subject:"\[Intel\-gfx\] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT\: failure for series starting with \[1\/9\] drm\/i915\: Expose 10\:10\:10 XRGB formats on SNB\-BDW sprites \(rev2\)"

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-15 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:25:59PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:41:20AM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:23:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> > > > == Series Details ==
> > > > 
> > > > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB 
> > > > formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> > > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> > > > State : failure
> > > > 
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > > 
> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Summary
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >   **FAILURE**
> > > > 
> > > >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely 
> > > > need to be
> > > >   verified manually.
> > > >   
> > > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > > >   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to 
> > > > allow them
> > > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives 
> > > > in CI.
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > 
> > > > Possible new issues
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> > > > Patchwork_14725_full:
> > > > 
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > > 
> > > >  Possible regressions 
> > > > 
> > > >   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> > > > - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > > >[1]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > > >[2]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > > > 
> > > >   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> > > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
> > > >[3]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > > >[4]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > > 
> > > IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
> > > ...
> > > Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
> > > (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
> > > 0x30335241 to 0x78464749)
> > > 
> > > DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
> > > IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749
> > > 
> > > { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
> > >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,
> > > 
> > > { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
> > >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,
> > > 
> > > if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
> > > (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
> > >   cnvert_pixman(cvt);
> > >   return;
> > > ...
> > > igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);
> > > 
> > > So wtf?
> > > 
> > > Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
> > >  #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
> > >  #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
> > >  #endif
> > > to happen?
> > 
> > oof, seems like the building machine got downgraded somehow
> > 
> > ci-worker1:~$ dpkg -l '*pixman*'
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > | 
> > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> > ||/ NameVersion 
> >  Architecture Description
> > +++-===---===
> > ii  libpixman-1-0:amd64 0.34.0-2
> >  amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo
> > ii  libpixman-1-dev:amd64   0.34.0-2
> >  amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and 
> > cairo (development files)
> > 
> > that's bad...
> > 
> > > But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so
> > > I don't think that can be the case.
> > 
> > That's the weird bit...
> > 
> > Anyway the building machine needs updating and apt-mark hold.
> > This can cause fallout and we need to file bugs to limit the noise.
> > 
> > There is quite some queue right now, but hopefully by tomorrow it will
> > be drained. I'll do the necessary updates and force IGT run to see what
> > is going to happen in the morning. Then I'll rerun this series.
> > 
> 
> 
> I don't think the builder ever had a higher version.
> 
> The fancy YUV formats work because the runtime lib is new enough, and
> the build-time

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:25:59PM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:41:20AM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:23:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> > > > == Series Details ==
> > > > 
> > > > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB 
> > > > formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> > > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> > > > State : failure
> > > > 
> > > > == Summary ==
> > > > 
> > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Summary
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >   **FAILURE**
> > > > 
> > > >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely 
> > > > need to be
> > > >   verified manually.
> > > >   
> > > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > > >   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to 
> > > > allow them
> > > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives 
> > > > in CI.
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > 
> > > > Possible new issues
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> > > > Patchwork_14725_full:
> > > > 
> > > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > > 
> > > >  Possible regressions 
> > > > 
> > > >   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> > > > - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > > >[1]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > > >[2]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > > > 
> > > >   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> > > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
> > > >[3]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > > >[4]: 
> > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > > 
> > > IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
> > > ...
> > > Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
> > > (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
> > > 0x30335241 to 0x78464749)
> > > 
> > > DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
> > > IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749
> > > 
> > > { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
> > >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,
> > > 
> > > { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
> > >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,
> > > 
> > > if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
> > > (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
> > >   cnvert_pixman(cvt);
> > >   return;
> > > ...
> > > igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);
> > > 
> > > So wtf?
> > > 
> > > Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
> > >  #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
> > >  #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
> > >  #endif
> > > to happen?
> > 
> > oof, seems like the building machine got downgraded somehow
> > 
> > ci-worker1:~$ dpkg -l '*pixman*'
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > | 
> > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> > ||/ NameVersion 
> >  Architecture Description
> > +++-===---===
> > ii  libpixman-1-0:amd64 0.34.0-2
> >  amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo
> > ii  libpixman-1-dev:amd64   0.34.0-2
> >  amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and 
> > cairo (development files)
> > 
> > that's bad...
> > 
> > > But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so
> > > I don't think that can be the case.
> > 
> > That's the weird bit...
> > 
> > Anyway the building machine needs updating and apt-mark hold.
> > This can cause fallout and we need to file bugs to limit the noise.
> > 
> > There is quite some queue right now, but hopefully by tomorrow it will
> > be drained. I'll do the necessary updates and force IGT run to see what
> > is going to happen in the morning. Then I'll rerun this series.
> > 
> 
> 
> I don't think the builder ever had a higher version.
> 
> The fancy YUV formats work because the runtime lib is new enough, and
> the build-time

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-15 Thread Petri Latvala

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:41:20AM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:23:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats 
> > > on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> > > State : failure
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Summary
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >   **FAILURE**
> > > 
> > >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely 
> > > need to be
> > >   verified manually.
> > >   
> > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > >   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to 
> > > allow them
> > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in 
> > > CI.
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > Possible new issues
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> > > Patchwork_14725_full:
> > > 
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > 
> > >  Possible regressions 
> > > 
> > >   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> > > - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> > >[1]: 
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > >[2]: 
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > > 
> > >   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
> > >[3]: 
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > >[4]: 
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> > 
> > IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
> > ...
> > Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
> > (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
> > 0x30335241 to 0x78464749)
> > 
> > DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
> > IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749
> > 
> > { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
> >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,
> > 
> > { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
> >   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,
> > 
> > if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
> > (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
> > cnvert_pixman(cvt);
> > return;
> > ...
> > igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);
> > 
> > So wtf?
> > 
> > Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
> >  #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
> >  #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
> >  #endif
> > to happen?
> 
> oof, seems like the building machine got downgraded somehow
> 
> ci-worker1:~$ dpkg -l '*pixman*'
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
> ||/ NameVersion   
>Architecture Description
> +++-===---===
> ii  libpixman-1-0:amd64 0.34.0-2  
>amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo
> ii  libpixman-1-dev:amd64   0.34.0-2  
>amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo 
> (development files)
> 
> that's bad...
> 
> > But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so
> > I don't think that can be the case.
> 
> That's the weird bit...
> 
> Anyway the building machine needs updating and apt-mark hold.
> This can cause fallout and we need to file bugs to limit the noise.
> 
> There is quite some queue right now, but hopefully by tomorrow it will
> be drained. I'll do the necessary updates and force IGT run to see what
> is going to happen in the morning. Then I'll rerun this series.
> 


I don't think the builder ever had a higher version.

The fancy YUV formats work because the runtime lib is new enough, and
the build-time checks for those are as such:

#if CAIRO_VERSION < CAIRO_VERSION_ENCODE(1, 17, 2)
/*
 * We need cairo 1.17.2 to use HDR formats, but the only thing added is a value
 * to cairo_format_t.
 *
 * To prevent going outside the enum, make cairo_format_t an int and define
 * ourselves.
*/

#define

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-15 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:23:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats 
> > on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> > 
> > 
> > Summary
> > ---
> > 
> >   **FAILURE**
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need 
> > to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
> > them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in 
> > CI.
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > Possible new issues
> > ---
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> > Patchwork_14725_full:
> > 
> > ### IGT changes ###
> > 
> >  Possible regressions 
> > 
> >   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> > - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> >[1]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> >[2]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > 
> >   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
> >[3]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> >[4]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> 
> IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
> ...
> Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
> (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
> 0x30335241 to 0x78464749)
> 
> DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
> IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749
> 
> { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
>   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,
> 
> { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
>   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,
> 
> if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
> (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
>   cnvert_pixman(cvt);
>   return;
> ...
> igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);
> 
> So wtf?
> 
> Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
>  #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
>  #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
>  #endif
> to happen?

oof, seems like the building machine got downgraded somehow

ci-worker1:~$ dpkg -l '*pixman*'
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersion 
 Architecture Description
+++-===---===
ii  libpixman-1-0:amd64 0.34.0-2
 amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo
ii  libpixman-1-dev:amd64   0.34.0-2
 amd64pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo 
(development files)

that's bad...

> But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so
> I don't think that can be the case.

That's the weird bit...

Anyway the building machine needs updating and apt-mark hold.
This can cause fallout and we need to file bugs to limit the noise.

There is quite some queue right now, but hopefully by tomorrow it will
be drained. I'll do the necessary updates and force IGT run to see what
is going to happen in the morning. Then I'll rerun this series.

-- 
Cheers,
Arek
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-14 Thread Chris Wilson

Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2019-10-14 20:23:42)
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats 
> > on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> > 
> > 
> > Summary
> > ---
> > 
> >   **FAILURE**
> > 
> >   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need 
> > to be
> >   verified manually.
> >   
> >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> >   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
> > them
> >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in 
> > CI.
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > Possible new issues
> > ---
> > 
> >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> > Patchwork_14725_full:
> > 
> > ### IGT changes ###
> > 
> >  Possible regressions 
> > 
> >   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> > - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
> >[1]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> >[2]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> > 
> >   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
> >[3]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> >[4]: 
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
> 
> IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
> ...
> Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
> (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
> 0x30335241 to 0x78464749)
> 
> DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
> IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749
> 
> { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
>   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,
> 
> { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
>   .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,
> 
> if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
> (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
> cnvert_pixman(cvt);
> return;
> ...
> igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);
> 
> So wtf?
> 
> Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
>  #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
>  #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
>  #endif
> to happen?

That's the only way I can see, perhaps stick a #warn in there.
-Chris
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-14 Thread Ville Syrjälä

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on 
> SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full
> 
> 
> Summary
> ---
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need to 
> be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow 
> them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Possible new issues
> ---
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> Patchwork_14725_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
>  Possible regressions 
> 
>   * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
> - shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
>[1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
>[2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
> 
>   * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
> - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
>[3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
>[4]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html

IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f
...
Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x103 on A.0
(kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 
0x30335241 to 0x78464749)

DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 =  0x30335241
IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749

{ .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010,
  .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10,

{ .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT,
  .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float,

if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) &&
(drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) {
cnvert_pixman(cvt);
return;
...
igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...);

So wtf?

Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing
 #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0)
 #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid
 #endif
to happen?

But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so
I don't think that can be the case.

And my CHV can run this test with ARGB2101010 just fine so
the code can't be totally broken.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

2019-10-09 Thread Patchwork

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on 
SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_14725_full:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us:
- shard-snb:  [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_...@in-flight-1us.html

  * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html

  
 Suppressed 

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes:
- {shard-tglb}:   [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +1 similar issue
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes.html

  * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-c-planes:
- {shard-tglb}:   NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7] +2 similar issues
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_pl...@pixel-format-pipe-c-planes.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14725_full that come from known 
issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate:
- shard-snb:  [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([fdo#111925])
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb1/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb2/igt@gem_...@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@promotion-bsd1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][10] -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109276]) +11 similar 
issues
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_sched...@promotion-bsd1.html
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_sched...@promotion-bsd1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][12] -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#111325]) +1 similar 
issue
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_sched...@reorder-wide-bsd.html
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_sched...@reorder-wide-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
- shard-glk:  [PASS][14] -> [INCOMPLETE][15] ([fdo#103359] / 
[fdo#108686] / [k.org#198133])
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-glk8/igt@gem_tiled_swapp...@non-threaded.html
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-glk8/igt@gem_tiled_swapp...@non-threaded.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy:
- shard-snb:  [PASS][16] -> [DMESG-WARN][17] ([fdo#111870]) +1 
similar issue
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb4/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb5/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close:
- shard-hsw:  [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([fdo#111870]) +2 
similar issues
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@sync-unmap-after-close.html
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_userptr_bl...@sync-unmap-after-close.html

  * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context:
- shard-apl:  [PASS][20] -> [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#108566]) +5 
similar issues
   [20]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-apl1/igt@gem_workarou...@suspend-resume-context.html
   [21]:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2)

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information