
>   ret = dmabuf_obj;
>   break;
> @@ -600,8 +593,7 @@ void intel_vgpu_dmabuf_cleanup(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>  
>   mutex_lock(>dmabuf_lock);
>   list_for_each_safe(pos, n, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
> - dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
> - list);
> + dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
> list);
>   dmabuf_obj->vgpu = NULL;
>  
>   idr_remove(>object_idr, dmabuf_obj->dmabuf_id);
> -- 

Sorry for late reply! Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gem: Use list_entry to access list members

2021-05-23 Thread Guenter Roeck
Use list_entry() instead of container_of() to access list members.
Also drop unnecessary and misleading NULL checks on the result of
list_entry().

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck 
---
v2: Checkpatch fixes:
- Fix alignment
- Replace comparison against NULL with !

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c | 18 +-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
index d4f883f35b95..e3f488681484 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.c
@@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static void dmabuf_gem_object_free(struct kref *kref)
 
if (vgpu && vgpu->active && !list_empty(>dmabuf_obj_list_head)) {
list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
-   dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos,
-   struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, list);
+   dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct 
intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, list);
if (dmabuf_obj == obj) {
list_del(pos);
intel_gvt_hypervisor_put_vfio_device(vgpu);
@@ -357,10 +356,8 @@ pick_dmabuf_by_info(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *ret = NULL;
 
list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
-   dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
-   list);
-   if ((dmabuf_obj == NULL) ||
-   (dmabuf_obj->info == NULL))
+   dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
list);
+   if (!dmabuf_obj->info)
continue;
 
fb_info = (struct intel_vgpu_fb_info *)dmabuf_obj->info;
@@ -387,11 +384,7 @@ pick_dmabuf_by_num(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, u32 id)
struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj *ret = NULL;
 
list_for_each(pos, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
-   dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
-   list);
-   if (!dmabuf_obj)
-   continue;
-
+   dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
list);
if (dmabuf_obj->dmabuf_id == id) {
ret = dmabuf_obj;
break;
@@ -600,8 +593,7 @@ void intel_vgpu_dmabuf_cleanup(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
 
mutex_lock(>dmabuf_lock);
list_for_each_safe(pos, n, >dmabuf_obj_list_head) {
-   dmabuf_obj = container_of(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj,
-   list);
+   dmabuf_obj = list_entry(pos, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj, 
list);
dmabuf_obj->vgpu = NULL;
 
idr_remove(>object_idr, dmabuf_obj->dmabuf_id);
-- 
2.25.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx