Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers (rev2)
On 21/10/13 09:36PM, Patchwork wrote: > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21333 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_21333, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/index.html > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_21333: > > ### CI changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * boot: > - fi-kbl-r: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-kbl-r/boot.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-kbl-r/boot.html Hi, by looking at the report (first link) it looks like this is an issue with a specific machine (where all tests failed). Considering this same patch set ran without problems before this last rebase, could this be a setup issue? Is there a way to request a re-trigger on that machine? Thanks.
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers (rev2)
== Series Details ==
Series: drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/95578/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10732 -> Patchwork_21333
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21333 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_21333, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/index.html
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_21333:
### CI changes ###
Possible regressions
* boot:
- fi-kbl-r: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-kbl-r/boot.html
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-kbl-r/boot.html
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21333 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-compute0:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +1 similar issue
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_...@sync-compute0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-busy@bcs0:
- fi-apl-guc: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109271]) +1 similar issue
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-apl-guc/igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-b...@bcs0.html
* igt@i915_hangman@error-state-basic:
- fi-apl-guc: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][5] ([i915#1610])
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_hang...@error-state-basic.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-snb-2600:[PASS][6] -> [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#3921])
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
* igt@kms_flip@basic-plain-flip@c-dp1:
- fi-cfl-8109u: [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#4165])
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_flip@basic-plain-f...@c-dp1.html
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_flip@basic-plain-f...@c-dp1.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b:
- fi-cfl-8109u: [PASS][10] -> [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#295]) +14
similar issues
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-apl-guc: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2426] / [i915#3363])
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-apl-guc/igt@run...@aborted.html
Possible fixes
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- {fi-hsw-gt1}: [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#3303]) -> [PASS][14]
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-hsw-gt1/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-hsw-gt1/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-crc-fast:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [FAIL][15] ([i915#1161]) -> [PASS][16]
[15]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10732/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamel...@hdmi-crc-fast.html
[16]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21333/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamel...@hdmi-crc-fast.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[i915#1161]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1161
[i915#1610]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1610
[i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
[i915#295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/295
[i915#3303]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3303
[i915#3363]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3363
[i915#3921]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3921
[i915#4165]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4165
Participating hosts (41 -> 38)
--
Additional (1): fi-apl-guc
Missing(4): fi-bsw-cyan fi-bwr-2160 fi-skl-6700k2 fi-hsw-4200u
Build changes
-
* Linux: CI_DRM_10732 -> Patchwork_21333
