Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
On 10/20/2015 04:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:27:24PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote: On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum value till we get dynamic cdclk support. v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS programmed value v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); - else - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); + else { + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't happen anymore, right? Yeah right. Will remove. + else + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + } } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { broxton_init_cdclk(dev); broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); } +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; + + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) + goto sanitize; + + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock +* +* Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but +* decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not +* enable display. Verify the same as well. +*/ + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ + return false; +sanitize: + /* +* As of now initialize with max cdclk till +* we get dynamic cdclk support +* */ + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk' I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted. Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly. It gets called already earlier from intel_modeset_init(). Yeah, I misunderstood your comment earlier. In case there was no sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change the logic. + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); + + /* we did have to sanitize */ + return true; +} + /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev); void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_ini
Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:27:24PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote: > On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > >> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might > >> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum > >> value till we get dynamic cdclk support. > >> > >> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init > >> - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected > >> - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS > >>programmed value > >> > >> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) > >> > >> Cc: Imre Deak > >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä > >> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + > >> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > >> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > >> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) > >> > >>cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); > >>dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; > >> - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) > >> - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); > >> - else > >> - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); > >> + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) > >> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); > >> + else { > >> + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) > >> + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); > > > > Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't > > happen anymore, right? > > > > Yeah right. Will remove. > > >> + else > >> + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, > >> POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); > >> + } > >>} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { > >>broxton_init_cdclk(dev); > >>broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > >> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private > >> *dev_priv) > >>DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); > >> } > >> > >> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > >> +{ > >> + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); > >> + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > >> + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; > >> + > >> + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ > >> + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) > >> + goto sanitize; > >> + > >> + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock > >> + * > >> + * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but > >> + * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not > >> + * enable display. Verify the same as well. > >> + */ > >> + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) > >> + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ > >> + return false; > >> +sanitize: > >> + /* > >> + * As of now initialize with max cdclk till > >> + * we get dynamic cdclk support > >> + * */ > >> + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; > > > > Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk' > > > > I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets > > called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The > > whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put > > off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted. > > > > Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be > called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly. It gets called already earlier from intel_modeset_init(). > In case there was no > sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in > skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is > invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change > the logic. > > >> + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); > >> + > >> + /* we did have to sanitize */ > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ > >> static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) > >> { > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > >> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i91
Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum value till we get dynamic cdclk support. v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS programmed value v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); - else - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); + else { + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't happen anymore, right? Yeah right. Will remove. + else + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + } } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { broxton_init_cdclk(dev); broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); } +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; + + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) + goto sanitize; + + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock +* +* Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but +* decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not +* enable display. Verify the same as well. +*/ + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ + return false; +sanitize: + /* +* As of now initialize with max cdclk till +* we get dynamic cdclk support +* */ + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk' I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted. Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly. In case there was no sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change the logic. + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); + + /* we did have to sanitize */ + return true; +} + /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev); void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might > not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum > value till we get dynamic cdclk support. > > v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init > - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected > - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS > programmed value > > v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) > > Cc: Imre Deak > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) > > cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); > dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; > - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) > - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); > - else > - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); > + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); > + else { > + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) > + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't happen anymore, right? > + else > + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, > POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); > + } > } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { > broxton_init_cdclk(dev); > broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); > } > > +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > +{ > + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); > + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); > + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; > + > + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ > + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) > + goto sanitize; > + > + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock > + * > + * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but > + * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not > + * enable display. Verify the same as well. > + */ > + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) > + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ > + return false; > +sanitize: > + /* > + * As of now initialize with max cdclk till > + * we get dynamic cdclk support > + * */ > + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk' I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted. > + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); > + > + /* we did have to sanitize */ > + return true; > +} > + > /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ > static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) > { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev); > void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); > void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config); > -- > 2.4.3 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
On 10/16/2015 06:48 PM, Shobhit Kumar wrote: Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum value till we get dynamic cdclk support. v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS programmed value v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) Ville, does this come even close to what you had in mind ? Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); - else - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); + else { + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); + else + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + } } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { broxton_init_cdclk(dev); broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); } +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; + + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) + goto sanitize; + + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock +* +* Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but +* decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not +* enable display. Verify the same as well. +*/ + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ + return false; +sanitize: + /* +* As of now initialize with max cdclk till +* we get dynamic cdclk support +* */ + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); + + /* we did have to sanitize */ + return true; +} + /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev); void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config); ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum value till we get dynamic cdclk support. v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS programmed value v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville) Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Ville Syrjälä Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev) cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev); dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq; - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); - else - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv)) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n"); + else { + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE)) + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n"); + else + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS); + } } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { broxton_init_cdclk(dev); broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n"); } +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +{ + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL); + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL); + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk; + + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */ + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK))) + goto sanitize; + + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock +* +* Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but +* decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not +* enable display. Verify the same as well. +*/ + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq))) + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */ + return false; +sanitize: + /* +* As of now initialize with max cdclk till +* we get dynamic cdclk support +* */ + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000; + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv); + + /* we did have to sanitize */ + return true; +} + /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev); void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc, struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config); -- 2.4.3 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx