Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassa valerio...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx You need to add a seperate dri2 device to .drirc for vblank_mode to work there, driconf doesn't work right device screen=0 driver=dri2 application name=Default option name=vblank_mode value=0 / /application /device my full ~/.drirc for example driconf device screen=0 driver=dri2 application name=Default option name=vblank_mode value=0 / /application /device device screen=0 driver=i915 application name=Default option name=force_s3tc_enable value=false / option name=no_rast value=false / option name=always_flush_cache value=false / option name=stub_occlusion_query value=false / option name=always_flush_batch value=false / option name=bo_reuse value=1 / option name=texture_tiling value=true / option name=early_z value=false / option name=allow_large_textures value=2 / option name=fragment_shader value=false / /application /device /driconf ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
I tried to change .drirc to add the xml for dri2 but glxgears still rating ~60FPS. Also with $ vblank_mode=0 glxgears it rates ~60FPS. Il 01/08/2010 17:26, Robert Hooker ha scritto: On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Valerio Camassavalerio...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx You need to add a seperate dri2 device to .drirc for vblank_mode to work there, driconf doesn't work right device screen=0 driver=dri2 application name=Default option name=vblank_mode value=0 / /application /device my full ~/.drirc for example driconf device screen=0 driver=dri2 application name=Default option name=vblank_mode value=0 / /application /device device screen=0 driver=i915 application name=Default option name=force_s3tc_enable value=false / option name=no_rast value=false / option name=always_flush_cache value=false / option name=stub_occlusion_query value=false / option name=always_flush_batch value=false / option name=bo_reuse value=1 / option name=texture_tiling value=true / option name=early_z value=false / option name=allow_large_textures value=2 / option name=fragment_shader value=false / /application /device /driconf ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Ops, It's with with 2.10 i obtain ~700FPS, i mistyped, sorry. I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: / 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS / With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Am Samstag, den 31.07.2010, 10:36 +0200 schrieb Valerio Camassa: I tried to change vblank_mode with driconf and with set param vblank_mode, but i obtain the same fps with 2.11 and 2.12 drivers: 311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.175 FPS With 2.12 glxgears rates ~700FPS. 62.175 FPS ≠ 700 FPS Why do you write it is the same? Thanks, Paul signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
62.175 FPS ≠ 700 FPS Why do you write it is the same? Thanks, Paul Sorry, I wrote, soon after, that I mistyped. Is with 2.10 that glxgears rates ~700fps. With 2.11 and 2.12 rates ~60fps. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Hi, i have the same problems with 2.11 and 2.12 intel driver and mesa 7.8. In 3D application i have annoying stuttering and in glxgears (and others 3d application) i don't obtain more than 60fps (i think is active vsync). The stuttering problem is mitigated with mesa 7.9 (but is not solved), the vsync problem is solved with downgrade to 2.10 drivers and i would to say how can i disable vsync in new driver? i watched the configure compile options of mesa and drv-intel packages, but i didn't find anything. I use Fedora 13 Amd64. Greetings. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 15:20 +0200, Camassa Valerio wrote: the vsync problem is solved with downgrade to 2.10 drivers and i would to say how can i disable vsync in new driver? i watched the configure compile options of mesa and drv-intel packages, but i didn't find anything. It's not a compile-time option. Set the environment variable vblank_mode to 0 to disable vsync, like so: $ vblank_mode=0 glxgears Or set it with the driconf tool. -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 23:29:02 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote: Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for what's wrong here? kernel 2.6.34-rc6, xorg-server-1.8.2, xf86-video-intel-2.12.0,T61 laptop, card The most important piece of software here is Mesa. What version of Mesa? Sorry, I forgot, latest 7.8.2. When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, without a change to the stuttering. The Xserver is 1.7.7. the FPS output in glxgears was even higher than with Mesa 7.7, but it looked ugly because of the stuttering. Do you have a chance to downgrade to Mesa 7.7? Regards, Tino ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, without a change to the stuttering. The Xserver is 1.7.7. the FPS output in glxgears was even higher than with Mesa 7.7, but it looked ugly because of the stuttering. Do you have a chance to downgrade to Mesa 7.7? Tried 7.7.1, no change in performance. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail:ha...@hboeck.de http://schokokeks.org - professional webhosting signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, without a change to the stuttering. The Xserver is 1.7.7. the FPS output in glxgears was even higher than with Mesa 7.7, but it looked ugly because of the stuttering. Do you have a chance to downgrade to Mesa 7.7? Tried 7.7.1, no change in performance. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail: ha...@hboeck.de http://schokokeks.org - professional webhosting You're saying it's slow, but in relation to what? Were previous versions faster, or is the comparison being made between hardware? Matt ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Am Donnerstag, den 29.07.2010, 12:24 -0400 schrieb Matt Turner: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Am Donnerstag 29 Juli 2010 schrieb Tino Keitel: When I tried Mesa 7.8 from Debian experimental I got stuttering 3D output, at least in neverball and glxgears. I tried libdrm2 2.4.18, 2.4.21, kernel 2.6.34, 2.6.35-rc5, and the Intel driver 2.11 and 2.12, without a change to the stuttering. The Xserver is 1.7.7. the FPS output in glxgears was even higher than with Mesa 7.7, but it looked ugly because of the stuttering. Do you have a chance to downgrade to Mesa 7.7? Tried 7.7.1, no change in performance. You're saying it's slow, but in relation to what? Were previous versions faster, or is the comparison being made between hardware? In his original post he wrote that his old r200 card was faster in the q3demo benchmark [1]. Thanks, Paul [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2010-July/007538.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 29.07.2010 18:24, schrieb Matt Turner: You're saying it's slow, but in relation to what? Were previous versions faster, or is the comparison being made between hardware? Well I see the same problem here, using OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20100328 2010Q1 OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.8.2 I get stuttering when scrolling in warzone2100. I've been using the same hardware for years, and the problem appeared some time this month, AFAIR around the time I upgraded Mesa from 7.7 to 7.8, but it could have some other cause. Philipp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxRvPUACgkQbtUV+xsoLpq+QACg7HqYAaBoVVjF/+dDcmfHeBD5 puYAoKab5N4Q2uFpjDKl5CRyQGiZstFq =CMrQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Le 28/07/2010 23:17, Hanno Böck a écrit : Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for what's wrong here? Sounds like you're hitting the vsync limit. I wouldn't know on my old 855 since no game/3D app ever gets close to 60fps anyway. Try comparing with glxgears: if it yields 60fps, then it's the vsync. If it's some other frame rate, then never mind. Cheers, Rémi ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for what's wrong here? kernel 2.6.34-rc6, xorg-server-1.8.2, xf86-video-intel-2.12.0,T61 laptop, card is 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c) dmesg says: agpgart-intel :00:00.0: Intel 965GM Chipset agpgart-intel :00:00.0: detected 7676K stolen memory agpgart-intel :00:00.0: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe000 [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 i915 :00:02.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 i915 :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64 ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present) i915 :00:02.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X [drm] set up 7M of stolen space [drm] initialized overlay support Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 175x65 fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device drm: registered panic notifier acpi device:01: registered as cooling_device2 input: Video Bus as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/LNXVIDEO:00/input/input3 ACPI: Video Device [VID] (multi-head: yes rom: no post: no) [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 xorg log says: [24.079] (==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp [24.079] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] Setup complete [24.079] (II) intel(0): [DRI2] DRI driver: i965 [24.079] (**) intel(0): Tiling enabled [24.079] (**) intel(0): SwapBuffers wait enabled [24.079] (==) intel(0): VideoRam: 262144 KB [24.079] (II) intel(0): Allocated new frame buffer 1408x1050 stride 5632, tiled [24.119] (II) UXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations: [24.119] (II) solid [24.119] (II) copy [24.119] (II) composite (RENDER acceleration) [24.119] (II) put_image [24.119] (II) get_image [24.119] (==) intel(0): Backing store disabled [24.119] (==) intel(0): Silken mouse enabled [24.119] (II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor [24.147] (II) intel(0): RandR 1.2 enabled, ignore the following RandR disabled message. [24.152] (==) intel(0): DPMS enabled [24.152] (==) intel(0): Intel XvMC decoder enabled [24.152] (II) intel(0): Set up textured video [24.152] (II) intel(0): Set up overlay video [24.152] (II) intel(0): [XvMC] i965_xvmc driver initialized. [24.152] (II) intel(0): direct rendering: DRI2 Enabled [24.152] (--) RandR disabled [24.152] (II) Initializing built-in extension Generic Event Extension [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension SHAPE [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension BIG-REQUESTS [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension SYNC [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-MISC -- [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE [24.153] (II) Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE [24.430] (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer [24.430] (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_INTEL_swap_event [24.430] (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_SGI_swap_control and GLX_MESA_swap_control [24.430] (II) AIGLX: enabled GLX_SGI_make_current_read [24.430] (II) AIGLX: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap backed by buffer objects [24.430] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib64/dri/i965_dri.so [24.430] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0 -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail:ha...@hboeck.de http://schokokeks.org - professional webhosting signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low
Am Mittwoch 28 Juli 2010 schrieb Matt Turner: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Hanno Böck ha...@hboeck.de wrote: Hi, it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) gives me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. From the logs everything seems to be fine. Any ideas what I could look for what's wrong here? kernel 2.6.34-rc6, xorg-server-1.8.2, xf86-video-intel-2.12.0,T61 laptop, card The most important piece of software here is Mesa. What version of Mesa? Sorry, I forgot, latest 7.8.2. -- Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber/Mail:ha...@hboeck.de http://schokokeks.org - professional webhosting signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
