Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-13 Thread Ben Guthro
I'm struggling to get back to a version that works on the Shark Bay /
Haswell platform that I have.

I did get it to work once...but have since updated the BIOS, so am not
sure if that may have an effect on this test.

v3.5 also gave a stack (below) - so without a working version, I
cannot do the bisecting.

Perhaps it is just too early in the Haswell dev cycle for me to try to
get this working?



[   16.599822] [ cut here ]
[   16.605099] WARNING: at
/data/home/bguthro/dev/newdev-tip/linux-3.5/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:976
assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]()
[   16.619568] Hardware name: Shark Bay Client platform
[   16.625244] FDI TX state assertion failure (expected off, current on)
[   16.632632] Modules linked in: ahci(+) libahci crc32c_intel
e1000e(+) ehci_hcd(+) i915(+) drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video
xhci_hcd intel_agp intel_gtt
[   16.648576] Pid: 142, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.5.0-orc #14
[   16.655275] Call Trace:
[   16.658130]  [8104f67f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[   16.665023]  [8104f776] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[   16.665058] usb 1-11: new low-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
[   16.679111]  [a00b8c57] assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]
[   16.686001]  [a00bdd65] ironlake_crtc_disable+0x185/0x820 [i915]
[   16.689451] usb 1-11: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64
microframes, ep desc says 80 microframes
[   16.703942]  [a00be48e] ironlake_crtc_dpms+0x8e/0xa0 [i915]
[   16.711309]  [a00b9bc8] intel_crtc_dpms+0x48/0x140 [i915]
[   16.718487]  [a00c1af5] intel_crtc_disable+0x35/0xb0 [i915]
[   16.721916] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[   16.721917] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[   16.736714]  [a008c6a5]
drm_helper_disable_unused_functions+0x115/0x190 [drm_kms_helper]
[   16.746959]  [a00c3ba7] intel_modeset_init+0x687/0xe50 [i915]
[   16.754536]  [a009cd3a] i915_driver_load+0xa9a/0xb80 [i915]
[   16.761932]  [a003aa7b] ? drm_get_minor+0x26b/0x310 [drm]
[   16.769086]  [a003ce71] drm_get_pci_dev+0x191/0x2b0 [drm]
[   16.776278]  [8157801e] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x30
[   16.784065]  [a00e5917] i915_pci_probe+0x1b/0x1d [i915]
[   16.791041]  [812da410] pci_device_probe+0xb0/0x140
[   16.797631]  [813909be] driver_probe_device+0x7e/0x220
[   16.804527]  [81390c0b] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0
[   16.810929]  [81390b60] ? driver_probe_device+0x220/0x220
[   16.818106]  [8138ede6] bus_for_each_dev+0x56/0x90
[   16.824609]  [813904ce] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[   16.830814]  [81390080] bus_add_driver+0x1a0/0x270
[   16.837305]  [81391166] driver_register+0x76/0x130
[   16.843805]  [812da135] __pci_register_driver+0x55/0xd0
[   16.850795]  [8157bdcd] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[   16.857786]  [a003d0aa] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm]
[   16.859591] usb 1-12: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[   16.872169]  [a0116000] ? 0xa0115fff
[   16.878075]  [a011608b] i915_init+0x8b/0x8d [i915]
[   16.884568]  [8100203f] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170
[   16.887716] usb 1-12: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 128
microframes, ep desc says 192 microframes
[   16.901316]  [810affcf] sys_init_module+0x8f/0x200
[   16.907797]  [81580069] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   16.914692] ---[ end trace 941488b1333d181e ]---



On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Ben Guthro b...@guthro.net wrote:
 I'll try to do this early next week, and report back.


 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
 On 2012-08-10 09:25, Ben Guthro wrote:

 Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 
 running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
 all can possibly help with.

 I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
 following patch:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/

 This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
 i915, and use KMS.

 After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
 unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
 boot.


 I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.

 However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
 even with applying the patch above.


 I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
 like a regression from 3.5
 Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?


 Yes it is the codebase you should use. It sounds like a regression, can you
 bisect it?



 Ben
 ___
 Intel-gfx mailing list
 Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


 --
 Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

 

[Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Ben Guthro
Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 
running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
all can possibly help with.

I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
following patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/

This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
i915, and use KMS.

After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
boot.


I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.

However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
even with applying the patch above.


I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
like a regression from 3.5
Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?


Ben
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Ben Guthro
specifically, I get the following in my serial console - it is a
warning...but seems to coincide with when standard vesa modes are
switching over to the higer res KMS modes:

[   15.889193] [drm:__gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get] *ERROR* Force wake
wait timed out
[   15.897707] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010).
[   15.905161] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
[   15.912293] vgaarb: device changed decodes:
PCI::00:02.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
[   15.943700] [ cut here ]
[   15.949041] WARNING: at
/data/home/bguthro/dev/newdev-tip/linux-3.2/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1118
assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]()
[   15.963591] Hardware name: Shark Bay Client platform
[   15.969288] FDI TX state assertion failure (expected off, current on)
[   15.976678] Modules linked in: crc32c_intel ahci(+) libahci
ehci_hcd(+) e1000e(+) i915(+) drm_kms_helper drm intel_agp
i2c_algo_bit intel_gtt video xhci_hcd
[   15.992621] Pid: 148, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.6.0-orc #9
[   15.993459] usb 1-5: new low-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
[   16.006609] Call Trace:
[   16.009462]  [8105284f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[   16.016356]  [81052946] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[   16.019911] usb 1-5: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
ep desc says 80 microframes
[   16.032989]  [a00c48c7] assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]
[   16.040070]  [a00c9f55] ironlake_crtc_disable+0x185/0x820 [i915]
[   16.047923]  [a00ca67e] ironlake_crtc_dpms+0x8e/0xa0 [i915]
[   16.055302]  [a00c5a58] intel_crtc_dpms+0x48/0x140 [i915]
[   16.061100] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[   16.061101] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[   16.073325]  [a00cdf95] intel_crtc_disable+0x35/0xb0 [i915]
[   16.080700]  [a0095735]
drm_helper_disable_unused_functions+0x115/0x190 [drm_kms_helper]
[   16.090943]  [a00d00a7] intel_modeset_init+0x6b7/0xf10 [i915]
[   16.098525]  [a00a6bba] i915_driver_load+0xa8a/0xb90 [i915]
[   16.105913]  [a004372b] ? drm_get_minor+0x26b/0x310 [drm]
[   16.113082]  [a0045c21] drm_get_pci_dev+0x191/0x2b0 [drm]
[   16.120276]  [8158f30e] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x30
[   16.128061]  [a00f309b] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x57 [i915]
[   16.135039]  [812e0d30] pci_device_probe+0xb0/0x140
[   16.141631]  [8139faab] driver_probe_device+0x7b/0x240
[   16.148525]  [8139fd1b] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0
[   16.154927]  [8139fc70] ? driver_probe_device+0x240/0x240
[   16.162106]  [8139dec6] bus_for_each_dev+0x56/0x90
[   16.168607]  [8139f5de] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[   16.174811]  [8139f150] bus_add_driver+0x190/0x290
[   16.181303]  [813a027a] driver_register+0x7a/0x160
[   16.187805]  [812e0a55] __pci_register_driver+0x55/0xd0
[   16.193436] usb 1-6: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[   16.202180]  [815930cd] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[   16.209173]  [a0045e5a] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm]
[   16.216061]  [a0125000] ? 0xa0124fff
[   16.221970]  [a0125066] i915_init+0x66/0x68 [i915]
[   16.223558] usb 1-6: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 128
microframes, ep desc says 192 microframes
[   16.238617]  [8100203f] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170
[   16.245104]  [810b3dbf] sys_init_module+0x8f/0x200
[   16.251599]  [815973a9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   16.258494] ---[ end trace 949ccd38b0452265 ]---




On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Ben Guthro b...@guthro.net wrote:
 Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 
 running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
 all can possibly help with.

 I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
 following patch:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/

 This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
 i915, and use KMS.

 After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
 unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
 boot.


 I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.

 However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
 even with applying the patch above.


 I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
 like a regression from 3.5
 Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?


 Ben
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
 specifically, I get the following in my serial console - it is a
 warning...but seems to coincide with when standard vesa modes are
 switching over to the higer res KMS modes:

Can you try to boot with i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 please?
-Daniel

 
 [   15.889193] [drm:__gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get] *ERROR* Force wake
 wait timed out
 [   15.897707] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010).
 [   15.905161] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
 [   15.912293] vgaarb: device changed decodes:
 PCI::00:02.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
 [   15.943700] [ cut here ]
 [   15.949041] WARNING: at
 /data/home/bguthro/dev/newdev-tip/linux-3.2/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1118
 assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]()
 [   15.963591] Hardware name: Shark Bay Client platform
 [   15.969288] FDI TX state assertion failure (expected off, current on)
 [   15.976678] Modules linked in: crc32c_intel ahci(+) libahci
 ehci_hcd(+) e1000e(+) i915(+) drm_kms_helper drm intel_agp
 i2c_algo_bit intel_gtt video xhci_hcd
 [   15.992621] Pid: 148, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.6.0-orc #9
 [   15.993459] usb 1-5: new low-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
 [   16.006609] Call Trace:
 [   16.009462]  [8105284f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
 [   16.016356]  [81052946] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
 [   16.019911] usb 1-5: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
 ep desc says 80 microframes
 [   16.032989]  [a00c48c7] assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]
 [   16.040070]  [a00c9f55] ironlake_crtc_disable+0x185/0x820 [i915]
 [   16.047923]  [a00ca67e] ironlake_crtc_dpms+0x8e/0xa0 [i915]
 [   16.055302]  [a00c5a58] intel_crtc_dpms+0x48/0x140 [i915]
 [   16.061100] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
 [   16.061101] usbhid: USB HID core driver
 [   16.073325]  [a00cdf95] intel_crtc_disable+0x35/0xb0 [i915]
 [   16.080700]  [a0095735]
 drm_helper_disable_unused_functions+0x115/0x190 [drm_kms_helper]
 [   16.090943]  [a00d00a7] intel_modeset_init+0x6b7/0xf10 [i915]
 [   16.098525]  [a00a6bba] i915_driver_load+0xa8a/0xb90 [i915]
 [   16.105913]  [a004372b] ? drm_get_minor+0x26b/0x310 [drm]
 [   16.113082]  [a0045c21] drm_get_pci_dev+0x191/0x2b0 [drm]
 [   16.120276]  [8158f30e] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x30
 [   16.128061]  [a00f309b] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x57 [i915]
 [   16.135039]  [812e0d30] pci_device_probe+0xb0/0x140
 [   16.141631]  [8139faab] driver_probe_device+0x7b/0x240
 [   16.148525]  [8139fd1b] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0
 [   16.154927]  [8139fc70] ? driver_probe_device+0x240/0x240
 [   16.162106]  [8139dec6] bus_for_each_dev+0x56/0x90
 [   16.168607]  [8139f5de] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
 [   16.174811]  [8139f150] bus_add_driver+0x190/0x290
 [   16.181303]  [813a027a] driver_register+0x7a/0x160
 [   16.187805]  [812e0a55] __pci_register_driver+0x55/0xd0
 [   16.193436] usb 1-6: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
 [   16.202180]  [815930cd] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
 [   16.209173]  [a0045e5a] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm]
 [   16.216061]  [a0125000] ? 0xa0124fff
 [   16.221970]  [a0125066] i915_init+0x66/0x68 [i915]
 [   16.223558] usb 1-6: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 128
 microframes, ep desc says 192 microframes
 [   16.238617]  [8100203f] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170
 [   16.245104]  [810b3dbf] sys_init_module+0x8f/0x200
 [   16.251599]  [815973a9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 [   16.258494] ---[ end trace 949ccd38b0452265 ]---
 
 
 
 
 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Ben Guthro b...@guthro.net wrote:
  Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 
  running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
  all can possibly help with.
 
  I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
  following patch:
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/
 
  This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
  i915, and use KMS.
 
  After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
  unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
  boot.
 
 
  I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.
 
  However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
  even with applying the patch above.
 
 
  I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
  like a regression from 3.5
  Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?
 
 
  Ben
 ___
 Intel-gfx mailing list
 Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: 

Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Ben Guthro
well...it gave me a different stack...but still no graphics:

This is with the drm-intel-fixes branch merged in - I thought that
branch might help...but it didn't seem to.


[   16.615950] [ cut here ]
[   16.621229] WARNING: at
/data/home/bguthro/dev/newdev-tip/linux-3.2/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1119
assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]()
[   16.635796] Hardware name: Shark Bay Client platform
[   16.641472] FDI TX state assertion failure (expected off, current on)
[   16.648863] Modules linked in: crc32c_intel ahci(+) libahci
ehci_hcd(+) e1000e(+) i915(+) drm_kms_helper drm intel_agp
i2c_algo_bit intel_gtt video xhci_hcd
[   16.664808] Pid: 141, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.6.0-orc #11
[   16.671503] Call Trace:
[   16.674364]  [8105284f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[   16.681250]  [81052946] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[   16.681305] usb 1-5: new low-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
[   16.695251]  [a00c48f7] assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]
[   16.702135]  [a00c9fd5] ironlake_crtc_disable+0x185/0x820 [i915]
[   16.710013]  [a00ca6fe] ironlake_crtc_dpms+0x8e/0xa0 [i915]
[   16.711864] usb 1-5: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
ep desc says 80 microframes
[   16.727384]  [a00c5a88] intel_crtc_dpms+0x48/0x140 [i915]
[   16.734590]  [a00ce015] intel_crtc_disable+0x35/0xb0 [i915]
[   16.741932]  [a0095735]
drm_helper_disable_unused_functions+0x115/0x190 [drm_kms_helper]
[   16.751668] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[   16.751669] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[   16.763019]  [a00d0127] intel_modeset_init+0x6b7/0xf10 [i915]
[   16.770594]  [a00a6bba] i915_driver_load+0xa8a/0xb90 [i915]
[   16.777977]  [a004372b] ? drm_get_minor+0x26b/0x310 [drm]
[   16.785143]  [a0045c21] drm_get_pci_dev+0x191/0x2b0 [drm]
[   16.792337]  [8158553e] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1e/0x30
[   16.800125]  [a00f31eb] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x57 [i915]
[   16.807096]  [812e0d30] pci_device_probe+0xb0/0x140
[   16.813689]  [813997cb] driver_probe_device+0x7b/0x240
[   16.820582]  [81399a3b] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0
[   16.826984]  [8130] ? driver_probe_device+0x240/0x240
[   16.834163]  [81397be6] bus_for_each_dev+0x56/0x90
[   16.840664]  [813992fe] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[   16.840694] usb 1-6: new low-speed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd
[   16.854251]  [81398e70] bus_add_driver+0x190/0x290
[   16.860748]  [81399f9a] driver_register+0x7a/0x160
[   16.867247]  [812e0a55] __pci_register_driver+0x55/0xd0
[   16.868830] usb 1-6: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 128
microframes, ep desc says 192 microframes
[   16.884396]  [8158930d] ? notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[   16.891397]  [a0045e5a] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm]
[   16.898260]  [a0125000] ? 0xa0124fff
[   16.904172]  [a0125066] i915_init+0x66/0x68 [i915]
[   16.910666]  [8100203f] do_one_initcall+0x3f/0x170
[   16.917167]  [810b3dbf] sys_init_module+0x8f/0x200
[   16.923652]  [8158d5e9] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   16.930548] ---[ end trace fa81da3bacf4c4b0 ]---

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
 specifically, I get the following in my serial console - it is a
 warning...but seems to coincide with when standard vesa modes are
 switching over to the higer res KMS modes:

 Can you try to boot with i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 please?
 -Daniel


 [   15.889193] [drm:__gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get] *ERROR* Force wake
 wait timed out
 [   15.897707] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010).
 [   15.905161] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
 [   15.912293] vgaarb: device changed decodes:
 PCI::00:02.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
 [   15.943700] [ cut here ]
 [   15.949041] WARNING: at
 /data/home/bguthro/dev/newdev-tip/linux-3.2/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1118
 assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]()
 [   15.963591] Hardware name: Shark Bay Client platform
 [   15.969288] FDI TX state assertion failure (expected off, current on)
 [   15.976678] Modules linked in: crc32c_intel ahci(+) libahci
 ehci_hcd(+) e1000e(+) i915(+) drm_kms_helper drm intel_agp
 i2c_algo_bit intel_gtt video xhci_hcd
 [   15.992621] Pid: 148, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.6.0-orc #9
 [   15.993459] usb 1-5: new low-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
 [   16.006609] Call Trace:
 [   16.009462]  [8105284f] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
 [   16.016356]  [81052946] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
 [   16.019911] usb 1-5: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
 ep desc says 80 microframes
 [   16.032989]  [a00c48c7] assert_fdi_tx+0x87/0x90 [i915]
 [   16.040070]  [a00c9f55] 

Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Ben Widawsky

On 2012-08-10 09:25, Ben Guthro wrote:
Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 


running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
all can possibly help with.

I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
following patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/

This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
i915, and use KMS.

After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
boot.


I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed 
anything.


However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
even with applying the patch above.


I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
like a regression from 3.5
Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?



Yes it is the codebase you should use. It sounds like a regression, can 
you bisect it?




Ben
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] v3.6 haswell regression from v3.5?

2012-08-10 Thread Ben Guthro
I'll try to do this early next week, and report back.


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote:
 On 2012-08-10 09:25, Ben Guthro wrote:

 Hello, I've been attempting to get a Shark Bay / Haswell platform up 
 running, and have been having some difficulties that I'm hoping you
 all can possibly help with.

 I first tried the 3.5 kernel, and had some success after applying the
 following patch:
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1229541/

 This seemed to be necessary to get the  0x0c26 PCI id to be loaded by
 i915, and use KMS.

 After doing this, I had some success, but things still would become
 unstable, and flash test patterns on the screen about every third
 boot.


 I figured that I would move on to the tip, and see if that fixed anything.

 However, at the tip, I cannot get i915 to display graphics at all -
 even with applying the patch above.


 I understand that this is still under development - but this seems
 like a regression from 3.5
 Is there a codebase that I should be using for this testing?


 Yes it is the codebase you should use. It sounds like a regression, can you
 bisect it?



 Ben
 ___
 Intel-gfx mailing list
 Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


 --
 Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center

 ___
 Intel-gfx mailing list
 Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx