Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)

2022-02-25 Thread Sarvela, Tomi P 
> From: Saarinen, Jani 
> > From: Navare, Manasi D 
> > Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR
> capable
> > property on a long hpd (rev4)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I fixed the regression in this patch and resent it, it still has BAT 
> > failures, I
> wanted
> > to understand if it failed to boot some of the machines again or the errors
> flagged
> > here are the known errors.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Manasi
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Patchwork 
> > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:45 AM
> > To: Navare, Manasi D 
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable
> property
> > on a long hpd (rev4)
> >
> >
> >
> > Patch Details
> >
> > Series:
> >
> > drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)
> >
> > URL:
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98801/
> >
> > State:
> >
> > failure
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html
> >
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394
> >
> >
> > Summary
> >
> >
> > FAILURE
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22394 absolutely need
> to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_22394, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to
> > document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> > tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html
> >
> >
> > Participating hosts (43 -> 32)
> >
> >
> > Missing (11): fi-kbl-soraka fi-cml-u2 fi-bsw-cyan fi-ilk-650 fi-apl-guc 
> > fi-kbl-
> 7500u fi-
> > kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-bsw-kefka fi-bdw-samus fi-skl-6600u
> Would be good to understand why there is this many systems down still. Also
> are these same than on previous series...
> Previous was missing:
> --
> Missing (29): fi-kbl-soraka fi-bdw-gvtdvm fi-apl-guc fi-snb-2520m fi-skl-6600u
> fi-snb-2600 fi-cml-u2 fi-bxt-dsi fi-bdw-5557u shard-tglu fi-bsw-n3050 
> fi-glk-dsi
> fi-ilk-650 fi-kbl-7500u fi-hsw-4770 fi-ivb-3770 fi-elk-e7500 fi-bsw-nick 
> fi-skl-
> 6700k2 fi-kbl-7567u fi-skl-guc fi-cfl-8700k fi-bsw-cyan fi-cfl-guc fi-kbl-guc 
> fi-
> kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-kbl-8809g fi-bsw-kefka
> --
> So there are same systems. Tomi, what is threshold how many systems need
> to have boot issues and having
> Just looking some same systems on both...:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/filelist.html
> eg. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-
> soraka/run0.txt
> and https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-
> 7500u/run0.txt , there is also oops https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-7500u/pstore0-1645726566_Oops_1.txt
> I would say not clean really yet

The threshold is 50% of hosts. Couple of those now missing are problem
children, but there's also some that should not be down.

Please re-test the series, and if the result looks the same, then there
is probably real issue with the patch.

Tomi


> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Possible new issues
> >
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_22394:
> >
> >
> > IGT changes
> >
> >
> > Possible regressions
> >
> >
> > *   igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
> >
> > *   fi-skl-6700k2: PASS  ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> > tip/CI_DRM_11279/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-
> > s...@smem.html>  -> DMESG-WARN  > tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-
> > s...@smem.html>
> >
> >
> > Known issues
> >
> >
> > Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22394 that come from known
> issues:
> >
> >
> > IGT changes
> >
> >
> > Issues hit
> >
> >
> > *   igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@cs-multi-fence:
> >
> > *   fi-blb-e6850: NOTRUN -> SKIP  > ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-blb-
> > e6850/igt@amdgpu/amd_ba...@cs-multi-fence.html>  (fdo#109271
> >  ) +17 similar
> issues
> >
> > *   igt@runner@aborted:
> >
> > *   fi-skl-6700k2: NOTRUN -> FAIL  gfx-
> > ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-
> > 6700k2/igt@run...@aborted.html>  (i915#4312
> >  )
> >
> >
> > Possible fixes
> >
> >
> > *   igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
> >
> > *   bat-dg1-6: DMESG-FAIL  ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> > tip/CI_DRM_11279/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html>
> > (i915#4494   /
> i915#4957
> >  ) -> PASS
>  > gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/bat-dg1-
> > 6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html>
> >
> > *   igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)

2022-02-24 Thread Saarinen, Jani 
Hi, 
> -Original Message-
> From: Navare, Manasi D 
> Sent: torstai 24. helmikuuta 2022 21.00
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Sarvela, Tomi P ; Syrjala, Ville
> ; Saarinen, Jani ; Nikula, 
> Jani
> 
> Subject: RE: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable
> property on a long hpd (rev4)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I fixed the regression in this patch and resent it, it still has BAT 
> failures, I wanted
> to understand if it failed to boot some of the machines again or the errors 
> flagged
> here are the known errors.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Manasi
> 
> 
> 
> From: Patchwork 
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:45 AM
> To: Navare, Manasi D 
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable 
> property
> on a long hpd (rev4)
> 
> 
> 
> Patch Details
> 
> Series:
> 
> drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)
> 
> URL:
> 
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98801/
> 
> State:
> 
> failure
> 
> Details:
> 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html
> 
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394
> 
> 
> Summary
> 
> 
> FAILURE
> 
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22394 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
> 
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_22394, please notify your bug team to allow them to
> document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html
> 
> 
> Participating hosts (43 -> 32)
> 
> 
> Missing (11): fi-kbl-soraka fi-cml-u2 fi-bsw-cyan fi-ilk-650 fi-apl-guc 
> fi-kbl-7500u fi-
> kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-bsw-kefka fi-bdw-samus fi-skl-6600u
Would be good to understand why there is this many systems down still. Also are 
these same than on previous series...
Previous was missing:
--
Missing (29): fi-kbl-soraka fi-bdw-gvtdvm fi-apl-guc fi-snb-2520m fi-skl-6600u 
fi-snb-2600 fi-cml-u2 fi-bxt-dsi fi-bdw-5557u shard-tglu fi-bsw-n3050 
fi-glk-dsi fi-ilk-650 fi-kbl-7500u fi-hsw-4770 fi-ivb-3770 fi-elk-e7500 
fi-bsw-nick fi-skl-6700k2 fi-kbl-7567u fi-skl-guc fi-cfl-8700k fi-bsw-cyan 
fi-cfl-guc fi-kbl-guc fi-kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-kbl-8809g fi-bsw-kefka
--
So there are same systems. Tomi, what is threshold how many systems need to 
have boot issues and having 
Just looking some same systems on both...:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/filelist.html 
eg. 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-soraka/run0.txt 
and 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-7500u/run0.txt 
, there is also oops 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-kbl-7500u/pstore0-1645726566_Oops_1.txt
 
I would say not clean really yet


> 
> 
> Possible new issues
> 
> 
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_22394:
> 
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> 
> Possible regressions
> 
> 
> * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
> 
>   *   fi-skl-6700k2: PASS  tip/CI_DRM_11279/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-
> s...@smem.html>  -> DMESG-WARN  tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-
> s...@smem.html>
> 
> 
> Known issues
> 
> 
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22394 that come from known issues:
> 
> 
> IGT changes
> 
> 
> Issues hit
> 
> 
> * igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@cs-multi-fence:
> 
>   *   fi-blb-e6850: NOTRUN -> SKIP  ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-blb-
> e6850/igt@amdgpu/amd_ba...@cs-multi-fence.html>  (fdo#109271
>  ) +17 similar issues
> 
> * igt@runner@aborted:
> 
>   *   fi-skl-6700k2: NOTRUN -> FAIL  ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-
> 6700k2/igt@run...@aborted.html>  (i915#4312
>  )
> 
> 
> Possible fixes
> 
> 
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
> 
>   *   bat-dg1-6: DMESG-FAIL  tip/CI_DRM_11279/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html>
> (i915#4494   / i915#4957
>  ) -> PASS 
>  gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/bat-dg1-
> 6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html>
> 
> * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
> 
>   *   fi-blb-e6850: DMESG-FAIL  tip/CI_DRM_11279/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html>
> (i915#5026  ) -> PASS
>  e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)

2022-02-24 Thread Navare, Manasi D 
Hi,

I fixed the regression in this patch and resent it, it still has BAT failures, 
I wanted to understand if it failed to boot some of the machines again or the 
errors flagged here are the known errors.

Regards
Manasi

From: Patchwork 
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:45 AM
To: Navare, Manasi D 
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable 
property on a long hpd (rev4)

Patch Details
Series:

drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)

URL:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98801/

State:

failure

Details:

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394
Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22394 absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_22394, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html

Participating hosts (43 -> 32)

Missing (11): fi-kbl-soraka fi-cml-u2 fi-bsw-cyan fi-ilk-650 fi-apl-guc 
fi-kbl-7500u fi-kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-bsw-kefka fi-bdw-samus fi-skl-6600u

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22394:

IGT changes
Possible regressions

  *   igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
 *   fi-skl-6700k2: 
PASS
 -> 
DMESG-WARN

Known issues

Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22394 that come from known issues:

IGT changes
Issues hit

  *   igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@cs-multi-fence:
 *   fi-blb-e6850: NOTRUN -> 
SKIP
 (fdo#109271) +17 similar 
issues
  *   igt@runner@aborted:
 *   fi-skl-6700k2: NOTRUN -> 
FAIL
 (i915#4312)

Possible fixes

  *   igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
 *   bat-dg1-6: 
DMESG-FAIL
 (i915#4494 / 
i915#4957) -> 
PASS
  *   igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
 *   fi-blb-e6850: 
DMESG-FAIL
 (i915#5026) -> 
PASS
  *   igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
 *   {bat-adlp-6}: 
DMESG-WARN
 (i915#5068) -> 
PASS
  *   igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset@a-edp1:
 *   {bat-adlp-6}: 
DMESG-WARN
 (i915#3576) -> 
PASS

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

Build changes

  *   Linux: CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394

CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_11279: 5301cc85b3cc0eaa37405a117c77a35db7f4a76d @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_6356: b403d8e73c6888561eaec97835688313b0763ce9 @ 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_22394: 244f36e5190c176be3ec2fbc9fc18c63b8383621 @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux

== Linux commits ==

244f36e5190c drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)

2022-02-24 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd (rev4)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98801/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22394 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_22394, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html

Participating hosts (43 -> 32)
--

  Missing(11): fi-kbl-soraka fi-cml-u2 fi-bsw-cyan fi-ilk-650 fi-apl-guc 
fi-kbl-7500u fi-kbl-x1275 fi-cfl-8109u fi-bsw-kefka fi-bdw-samus fi-skl-6600u 

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22394:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
- fi-skl-6700k2:  [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22394 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@cs-multi-fence:
- fi-blb-e6850:   NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-blb-e6850/igt@amdgpu/amd_ba...@cs-multi-fence.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-skl-6700k2:  NOTRUN -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#4312])
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@run...@aborted.html

  
 Possible fixes 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- bat-dg1-6:  [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957]) -> 
[PASS][6]
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@hangcheck.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- fi-blb-e6850:   [DMESG-FAIL][7] ([i915#5026]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@workarounds:
- {bat-adlp-6}:   [DMESG-WARN][9] ([i915#5068]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/bat-adlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@workarounds.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/bat-adlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@l...@workarounds.html

  * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset@a-edp1:
- {bat-adlp-6}:   [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#3576]) -> [PASS][12]
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11279/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-mode...@a-edp1.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-mode...@a-edp1.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
  the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#3576]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3576
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494
  [i915#4898]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4898
  [i915#4957]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4957
  [i915#5026]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5026
  [i915#5068]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5068


Build changes
-

  * Linux: CI_DRM_11279 -> Patchwork_22394

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_11279: 5301cc85b3cc0eaa37405a117c77a35db7f4a76d @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6356: b403d8e73c6888561eaec97835688313b0763ce9 @ 
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_22394: 244f36e5190c176be3ec2fbc9fc18c63b8383621 @ 
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

244f36e5190c drm/i915/display/vrr: Reset VRR capable property on a long hpd

== Logs ==

For more details see: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22394/index.html