Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall

2019-10-17 Thread Matt Roper 
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:03:20AM -0700, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Intel-gfx  On Behalf Of Matt 
> > Roper
> > Sent: torstai 17. lokakuuta 2019 18.47
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH 
> > type in irq
> > postinstall
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:35:20AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68116/
> > > State : failure
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7114 -> Patchwork_14843
> > > 
> > >
> > > Summary
> > > ---
> > >
> > >   **FAILURE**
> > >
> > >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14843 absolutely need to 
> > > be
> > >   verified manually.
> > >
> > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > >   introduced in Patchwork_14843, please notify your bug team to allow them
> > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in 
> > > CI.
> > >
> > >   External URL:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/index.html
> > >
> > > Possible new issues
> > > ---
> > >
> > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_14843:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > >  Possible regressions 
> > >
> > >   * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
> > > - fi-icl-u2:  [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
> > >[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> > u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> > >[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-
> > u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> > > - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
> > >[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> > u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> > >[4]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt
> > > @i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> > 
> > These appear to be a GPU hang and "i915/intel_execlists_live_selftests:
> > live_timeslice_preempt failed with error -5;" not related to the PCH fix in 
> > this patch.
> 
> These are seen lately on many series, don’t we have bug about these? 

It matches the title of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111872 which is already
resolved, but I don't have enough GEM insight to know if it's truly the
same root cause or not?

> > 
> > >
> > >   * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> > > - fi-cfl-8109u:   [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
> > >[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-
> > 8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> > >[6]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-8109u/
> > > igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> > 
> > 
> > This is some kind of a timeout during a GEM selftest
> > ("i915/i915_gem_context_live_selftests: live_parallel_switch failed with 
> > error -62").
> > Errno -62 is -ETIME.  Also not related to this patch.
> Same this too. 
> 

I don't see anything obvious in the bug list that matches this one.


Matt

> 
> > 
> > Will poke CI for a retest.
> > 
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > Known issues
> > > 
> > >
> > >   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14843 that come from known 
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > >  Issues hit 
> > >
> > >   * igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-after-default:
> > > - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([fdo#107724]) +2 
> > > similar issues
> > >[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> > u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
> > >[8]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt
> > > @prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
> > >
> > >
> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall

2019-10-17 Thread Saarinen, Jani 


> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx  On Behalf Of Matt 
> Roper
> Sent: torstai 17. lokakuuta 2019 18.47
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH 
> type in irq
> postinstall
> 
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:35:20AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68116/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7114 -> Patchwork_14843
> > 
> >
> > Summary
> > ---
> >
> >   **FAILURE**
> >
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14843 absolutely need to be
> >   verified manually.
> >
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_14843, please notify your bug team to allow them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in 
> > CI.
> >
> >   External URL:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/index.html
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > ---
> >
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_14843:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> >  Possible regressions 
> >
> >   * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
> > - fi-icl-u2:  [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
> >[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> >[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-
> u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> > - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
> >[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> >[4]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt
> > @i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> 
> These appear to be a GPU hang and "i915/intel_execlists_live_selftests:
> live_timeslice_preempt failed with error -5;" not related to the PCH fix in 
> this patch.

These are seen lately on many series, don’t we have bug about these? 
> 
> >
> >   * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> > - fi-cfl-8109u:   [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
> >[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-
> 8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> >[6]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-8109u/
> > igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
> 
> 
> This is some kind of a timeout during a GEM selftest
> ("i915/i915_gem_context_live_selftests: live_parallel_switch failed with 
> error -62").
> Errno -62 is -ETIME.  Also not related to this patch.
Same this too. 


> 
> Will poke CI for a retest.
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Known issues
> > 
> >
> >   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14843 that come from known issues:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> >  Issues hit 
> >
> >   * igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-after-default:
> > - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([fdo#107724]) +2 
> > similar issues
> >[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
> >[8]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt
> > @prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
> >
> >
> >  Possible fixes 
> >
> >   * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> > - fi-bdw-gvtdvm:  [DMESG-WARN][9] -> [PASS][10]
> >[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-bdw-
> gvtdvm/igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html
> >[10]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-bdw-gvtdvm
> > /igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html
> >
> >   * igt@gem_flink_basic@double-flink:
> > - fi-icl-u3:  [DMESG-WARN][11] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][12] +2 
> > similar
> issues
> >[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-
> u3/igt@gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html
> >[12]:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt
> > @gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html
> >
> >   * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall

2019-10-17 Thread Matt Roper 
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:35:20AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68116/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7114 -> Patchwork_14843
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14843 absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_14843, please notify your bug team to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/index.html
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> Patchwork_14843:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
> - fi-icl-u2:  [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
>[1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
>[2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
>[3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
>[4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

These appear to be a GPU hang and "i915/intel_execlists_live_selftests:
live_timeslice_preempt failed with error -5;" not related to the PCH
fix in this patch.

> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
> - fi-cfl-8109u:   [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
>[5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
>[6]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html


This is some kind of a timeout during a GEM selftest
("i915/i915_gem_context_live_selftests: live_parallel_switch failed with
error -62").  Errno -62 is -ETIME.  Also not related to this patch.

Will poke CI for a retest.


Matt


> 
>   
> Known issues
> 
> 
>   Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14843 that come from known issues:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Issues hit 
> 
>   * igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-after-default:
> - fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([fdo#107724]) +2 
> similar issues
>[7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
>[8]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
> 
>   
>  Possible fixes 
> 
>   * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
> - fi-bdw-gvtdvm:  [DMESG-WARN][9] -> [PASS][10]
>[9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html
>[10]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html
> 
>   * igt@gem_flink_basic@double-flink:
> - fi-icl-u3:  [DMESG-WARN][11] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][12] +2 
> similar issues
>[11]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html
>[12]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
> - fi-cfl-guc: [DMESG-FAIL][13] -> [PASS][14]
>[13]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
>[14]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> - fi-cml-u:   [DMESG-FAIL][15] -> [PASS][16]
>[15]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cml-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
>[16]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cml-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> - fi-whl-u:   [INCOMPLETE][17] -> [PASS][18]
>[17]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
>[18]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
> 
>   * igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
> - {fi-icl-guc}:   [INCOMPLETE][19] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][20]
>[19]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
>[20]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
> - {fi-tg

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall

2019-10-16 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Correct the PCH type in irq postinstall
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68116/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7114 -> Patchwork_14843


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14843 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_14843, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/index.html

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14843:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
- fi-icl-u2:  [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
- fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
- fi-cfl-8109u:   [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-FAIL][6]
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14843 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-after-default:
- fi-icl-u3:  [PASS][7] -> [DMESG-WARN][8] ([fdo#107724]) +2 
similar issues
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_b...@basic-wait-after-default.html

  
 Possible fixes 

  * igt@gem_ctx_create@basic-files:
- fi-bdw-gvtdvm:  [DMESG-WARN][9] -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_ctx_cre...@basic-files.html

  * igt@gem_flink_basic@double-flink:
- fi-icl-u3:  [DMESG-WARN][11] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][12] +2 
similar issues
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_flink_ba...@double-flink.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
- fi-cfl-guc: [DMESG-FAIL][13] -> [PASS][14]
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
- fi-cml-u:   [DMESG-FAIL][15] -> [PASS][16]
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-cml-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-cml-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
- fi-whl-u:   [INCOMPLETE][17] -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-whl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
- {fi-icl-guc}:   [INCOMPLETE][19] ([fdo#107713]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-icl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-icl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-a:
- {fi-tgl-u2}:[DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#111600]) -> [PASS][22]
   [21]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7114/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_b...@basic-flip-a.html
   [22]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14843/fi-tgl-u2/igt@kms_b...@basic-flip-a.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
  the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724
  [fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569
  [fdo#110566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?i