Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
Joe, (It would have been nice to get the content that failes instead of having to pull the tree) Good suggestion! I'll attach the git-format-patch result in the checkpatch.pl reports in future. Thanks, Fengguang ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com wrote: Hi Konstantin, FYI, there are new warnings show up in tree: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes head: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2 scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]' #41: cc: stable.] Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc: stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch maintainer. -Daniel --- 0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Center http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com wrote: FYI, there are new warnings show up in tree: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes head: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2 scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]' #41: cc: stable.] Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc: stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch maintainer. -Daniel (It would have been nice to get the content that failes instead of having to pull the tree) Don't wrap text to start a line with cc: Cc: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.] Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org (Note: tiny conflict due to the addition of You could have added something like: [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.] ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
