Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 05:10:28PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:39:41PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101367/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11365_full -> Patchwork_22574_full
> >
> >
> > Summary
> > ---
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22574_full absolutely need
> > to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_22574_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> > them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> > CI.
> >
> >
> >
> > Participating hosts (13 -> 13)
> > --
> >
> > No changes in participating hosts
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > ---
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_22574_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > Possible regressions
> >
> > * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
> > - shard-kbl: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
> >[1]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
> >[2]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
>
> <4> [222.484874] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b7c23: [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> <4> [222.484889] CPU: 3 PID: 1279 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Not tainted
> 5.17.0-rc8-CI-Patchwork_22574+ #1
> <4> [222.484899] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS
> BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017
> <4> [222.484906] RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x612/0x2940
>
> This implies a use-after-free mistake somewhere; it wouldn't be caused
> by the steering changes in this series.
>
> I see a similar stack trace and error on a different test/platform here:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5268 which might be
> caused by the same underlying bug.
Since this failure seems unrelated to this series, patches applied to
drm-intel-gt-next (with the one extra 'const' suggested by sparse
added). Thanks Jose and Lucas for the reviews.
Matt
>
>
> Matt
>
> >
> >
> > Suppressed
> >
> > The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> > They do not affect the overall result.
> >
> > * igt@gem_bad_reloc@negative-reloc-bltcopy:
> > - {shard-rkl}:[PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
> >[3]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
> >[4]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_ccs@block-copy-inplace:
> > - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5]
> >[5]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-12/igt@gem_...@block-copy-inplace.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-slice@vecs0:
> > - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
> >[6]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-15/igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-sl...@vecs0.html
> >
> >
> > Known issues
> >
> >
> > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22574_full that come from known
> > issues:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > Issues hit
> >
> > * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium:
> > - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#111827])
> >[7]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
> > - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [TIMEOUT][9] ([i915#3063] /
> > [i915#3648])
> >[8]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
> >[9]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
> > - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2846])
> >[10]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-skl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0:
> > - shard-tglb: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842])
> >[11]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
> >[12]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
> >
> > * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
> >
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:39:41PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101367/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11365_full -> Patchwork_22574_full
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22574_full absolutely need to
> be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_22574_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (13 -> 13)
> --
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_22574_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
> - shard-kbl: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
<4> [222.484874] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0x6b6b6b6b6b6b7c23: [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
<4> [222.484889] CPU: 3 PID: 1279 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Not tainted
5.17.0-rc8-CI-Patchwork_22574+ #1
<4> [222.484899] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS
BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017
<4> [222.484906] RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x612/0x2940
This implies a use-after-free mistake somewhere; it wouldn't be caused
by the steering changes in this series.
I see a similar stack trace and error on a different test/platform here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5268 which might be
caused by the same underlying bug.
Matt
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * igt@gem_bad_reloc@negative-reloc-bltcopy:
> - {shard-rkl}:[PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
>
> * igt@gem_ccs@block-copy-inplace:
> - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5]
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-12/igt@gem_...@block-copy-inplace.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-slice@vecs0:
> - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-15/igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-sl...@vecs0.html
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22574_full that come from known
> issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@feature_discovery@chamelium:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#111827])
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html
>
> * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [TIMEOUT][9] ([i915#3063] /
> [i915#3648])
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
> - shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2846])
>[10]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-skl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842])
>[11]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
>[12]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
> - shard-apl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
> issue
>[13]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html
>[14]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-apl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
> issue
>[15]:
>
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
== Series Details ==
Series: i915: General multicast steering updates (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101367/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11365_full -> Patchwork_22574_full
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22574_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_22574_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
Participating hosts (13 -> 13)
--
No changes in participating hosts
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_22574_full:
### IGT changes ###
Possible regressions
* igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_whis...@basic-fds-forked-all.html
Suppressed
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* igt@gem_bad_reloc@negative-reloc-bltcopy:
- {shard-rkl}:[PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_bad_re...@negative-reloc-bltcopy.html
* igt@gem_ccs@block-copy-inplace:
- {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5]
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-12/igt@gem_...@block-copy-inplace.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-slice@vecs0:
- {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][6]
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-dg1-15/igt@gem_exec_schedule@submit-early-sl...@vecs0.html
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22574_full that come from known
issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@feature_discovery@chamelium:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#111827])
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discov...@chamelium.html
* igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][8] -> [TIMEOUT][9] ([i915#3063] / [i915#3648])
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_...@unwedge-stress.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2846])
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-skl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842])
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
- shard-apl: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
issue
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-apl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
issue
[15]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
[16]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#2842])
[17]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html
[18]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#2851])
[19]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11365/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html
[20]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22574/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs1.html
* igt@gem_exec_params@secure-non-root:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([fdo#112283])
[21]:
