Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-04-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:49:38PM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
 
 
 On Monday 30 March 2015 09:13 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:03:58PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
 From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
 
 Cleanup idr table if any error happens after __create_hw_context() in
 i915_gem_create_context()
 
 Signed-off-by: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
 ---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 ++
   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 index f3e84c4..69bebe5 100644
 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 @@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ err_unpin:
 if (is_global_default_ctx  ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state)
 i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state);
   err_destroy:
 +   if (ctx-file_priv)
 +   idr_remove(ctx-file_priv-context_idr, ctx-user_handle);
 The common approach is to add a new err_idr: label at the op of the unwind
 code and make the call to idr_remove unconditional.
 
 Thanks, Daniel
 
 Thanks Daniel for review.
 I do not think we can have a unconditional idr remove since for global ctx
 i915_gem_create_context called with file_priv=NULL?

Hm right, the entire control-flow in there is a bit funny. I think a much
cleaner solution would be to drop the file_prive from create_context and
add a new i915_gem_context_create_user which wraps create_context and the
idr allocation. Doing the cleanup, conditionally, in a different function
than where we do the allocation is a bit too brittle imo.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-04-07 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:20:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:49:38PM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
  
  
  On Monday 30 March 2015 09:13 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:03:58PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
  From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
  
  Cleanup idr table if any error happens after __create_hw_context() in
  i915_gem_create_context()
  
  Signed-off-by: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
  ---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
  
  diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
  b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
  index f3e84c4..69bebe5 100644
  --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
  +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
  @@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ err_unpin:
if (is_global_default_ctx  ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state)

   i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state);
err_destroy:
  + if (ctx-file_priv)
  + idr_remove(ctx-file_priv-context_idr, ctx-user_handle);
  The common approach is to add a new err_idr: label at the op of the unwind
  code and make the call to idr_remove unconditional.
  
  Thanks, Daniel
  
  Thanks Daniel for review.
  I do not think we can have a unconditional idr remove since for global ctx
  i915_gem_create_context called with file_priv=NULL?
 
 Hm right, the entire control-flow in there is a bit funny. I think a much
 cleaner solution would be to drop the file_prive from create_context and
 add a new i915_gem_context_create_user which wraps create_context and the
 idr allocation. Doing the cleanup, conditionally, in a different function
 than where we do the allocation is a bit too brittle imo.

I suggested that it look like:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c#n179
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-04-07 Thread Deepak S



On Tuesday 07 April 2015 02:02 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:20:15AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:

On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 06:49:38PM +0530, Deepak S wrote:


On Monday 30 March 2015 09:13 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:03:58PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:

From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com

Cleanup idr table if any error happens after __create_hw_context() in
i915_gem_create_context()

Signed-off-by: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index f3e84c4..69bebe5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ err_unpin:
if (is_global_default_ctx  ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state)
i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state);
  err_destroy:
+   if (ctx-file_priv)
+   idr_remove(ctx-file_priv-context_idr, ctx-user_handle);

The common approach is to add a new err_idr: label at the op of the unwind
code and make the call to idr_remove unconditional.

Thanks, Daniel

Thanks Daniel for review.
I do not think we can have a unconditional idr remove since for global ctx
i915_gem_create_context called with file_priv=NULL?

Hm right, the entire control-flow in there is a bit funny. I think a much
cleaner solution would be to drop the file_prive from create_context and
add a new i915_gem_context_create_user which wraps create_context and the
idr allocation. Doing the cleanup, conditionally, in a different function
than where we do the allocation is a bit too brittle imo.

I suggested that it look like:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c#n179
-Chris


Thanks Chris and Daniel, I will submit cleaned up patches


___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-04-02 Thread Deepak S



On Monday 30 March 2015 09:13 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:03:58PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:

From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com

Cleanup idr table if any error happens after __create_hw_context() in
i915_gem_create_context()

Signed-off-by: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index f3e84c4..69bebe5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ err_unpin:
if (is_global_default_ctx  ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state)
i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state);
  err_destroy:
+   if (ctx-file_priv)
+   idr_remove(ctx-file_priv-context_idr, ctx-user_handle);

The common approach is to add a new err_idr: label at the op of the unwind
code and make the call to idr_remove unconditional.

Thanks, Daniel


Thanks Daniel for review.
I do not think we can have a unconditional idr remove since for global ctx
i915_gem_create_context called with file_priv=NULL?

- Thanks, Deepak


i915_gem_context_unreference(ctx);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
  }
--
1.9.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-03-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:03:58PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
 From: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
 
 Cleanup idr table if any error happens after __create_hw_context() in
 i915_gem_create_context()
 
 Signed-off-by: Deepak S deepa...@linux.intel.com
 ---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c 
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 index f3e84c4..69bebe5 100644
 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
 @@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ err_unpin:
   if (is_global_default_ctx  ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state)
   i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(ctx-legacy_hw_ctx.rcs_state);
  err_destroy:
 + if (ctx-file_priv)
 + idr_remove(ctx-file_priv-context_idr, ctx-user_handle);

The common approach is to add a new err_idr: label at the op of the unwind
code and make the call to idr_remove unconditional.

Thanks, Daniel

   i915_gem_context_unreference(ctx);
   return ERR_PTR(ret);
  }
 -- 
 1.9.1
 
 ___
 Intel-gfx mailing list
 Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean-up idr table if context create fails.

2015-03-30 Thread shuang . he
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: 
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6093
-Summary-
Platform  Delta  drm-intel-nightly  Series Applied
PNV -3  270/270  267/270
ILK  303/303  303/303
SNB  304/304  304/304
IVB  337/337  337/337
BYT  287/287  287/287
HSW  361/361  361/361
BDW  309/309  309/309
-Detailed-
Platform  Testdrm-intel-nightly  Series 
Applied
 PNV  igt@gem_userptr_blits@coherency-sync  CRASH(4)PASS(2)  CRASH(2)
*PNV  igt@gem_pwrite_pread@snooped-pwrite-blt-cpu_mmap-correctness  PASS(2) 
 CRASH(1)PASS(1)
 PNV  igt@gem_tiled_pread_pwrite  FAIL(1)PASS(3)  FAIL(2)
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx