Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
Issue is related to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3576
[ADL-P] KMS tests - dmesg-warn/dmesg-fail - *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun:
(port|soft),transcoder,
And the latest reg from rev 2 is
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5343
igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-psr - crash - Received signal SIGSEGV.
Thanks,
Lakshmi.
-Original Message-
From: Roper, Matthew D
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 9:34 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs
due to SSEU
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:01:44AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101369/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11363 -> Patchwork_22566
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22566 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_22566, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (50 -> 43)
> --
>
> Additional (3): bat-adlm-1 bat-adlp-4 fi-kbl-8809g
> Missing(10): shard-tglu fi-hsw-4200u shard-rkl fi-icl-u2 fi-bsw-cyan
> fi-kbl-7500u fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4770 bat-rpls-2 fi-bdw-samus
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_22566:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset@a-edp1:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][1]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/ig
> t@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-mode...@a-edp1.html
<3> [273.206566] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun:
port,transcoder,
A display underrun wouldn't be related to how a debugfs file (which isn't being
used here) allocates memory.
It seems like there are also a bunch of missing machines listed above for no
apparent reason. Submitting a re-test.
Matt
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * igt@kms_busy@basic@flip:
> - {bat-adlp-6}: [PASS][2] -> [DMESG-WARN][3]
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-6/ig
> t@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
>
> * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> - {bat-dg2-9}:[DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#5193]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][5]
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-dg2-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-dg2-9/igt
> @kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22566 that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#4962]) +1 similar
> issue
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/
> igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
>
> * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/
> igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
>
> * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/ig
> t@gem_lmem_swapp...@basic.html
>
> * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random-engines:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3
> similar issues
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/
> igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random-engines.html
>
> * igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#3282])
>[10]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/ig
> t@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
>
> * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +55 similar
> issues
>[11]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/
> igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
>
> * igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api:
> -
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:01:44AM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101369/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11363 -> Patchwork_22566
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22566 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_22566, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (50 -> 43)
> --
>
> Additional (3): bat-adlm-1 bat-adlp-4 fi-kbl-8809g
> Missing(10): shard-tglu fi-hsw-4200u shard-rkl fi-icl-u2 fi-bsw-cyan
> fi-kbl-7500u fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4770 bat-rpls-2 fi-bdw-samus
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_22566:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset@a-edp1:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][1]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-mode...@a-edp1.html
<3> [273.206566] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun:
port,transcoder,
A display underrun wouldn't be related to how a debugfs file (which
isn't being used here) allocates memory.
It seems like there are also a bunch of missing machines listed above
for no apparent reason. Submitting a re-test.
Matt
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * igt@kms_busy@basic@flip:
> - {bat-adlp-6}: [PASS][2] -> [DMESG-WARN][3]
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
>
> * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> - {bat-dg2-9}:[DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#5193]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][5]
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-dg2-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-dg2-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22566 that come from known issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#4962]) +1 similar
> issue
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
>
> * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
>
> * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@basic.html
>
> * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random-engines:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3
> similar issues
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random-engines.html
>
> * igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#3282])
>[10]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
>
> * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +55 similar
> issues
>[11]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
>
> * igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api:
> - bat-dg1-6: [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#4032])
>[12]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-api.html
>[13]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-api.html
>
> * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-read:
> - fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827])
> +8 similar issues
>[14]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@kms_chamel...@hdmi-edid-read.html
>
> * igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-fast:
> - bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN ->
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101369/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11363 -> Patchwork_22566
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22566 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_22566, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/index.html
Participating hosts (50 -> 43)
--
Additional (3): bat-adlm-1 bat-adlp-4 fi-kbl-8809g
Missing(10): shard-tglu fi-hsw-4200u shard-rkl fi-icl-u2 fi-bsw-cyan
fi-kbl-7500u fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4770 bat-rpls-2 fi-bdw-samus
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22566:
### IGT changes ###
Possible regressions
* igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-modeset@a-edp1:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][1]
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-mode...@a-edp1.html
Suppressed
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* igt@kms_busy@basic@flip:
- {bat-adlp-6}: [PASS][2] -> [DMESG-WARN][3]
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-6/igt@kms_busy@ba...@flip.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
- {bat-dg2-9}:[DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#5193]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][5]
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-dg2-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-dg2-9/igt@kms_pipe_crc_ba...@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_22566 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
- fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([i915#4962]) +1 similar
issue
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2190])
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@basic.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random-engines:
- fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +3
similar issues
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random-engines.html
* igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#3282])
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
- fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271]) +55 similar issues
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
* igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api:
- bat-dg1-6: [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#4032])
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11363/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-api.html
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-api.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-read:
- fi-kbl-8809g: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +8
similar issues
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/fi-kbl-8809g/igt@kms_chamel...@hdmi-edid-read.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-fast:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#111827]) +8 similar issues
[15]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@kms_chamel...@vga-hpd-fast.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([i915#4103]) +1 similar issue
[16]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22566/bat-adlp-4/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy.html
* igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
- bat-adlp-4: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109285])
[17]:
