Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:57:33PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
> 
> Built on 4d09810b01441f9124c072a866f608b748f92f6c drm-intel-nightly: 
> 2016y-01m-13d-12h-32m-08s UTC integration manifest
> 
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
> Subgroup basic-render:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)

This was https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93693 but has since
been fixed.
-Daniel

> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
> 
> bdw-nuci7total:138  pass:129  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9  
> bdw-ultratotal:138  pass:131  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6  
> bsw-nuc-2total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> hsw-brixbox  total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
> hsw-gt2  total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> hsw-xps12total:138  pass:133  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> ilk-hp8440p  total:141  pass:101  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> ivb-t430stotal:135  pass:122  dwarn:3   dfail:4   fail:0   skip:6  
> skl-i5k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> skl-i7k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> snb-dellxps  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
> snb-x220ttotal:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1169/
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Jani Nikula]

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, "Adebisi, YetundeX"  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this message in reply to this patch 
> (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60736/). 
>
> It looks like most of the warnings are related to 'PWM1 enabled'
> warnings that happen when the hardware is going into some power
> management state and BLM_PWM_ENABLE and/or BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE are
> enabled on the bdw-ultra platform.

This sounds plausible if the panel actually has DPCD controlled
backlight; I was unable to confirm from the CI logs. The BIOS probably
enables the PWMs at boot, and then we don't disable.

What confuses me is that the backlight works on the machine *without*
your patches. IIUC your patch should only enable DPCD backlight control
if the DPCD says PWM control is not available.

> What is the best way to fix this? If my patch is used then the
> function that disables BLM_PWM_ENABLE and/or BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE
> (lpt_disable_backlight) will not be called.
>
> Should I disable this DPCD backlight control featured for BDW or
> specifically disable these bits in my intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight
> function?

Whether it makes sense or not, I predict the BIOSes of all machines to
blindly enable the PWMs. Including when the panel really doesn't support
PWM control. So we need to sanitize these registers.

See the comment in lpt_disable_backlight, this is already the case for
CPU PWM when only PCH PWM is used. I think the right approach would be
to sanitize the state at setup time instead of disable time.

The BDW in question is some development platform, I don't think you
could buy it. So it's a bit special, but we have it in CI because it has
some other features we like to test. Not sure how much conclusions one
can really draw from it.

BR,
Jani.



>
> Thank you.
>
> Yetunde
>
>
> Dmesg warn output
>
> [  357.655508] [ cut here ]
> [  357.655536] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 43 at 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:9518 hsw_enable_pc8+0x609/0x730 [i915]()
> [  357.655537] CPU PWM1 enabled
> [  357.655539] Modules linked in: i915 ax88179_178a i2c_hid 
> x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul 
> cdc_ncm usbnet mii mei_me mei lpc_ich i2c_designware_platform 
> i2c_designware_core e1000e sdhci_pci ptp pps_core sdhci_acpi sdhci mmc_core 
> [last unloaded: i915]
> [  357.69] CPU: 1 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G U  W   
> 4.4.0-gfxbench+ #1
> [  357.655560] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client 
> platform/Wilson Beach SDS, BIOS BDW-E2R1.86C.0095.R09.141036 10/30/2014
> [  357.655565] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
> [  357.655567]  a03e7ce8 8800ab8e3b68 813df90c 
> 8800ab8e3bb0
> [  357.655570]  8800ab8e3ba0 810746e1 8802308c 
> 880240341898
> [  357.655573]  8802403418a8 880240341148 880243bd3470 
> 8800ab8e3c00
> [  357.655576] Call Trace:
> [  357.655580]  [] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
> [  357.655583]  [] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
> [  357.655585]  [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
> [  357.655603]  [] hsw_enable_pc8+0x609/0x730 [i915]
> [  357.655610]  [] intel_suspend_complete+0xca/0x6c0 [i915]
> [  357.655617]  [] intel_runtime_suspend+0xdb/0x2d0 [i915]
> [  357.655620]  [] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x56/0x190
> [  357.655623]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
> [  357.655626]  [] __rpm_callback+0x2d/0x70
> [  357.655628]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
> [  357.655631]  [] rpm_callback+0x1f/0x80
> [  357.655633]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
> [  357.655635]  [] rpm_suspend+0x148/0x780
> [  357.655638]  [] pm_runtime_work+0x76/0xc0
> [  357.655641]  [] process_one_work+0x1e5/0x620
> [  357.655642]  [] ? process_one_work+0x149/0x620
> [  357.655645]  [] worker_thread+0x49/0x450
> [  357.655646]  [] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
> [  357.655648]  [] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
> [  357.655651]  [] kthread+0xea/0x100
> [  357.655653]  [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x50
> [  357.655656]  [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0
> [  357.655658]  [] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> [  357.655661]  [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0
> [  357.655662] ---[ end trace d4f8f254173751a9 ]---
> [  357.655665] [ cut here ]
> [  357.655682] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 43 at 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:9523 hsw_enable_pc8+0x701/0x730 [i915]()
> [  357.655683] PCH PWM1 enabled
> [  357.655684] Modules linked in: i915 ax88179_178a i2c_hid 
> x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul 
> cdc_ncm usbnet mii mei_me mei lpc_ich i2c_designware_platform 
> i2c_designware_core e1000e sdhci_pci ptp pps_core sdhci_acpi sdhci mmc_core 
> [last unloaded: i915]
> [  357.655699] CPU: 1 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G U  W   
> 4.4.0-gfxbench+ #1
> [  357.655701] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client 
> platform/Wilson Beach SDS, BIOS BDW-E2R1.86C.0095.R09.141036 

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Adebisi, YetundeX]

Hi,

I got this message in reply to this patch 
(https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/60736/). 

It looks like most of the warnings are related to  'PWM1 enabled' warnings that 
happen when the hardware is going into some power management state and 
BLM_PWM_ENABLE and/or BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE are enabled on the bdw-ultra platform.

What is the best way to fix this? If my patch is used then the function that 
disables BLM_PWM_ENABLE and/or BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE (lpt_disable_backlight) will 
not be called. 

Should I disable this DPCD backlight control featured  for BDW or specifically 
disable these bits in my intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight function?

Thank you.

Yetunde


Dmesg warn output

[  357.655508] [ cut here ]
[  357.655536] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 43 at 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:9518 hsw_enable_pc8+0x609/0x730 [i915]()
[  357.655537] CPU PWM1 enabled
[  357.655539] Modules linked in: i915 ax88179_178a i2c_hid 
x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul 
cdc_ncm usbnet mii mei_me mei lpc_ich i2c_designware_platform 
i2c_designware_core e1000e sdhci_pci ptp pps_core sdhci_acpi sdhci mmc_core 
[last unloaded: i915]
[  357.69] CPU: 1 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G U  W   
4.4.0-gfxbench+ #1
[  357.655560] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client 
platform/Wilson Beach SDS, BIOS BDW-E2R1.86C.0095.R09.141036 10/30/2014
[  357.655565] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[  357.655567]  a03e7ce8 8800ab8e3b68 813df90c 
8800ab8e3bb0
[  357.655570]  8800ab8e3ba0 810746e1 8802308c 
880240341898
[  357.655573]  8802403418a8 880240341148 880243bd3470 
8800ab8e3c00
[  357.655576] Call Trace:
[  357.655580]  [] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[  357.655583]  [] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[  357.655585]  [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
[  357.655603]  [] hsw_enable_pc8+0x609/0x730 [i915]
[  357.655610]  [] intel_suspend_complete+0xca/0x6c0 [i915]
[  357.655617]  [] intel_runtime_suspend+0xdb/0x2d0 [i915]
[  357.655620]  [] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x56/0x190
[  357.655623]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655626]  [] __rpm_callback+0x2d/0x70
[  357.655628]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655631]  [] rpm_callback+0x1f/0x80
[  357.655633]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655635]  [] rpm_suspend+0x148/0x780
[  357.655638]  [] pm_runtime_work+0x76/0xc0
[  357.655641]  [] process_one_work+0x1e5/0x620
[  357.655642]  [] ? process_one_work+0x149/0x620
[  357.655645]  [] worker_thread+0x49/0x450
[  357.655646]  [] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
[  357.655648]  [] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
[  357.655651]  [] kthread+0xea/0x100
[  357.655653]  [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x50
[  357.655656]  [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  357.655658]  [] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[  357.655661]  [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  357.655662] ---[ end trace d4f8f254173751a9 ]---
[  357.655665] [ cut here ]
[  357.655682] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 43 at 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:9523 hsw_enable_pc8+0x701/0x730 [i915]()
[  357.655683] PCH PWM1 enabled
[  357.655684] Modules linked in: i915 ax88179_178a i2c_hid 
x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul 
cdc_ncm usbnet mii mei_me mei lpc_ich i2c_designware_platform 
i2c_designware_core e1000e sdhci_pci ptp pps_core sdhci_acpi sdhci mmc_core 
[last unloaded: i915]
[  357.655699] CPU: 1 PID: 43 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G U  W   
4.4.0-gfxbench+ #1
[  357.655701] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client 
platform/Wilson Beach SDS, BIOS BDW-E2R1.86C.0095.R09.141036 10/30/2014
[  357.655704] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[  357.655705]  a03e7ce8 8800ab8e3b68 813df90c 
8800ab8e3bb0
[  357.655708]  8800ab8e3ba0 810746e1 8802308c 
880240341898
[  357.655711]  8802403418a8 880240341148 880243bd3470 
8800ab8e3c00
[  357.655714] Call Trace:
[  357.655716]  [] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[  357.655718]  [] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[  357.655720]  [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
[  357.655736]  [] hsw_enable_pc8+0x701/0x730 [i915]
[  357.655743]  [] intel_suspend_complete+0xca/0x6c0 [i915]
[  357.655750]  [] intel_runtime_suspend+0xdb/0x2d0 [i915]
[  357.655753]  [] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x56/0x190
[  357.655755]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655758]  [] __rpm_callback+0x2d/0x70
[  357.655760]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655763]  [] rpm_callback+0x1f/0x80
[  357.655765]  [] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[  357.655767]  [] rpm_suspend+0x148/0x780
[  357.655770]  [] pm_runtime_work+0x76/0xc0
[  357.655772]  [] process_one_work+0x1e5/0x620
[  357.655773]  [] ? process_one_work+0x149/0x620
[  357.655775]  [] worker_thread+0x49/0x450
[  357.655777]  [] ? process_one_work+0x620/0x620
[  357.655779]  [] ? 

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 14/01/16 09:49, Patchwork wrote:

== Summary ==

Built on 058740f8fced6851aeda34f366f5330322cd585f drm-intel-nightly: 
2016y-01m-13d-17h-07m-44s UTC integration manifest

Test gem_storedw_loop:
 Subgroup basic-render:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-nuci7)
Test kms_force_connector_basic:
 Subgroup force-connector-state:
 pass   -> SKIP   (ivb-t430s)


Unrelated, apparently new so filed:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93769


Test pm_rpm:
 Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i7k-2)


Known unrelated issue:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93768

Please do this type of analysis in the future every time CI result is 
not a success, or I am not merging things to avoid getting spanked by 
the maintainer. :)


Regards,

Tvrtko



bdw-nuci7total:138  pass:129  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
bdw-ultratotal:138  pass:132  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
bsw-nuc-2total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24
hsw-brixbox  total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
ilk-hp8440p  total:141  pass:100  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37
ivb-t430stotal:135  pass:121  dwarn:3   dfail:4   fail:0   skip:7
skl-i5k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
skl-i7k-2total:141  pass:130  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
snb-dellxps  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14
snb-x220ttotal:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1179/

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 08:24:52AM -, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
> 
> Built on 06d0112e293dfdea7f796d4085f755898850947b drm-intel-nightly: 
> 2016y-01m-12d-21h-16m-40s UTC integration manifest
> 
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
> Subgroup basic-render:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-nuci7)

That I take it is this:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93693

> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (skl-i7k-2)
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)

This is the age old
[drm:vlv_check_no_gt_access [i915]] *ERROR* GT register access while GT waking 
disabled
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93121

So these have nothing to do with these patches it seems.

> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
> fail   -> PASS   (snb-x220t)
> 
> bdw-nuci7total:138  pass:128  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9  
> bdw-ultratotal:138  pass:132  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6  
> bsw-nuc-2total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> byt-nuc  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
> hsw-brixbox  total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
> hsw-gt2  total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> hsw-xps12total:138  pass:133  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> ilk-hp8440p  total:141  pass:101  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> skl-i7k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> snb-dellxps  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
> snb-x220ttotal:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1157/

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:13:17PM -, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
> 
> Built on 8da57dfe6c675c35109dac986e3f8b627cffab49 drm-intel-nightly: 
> 2016y-01m-13d-10h-33m-04s UTC integration manifest
> 
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
> Subgroup basic-render:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)

This is a pre-existing bug already tracked in

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93693

> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)
> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)

This seems to be a very sporadic issue on bdw-ultra with pipe B/C and
the rpm wakelock check. Preexisting, but not yet tracked in bugzilla it
seems. I created a new one:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93699

> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (snb-x220t)
> 
> bdw-nuci7total:138  pass:128  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9  
> bdw-ultratotal:138  pass:131  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6  
> bsw-nuc-2total:141  pass:115  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> hsw-brixbox  total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
> hsw-gt2  total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> ilk-hp8440p  total:141  pass:101  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> ivb-t430stotal:135  pass:122  dwarn:3   dfail:4   fail:0   skip:6  
> skl-i5k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> skl-i7k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> snb-dellxps  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
> snb-x220ttotal:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1163/

Patch merged with Ville's r-b from the previous round.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:13:53AM -, Patchwork wrote:
> == Summary ==
> 
> Built on ff88655b3a5467bbc3be8c67d3e05ebf182557d3 drm-intel-nightly: 
> 2016y-01m-11d-07h-30m-16s UTC integration manifest
> 
> Test gem_storedw_loop:
> Subgroup basic-render:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (skl-i7k-2) UNSTABLE
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
> pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i7k-2)

Seem to have a regression here, and passing BAT is now required.
-Daniel

> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS   (byt-nuc)
> 
> bdw-nuci7total:138  pass:129  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9  
> bdw-ultratotal:138  pass:132  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6  
> bsw-nuc-2total:141  pass:114  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24 
> byt-nuc  total:141  pass:119  dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:15 
> hsw-brixbox  total:141  pass:134  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7  
> hsw-gt2  total:141  pass:137  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4  
> ilk-hp8440p  total:141  pass:100  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:37 
> skl-i5k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> skl-i7k-2total:141  pass:131  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8  
> snb-dellxps  total:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14 
> snb-x220ttotal:141  pass:122  dwarn:5   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:13 
> 
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1117/
> 
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, Libin Yang  wrote:
> Sorry to interrupt.
>
> I got this email sent to me. It seems one of my patch causes this 
> issue? Does anyone know how to find which patch causes this issue from 
> the below message? Thanks.

Some of the tests don't give stable results yet. We're working on it. It
doesn't look like your patch would change the results of any of those
tests for real.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Best Regards,
> Libin
>
> On 12/23/2015 03:49 PM, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> Built on 7e671e69deffb88d60687dacffe6e34a5d046500 drm-intel-nightly: 
>> 2015y-12m-22d-13h-28m-34s UTC integration manifest
>>
>> Test gem_storedw_loop:
>>  Subgroup basic-render:
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
>> Test kms_flip:
>>  Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
>>  Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bsw-nuc-2)
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (byt-nuc)
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-nuci7)
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
>>  Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)
>> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>>  Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (byt-nuc)
>>  Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (skl-i5k-2)
>>  Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
>>  pass   -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
>> Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
>>  Subgroup psr_basic:
>>  dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)
>>
>> bdw-nuci7total:132  pass:121  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
>> bdw-ultratotal:132  pass:124  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
>> bsw-nuc-2total:135  pass:114  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20
>> byt-nuc  total:135  pass:119  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13
>> hsw-brixbox  total:135  pass:126  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
>> hsw-gt2  total:135  pass:130  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
>> hsw-xps12total:132  pass:125  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
>> ilk-hp8440p  total:135  pass:100  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
>> ivb-t430stotal:135  pass:127  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
>> skl-i5k-2total:135  pass:123  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
>> skl-i7k-2total:135  pass:124  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
>> snb-dellxps  total:135  pass:121  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
>> snb-x220ttotal:135  pass:122  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:11
>>
>> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_799/
>>
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT

[Libin Yang]

Sorry to interrupt.

I got this email sent to me. It seems one of my patch causes this 
issue? Does anyone know how to find which patch causes this issue from 
the below message? Thanks.


Best Regards,
Libin

On 12/23/2015 03:49 PM, Patchwork wrote:

== Summary ==

Built on 7e671e69deffb88d60687dacffe6e34a5d046500 drm-intel-nightly: 
2015y-12m-22d-13h-28m-34s UTC integration manifest

Test gem_storedw_loop:
 Subgroup basic-render:
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
Test kms_flip:
 Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
 Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bsw-nuc-2)
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2)
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (byt-nuc)
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-nuci7)
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (ilk-hp8440p)
 Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (bdw-ultra)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
 Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (byt-nuc)
 Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (skl-i5k-2)
 Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
 pass   -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc)
Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
 Subgroup psr_basic:
 dmesg-warn -> PASS   (bdw-ultra)

bdw-nuci7total:132  pass:121  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:9
bdw-ultratotal:132  pass:124  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
bsw-nuc-2total:135  pass:114  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20
byt-nuc  total:135  pass:119  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13
hsw-brixbox  total:135  pass:126  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:7
hsw-gt2  total:135  pass:130  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
hsw-xps12total:132  pass:125  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:4
ilk-hp8440p  total:135  pass:100  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35
ivb-t430stotal:135  pass:127  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:6
skl-i5k-2total:135  pass:123  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
skl-i7k-2total:135  pass:124  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:8
snb-dellxps  total:135  pass:121  dwarn:2   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:12
snb-x220ttotal:135  pass:122  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:11

Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_799/


___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx