Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity

2020-12-15 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 20:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
> working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.
> 
> The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user
> space,
> but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the
> effective set,
> which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really
> tell
> about the actual target CPUs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
> Cc: Saeed Mahameed 
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky 
> Cc: "David S. Miller" 
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
> 

Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed 

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity

2020-12-14 Thread Tariq Toukan




On 12/10/2020 9:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.

The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space,
but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set,
which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell
about the actual target CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Saeed Mahameed 
Cc: Leon Romanovsky 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c |2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channel(struct mlx
c->num_tc   = params->num_tc;
c->xdp  = !!params->xdp_prog;
c->stats= >channel_stats[ix].ch;
-   c->aff_mask = irq_get_affinity_mask(irq);
+   c->aff_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(irq);
c->lag_port = mlx5e_enumerate_lag_port(priv->mdev, ix);
  
  	netif_napi_add(netdev, >napi, mlx5e_napi_poll, 64);




Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan 

Thanks.
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity

2020-12-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Using the interrupt affinity mask for checking locality is not really
working well on architectures which support effective affinity masks.

The affinity mask is either the system wide default or set by user space,
but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the effective set,
which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really tell
about the actual target CPUs.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
Cc: Saeed Mahameed 
Cc: Leon Romanovsky 
Cc: "David S. Miller" 
Cc: Jakub Kicinski 
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channel(struct mlx
c->num_tc   = params->num_tc;
c->xdp  = !!params->xdp_prog;
c->stats= >channel_stats[ix].ch;
-   c->aff_mask = irq_get_affinity_mask(irq);
+   c->aff_mask = irq_get_effective_affinity_mask(irq);
c->lag_port = mlx5e_enumerate_lag_port(priv->mdev, ix);
 
netif_napi_add(netdev, >napi, mlx5e_napi_poll, 64);

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx