Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/selftests: Flush the context worker
Quoting Patchwork (2019-12-30 16:53:38) > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/selftests: Flush the context > worker > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/71497/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7656 -> Patchwork_15947 > > > Summary > --- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15947 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_15947, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/index.html > > Possible new issues > --- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_15947: > > ### IGT changes ### > > Possible regressions > > * igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries: > - fi-cml-s: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] +21 similar issues >[1]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-cml-s/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html >[2]: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-cml-s/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html IPEHR: 0x5a5a5a5a Didn't clear enough... -Chris ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/selftests: Flush the context worker
== Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/6] drm/i915/selftests: Flush the context worker URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/71497/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7656 -> Patchwork_15947 Summary --- **FAILURE** Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_15947 absolutely need to be verified manually. If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes introduced in Patchwork_15947, please notify your bug team to allow them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/index.html Possible new issues --- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15947: ### IGT changes ### Possible regressions * igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries: - fi-cml-s: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] +21 similar issues [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-cml-s/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-cml-s/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html * igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default: - fi-icl-u2: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] +63 similar issues [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_ringf...@basic-default.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_ringf...@basic-default.html * igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked: - fi-tgl-y: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] +65 similar issues [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_ringf...@basic-default-forked.html * igt@gem_ringfill@basic-default-interruptible: - fi-icl-y: [PASS][6] -> [SKIP][7] +63 similar issues [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_ringf...@basic-default-interruptible.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-icl-y/igt@gem_ringf...@basic-default-interruptible.html * igt@gem_sync@basic-all: - fi-icl-guc: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] +63 similar issues [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-icl-guc/igt@gem_s...@basic-all.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-icl-guc/igt@gem_s...@basic-all.html * igt@gem_sync@basic-each: - fi-cml-u2: [PASS][10] -> [SKIP][11] +63 similar issues [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_s...@basic-each.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-cml-u2/igt@gem_s...@basic-each.html * igt@gem_wait@basic-busy-all: - fi-icl-u3: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] +63 similar issues [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_w...@basic-busy-all.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_w...@basic-busy-all.html * igt@i915_module_load@reload: - fi-kbl-8809g: [PASS][14] -> [DMESG-WARN][15] +1 similar issue [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-cml-u2: [PASS][16] -> [DMESG-WARN][17] +1 similar issue [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-cml-u2/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-cfl-8700k: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] +1 similar issue [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-cfl-8700k/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-apl-guc: [PASS][20] -> [DMESG-WARN][21] +1 similar issue [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-bxt-dsi: [PASS][22] -> [DMESG-WARN][23] +1 similar issue [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-bxt-dsi/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-whl-u: [PASS][24] -> [DMESG-WARN][25] +1 similar issue [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7656/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15947/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_module_l...@reload.html - fi-skl-6600u: [PASS][26] -> [DMESG-WARN][27] +1 similar issue [26]: